Siobhan M Phillips1, Kevin W Dodd2, Jeremy Steeves3, James McClain4, Catherine M Alfano4, Edward McAuley5. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, United States. Electronic address: smphillips@northwestern.edu. 2. Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, United States. 3. Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, United States. 4. Division of Cancer Control and Population Science, National Cancer Institute, United States. 5. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Inactivity and sedentary behavior are related to poorer health outcomes in breast cancer survivors. However, few studies examining these behaviors in survivors have used objective measures, considered activities other than moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity (MVPA) and/or sedentary behavior (i.e. low intensity activities) or compared survivors to healthy controls. The purpose of the present study is to compare accelerometer-measured activity of various intensities (total, light, lifestyle, MVPA) and sedentary behavior between breast cancer survivors and non-cancer controls. METHODS: An imputation-based approach of independent sample t-tests adjusting for multiple comparisons was used to compare estimates of participation in each activity and sedentary behavior between survivors [n=398; M(SD)age=56.95 (9.11)] and block-matched non-cancer controls [n=1120; M(SD)age=54.88 (16.11)]. Potential moderating effects of body mass index (BMI), age, and education were also examined. RESULTS:Breast cancer survivors registered less daily total (282.8 v. 346.9) light (199.1 v. 259.3) and lifestyle (62.0 v. 71.7) activity minutes and more MVPA (21.6 v. 15.9) and sedentary behavior (555.7 v. 500.6) minutes than controls (p<0.001 for all). These relationships were largely consistent across BMI, age and education. On average, survivors spent an estimated 66.4% of their waking time sedentary and 31.1% in light/lifestyle activity and 2.6% in MVPA. CONCLUSIONS:Breast cancer survivors are more sedentary and participate in less low intensity activity than controls. Although survivors registered more MVPA, these levels were insufficient. Future research should explore these differences and potential benefits of targeting low intensity activities and reducing sedentary time in this population.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Inactivity and sedentary behavior are related to poorer health outcomes in breast cancer survivors. However, few studies examining these behaviors in survivors have used objective measures, considered activities other than moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity (MVPA) and/or sedentary behavior (i.e. low intensity activities) or compared survivors to healthy controls. The purpose of the present study is to compare accelerometer-measured activity of various intensities (total, light, lifestyle, MVPA) and sedentary behavior between breast cancer survivors and non-cancer controls. METHODS: An imputation-based approach of independent sample t-tests adjusting for multiple comparisons was used to compare estimates of participation in each activity and sedentary behavior between survivors [n=398; M(SD)age=56.95 (9.11)] and block-matched non-cancer controls [n=1120; M(SD)age=54.88 (16.11)]. Potential moderating effects of body mass index (BMI), age, and education were also examined. RESULTS:Breast cancer survivors registered less daily total (282.8 v. 346.9) light (199.1 v. 259.3) and lifestyle (62.0 v. 71.7) activity minutes and more MVPA (21.6 v. 15.9) and sedentary behavior (555.7 v. 500.6) minutes than controls (p<0.001 for all). These relationships were largely consistent across BMI, age and education. On average, survivors spent an estimated 66.4% of their waking time sedentary and 31.1% in light/lifestyle activity and 2.6% in MVPA. CONCLUSIONS:Breast cancer survivors are more sedentary and participate in less low intensity activity than controls. Although survivors registered more MVPA, these levels were insufficient. Future research should explore these differences and potential benefits of targeting low intensity activities and reducing sedentary time in this population.
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Stephanie M George; Steven C Moore; Heather R Bowles; Aaron Blair; Yikyung Park; Richard P Troiano; Albert Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Kong Y Chen; Patty S Freedson; Maciej S Buchowski; Bettina M Beech; Russell R Pate; Richard P Troiano Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-02-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Catherine M Sabiston; Jennifer Brunet; Jeff K Vallance; Sarkis Meterissian Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Catrine Tudor-Locke; Barbara E Ainsworth; Raymond W Thompson; Charles E Matthews Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Brigid M Lynch; Ester Cerin; Neville Owen; Anna L Hawkes; Joanne F Aitken Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Brigid M Lynch; David W Dunstan; Genevieve N Healy; Elisabeth Winkler; Elizabeth Eakin; Neville Owen Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Whitney A Welch; Diane Ehlers; Kara L Gavin; Susan Aguinaga; Alison Cottrell; Anne Nielsen; Payton Solk; Edward McAuley; Siobhan M Phillips Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Siobhan M Phillips; Elizabeth A Awick; David E Conroy; Christine A Pellegrini; Emily L Mailey; Edward McAuley Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860