OBJECTIVES: Physical activity is associated with better quality of life (QOL) among breast cancer survivors. However, it is unknown the extent to which time spent sedentary or replacing this time with active behaviors may affect QOL. Our aim was to determine the effect of substituting time between sedentary and active behaviors on QOL indicators in breast cancer survivors. METHODS: An isotemporal substitution approach was used to examine the associations of reallocating time to sedentary and active behaviors measured by accelerometry with Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Breast (FACT-B; total, physical, social, emotional, functional well-being, and breast cancer-specific concerns) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores in a pooled analysis of breast cancer survivors (n = 753; Mage = 56.9 ± 9.5 y) from two observational studies. RESULTS: Reallocating 30 minutes of sedentary time to 30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) was associated with improved FACT-B total (B = 3.0; 95% CI, 0.6-4.5), physical well-being (B = 0.8; 95% CI, 0.33-1.2), and functional well-being (B = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.03-1.2) scores. Reallocating 30 minutes of light activity to 30 minutes of MVPA was associated with improved FACT-B total (B = 2.4; 95% CI, 0.3-6.0) and physical well-being (B = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.27-1.2) scores. There was no significant substitution of time effects on HADS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Substituting sedentary time with MVPA showed the greatest range of effects across QOL indicators. These results can inform intervention development interventions and more comprehensive activity recommendations for breast cancer survivors.
OBJECTIVES: Physical activity is associated with better quality of life (QOL) among breast cancer survivors. However, it is unknown the extent to which time spent sedentary or replacing this time with active behaviors may affect QOL. Our aim was to determine the effect of substituting time between sedentary and active behaviors on QOL indicators in breast cancer survivors. METHODS: An isotemporal substitution approach was used to examine the associations of reallocating time to sedentary and active behaviors measured by accelerometry with Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Breast (FACT-B; total, physical, social, emotional, functional well-being, and breast cancer-specific concerns) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores in a pooled analysis of breast cancer survivors (n = 753; Mage = 56.9 ± 9.5 y) from two observational studies. RESULTS: Reallocating 30 minutes of sedentary time to 30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) was associated with improved FACT-B total (B = 3.0; 95% CI, 0.6-4.5), physical well-being (B = 0.8; 95% CI, 0.33-1.2), and functional well-being (B = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.03-1.2) scores. Reallocating 30 minutes of light activity to 30 minutes of MVPA was associated with improved FACT-B total (B = 2.4; 95% CI, 0.3-6.0) and physical well-being (B = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.27-1.2) scores. There was no significant substitution of time effects on HADS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Substituting sedentary time with MVPA showed the greatest range of effects across QOL indicators. These results can inform intervention development interventions and more comprehensive activity recommendations for breast cancer survivors.
Authors: Kathryn H Schmitz; Kerry S Courneya; Charles Matthews; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Daniel A Galvão; Bernardine M Pinto; Melinda L Irwin; Kathleen Y Wolin; Roanne J Segal; Alejandro Lucia; Carole M Schneider; Vivian E von Gruenigen; Anna L Schwartz Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Matthew P Buman; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Jonathan M Kurka; Eric B Hekler; Carol M Baldwin; Neville Owen; Barbara E Ainsworth; Genevieve N Healy; Paul A Gardiner Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Diane K Ehlers; Susan Aguiñaga; Josh Cosman; Joan Severson; Arthur F Kramer; Edward McAuley Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-07-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: M J Brady; D F Cella; F Mo; A E Bonomi; D S Tulsky; S R Lloyd; S Deasy; M Cobleigh; G Shiomoto Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Eline H van Roekel; Martijn J L Bours; José J L Breedveld-Peters; Paul J B Willems; Kenneth Meijer; Ijmert Kant; Piet A van den Brandt; Geerard L Beets; Silvia Sanduleanu; Matty P Weijenberg Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Diane K Ehlers; Jason Fanning; Elizabeth A Salerno; Susan Aguiñaga; Josh Cosman; Joan Severson; Arthur F Kramer; Edward McAuley Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Lee Ingle; Samantha Ruilova; Yunsung Cui; Vanessa DeClercq; Ellen Sweeney; Zhijie Michael Yu; Cynthia C Forbes Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 2.532
Authors: Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Wanting Zhai; Jaeil Ahn; Brent J Small; Tim A Ahles; Judith E Carroll; Neelima Denduluri; Asma Dilawari; Martine Extermann; Deena Graham; Arti Hurria; Claudine Isaacs; Paul B Jacobsen; Heather S L Jim; George Luta; Brenna C McDonald; Sunita K Patel; James C Root; Andrew J Saykin; Danielle B Tometich; Xingtao Zhou; Harvey J Cohen Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 6.921