BACKGROUND: Women are at higher risk of breast cancer if they have higher socioeconomic status (SES) or live in higher SES or urban communities. We examined whether women living in such communities remained at greater risk of breast cancer after controlling for individual education and other known individual-level risk factors. METHODS: Data were from a population-based, breast cancer case-control study conducted in Wisconsin from 1988 to 1995 (n = 14,667). Data on community SES and urbanicity come from the 1990 census, measured at the census tract and zip code levels. We evaluated relationships between individual- and community-level variables and breast cancer risk using multilevel logistic regression models with random community intercepts. RESULTS: After controlling for individual education and other individual-level risk factors (age, mammography use, family history of breast cancer, parity, age at first birth, alcohol intake, body mass index, hormone replacement use, oral contraceptive use, and menopausal status), women living in the highest SES communities had greater odds of having breast cancer than women living in the lowest SES communities (1.20; 95% confidence interval = 1.05-1.37). Similarly, the odds were greater for women in urban versus rural communities (1.17; 1.06-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: Community SES and urbanicity are apparently not simply proxies for individual SES. Future research should examine why living in such communities itself is associated with greater risk of breast cancer. Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
BACKGROUND:Women are at higher risk of breast cancer if they have higher socioeconomic status (SES) or live in higher SES or urban communities. We examined whether women living in such communities remained at greater risk of breast cancer after controlling for individual education and other known individual-level risk factors. METHODS: Data were from a population-based, breast cancer case-control study conducted in Wisconsin from 1988 to 1995 (n = 14,667). Data on community SES and urbanicity come from the 1990 census, measured at the census tract and zip code levels. We evaluated relationships between individual- and community-level variables and breast cancer risk using multilevel logistic regression models with random community intercepts. RESULTS: After controlling for individual education and other individual-level risk factors (age, mammography use, family history of breast cancer, parity, age at first birth, alcohol intake, body mass index, hormone replacement use, oral contraceptive use, and menopausal status), women living in the highest SES communities had greater odds of having breast cancer than women living in the lowest SES communities (1.20; 95% confidence interval = 1.05-1.37). Similarly, the odds were greater for women in urban versus rural communities (1.17; 1.06-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: Community SES and urbanicity are apparently not simply proxies for individual SES. Future research should examine why living in such communities itself is associated with greater risk of breast cancer. Copyright 2004 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Authors: Maureen Sanderson; Ann L Coker; Adriana Perez; Xianglin L Du; Gerson Peltz; Mary K Fadden Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2006-07-12 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Shannon M Conroy; Christina A Clarke; Juan Yang; Salma Shariff-Marco; Yurii B Shvetsov; Song-Yi Park; Cheryl L Albright; Andrew Hertz; Kristine R Monroe; Laurence N Kolonel; Loïc Le Marchand; Lynne R Wilkens; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Iona Cheng Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Joy Pader; Robert B Basmadjian; Dylan E O'Sullivan; Nicole E Mealey; Yibing Ruan; Christine Friedenreich; Rachel Murphy; Edwin Wang; May Lynn Quan; Darren R Brenner Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Marc A Emerson; Yvonne M Golightly; Allison E Aiello; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Xianming Tan; Ugwuji Maduekwe; Marian Johnson-Thompson; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Susanne Singer; Michael Bartels; Susanne Briest; Jens Einenkel; Dietger Niederwieser; Kirsten Papsdorf; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Sophie Künstler; Sabine Taubenheim; Oliver Krauß Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-12-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mario Schootman; Min Lian; Anjali D Deshpande; Elizabeth A Baker; Sandi L Pruitt; Rebecca Aft; Donna B Jeffe Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 4.872