BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviors predominate modern life, yet we do not fully understand the adverse effects of these behaviors on mortality after considering the benefits of moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypotheses that higher amounts of overall sitting time and television viewing are positively associated with mortality and described the independent and combined effects of these sedentary behaviors and MVPA on mortality. DESIGN: In the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, we examined 240,819 adults (aged 50-71 y) who did not report any cancer, cardiovascular disease, or respiratory disease at baseline. Mortality was ascertained over 8.5 y. RESULTS: Sedentary behaviors were positively associated with mortality after adjustment for age, sex, education, smoking, diet, race, and MVPA. Participants who reported the most television viewing (≥7 h compared with <1 h/d) were at greater risk of all-cause (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.47, 1.76), cardiovascular (HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.56, 2.20), and cancer (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.40) mortality after adjustment for MVPA. Overall sitting was associated with all-cause mortality. Even among adults reporting high levels of MVPA (>7 h/wk), high amounts of television viewing (≥7 h/d) remained associated with increased risk of all-cause (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.79) and cardiovascular (HR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.33, 3.00) mortality compared with those reporting the least television viewing (<1 h/d). CONCLUSIONS: Time spent in sedentary behaviors was positively associated with mortality, and participation in high levels of MVPA did not fully mitigate health risks associated with prolonged time watching television. Adults should be encouraged to reduce time spent in sedentary behaviors, when possible, and to participate in MVPA at recommended levels. The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00340015.
BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviors predominate modern life, yet we do not fully understand the adverse effects of these behaviors on mortality after considering the benefits of moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypotheses that higher amounts of overall sitting time and television viewing are positively associated with mortality and described the independent and combined effects of these sedentary behaviors and MVPA on mortality. DESIGN: In the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, we examined 240,819 adults (aged 50-71 y) who did not report any cancer, cardiovascular disease, or respiratory disease at baseline. Mortality was ascertained over 8.5 y. RESULTS: Sedentary behaviors were positively associated with mortality after adjustment for age, sex, education, smoking, diet, race, and MVPA. Participants who reported the most television viewing (≥7 h compared with <1 h/d) were at greater risk of all-cause (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.47, 1.76), cardiovascular (HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.56, 2.20), and cancer (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.40) mortality after adjustment for MVPA. Overall sitting was associated with all-cause mortality. Even among adults reporting high levels of MVPA (>7 h/wk), high amounts of television viewing (≥7 h/d) remained associated with increased risk of all-cause (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.79) and cardiovascular (HR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.33, 3.00) mortality compared with those reporting the least television viewing (<1 h/d). CONCLUSIONS: Time spent in sedentary behaviors was positively associated with mortality, and participation in high levels of MVPA did not fully mitigate health risks associated with prolonged time watching television. Adults should be encouraged to reduce time spent in sedentary behaviors, when possible, and to participate in MVPA at recommended levels. The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00340015.
Authors: Todd M Manini; James E Everhart; Kushang V Patel; Dale A Schoeller; Lisa H Colbert; Marjolein Visser; Frances Tylavsky; Douglas C Bauer; Bret H Goodpaster; Tamara B Harris Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-07-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A Schatzkin; A F Subar; F E Thompson; L C Harlan; J Tangrea; A R Hollenbeck; P E Hurwitz; L Coyle; N Schussler; D S Michaud; L S Freedman; C C Brown; D Midthune; V Kipnis Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2001-12-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: James A Levine; Lorraine M Lanningham-Foster; Shelly K McCrady; Alisa C Krizan; Leslie R Olson; Paul H Kane; Michael D Jensen; Matthew M Clark Journal: Science Date: 2005-01-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Noël C Barengo; Gang Hu; Timo A Lakka; Heikki Pekkarinen; Aulikki Nissinen; Jaakko Tuomilehto Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Robert V Same; David I Feldman; Nishant Shah; Seth S Martin; Mahmoud Al Rifai; Michael J Blaha; Garth Graham; Haitham M Ahmed Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Siobhan M Phillips; Meir J Stampfer; June M Chan; Edward L Giovannucci; Stacey A Kenfield Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Sarah Kozey Keadle; Pedro F Saint-Maurice; Steven C Moore; Erik A Willis; Joshua N Sampson; David Berrigan Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Brigid M Lynch; Christine M Friedenreich; Karen A Kopciuk; Albert R Hollenbeck; Steven C Moore; Charles E Matthews Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Rebecca Seguin; David M Buchner; Jingmin Liu; Matthew Allison; Todd Manini; Ching-Yun Wang; Joann E Manson; Catherine R Messina; Mahesh J Patel; Larry Moreland; Marcia L Stefanick; Andrea Z Lacroix Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Andrea K Chomistek; JoAnn E Manson; Marcia L Stefanick; Bing Lu; Megan Sands-Lincoln; Scott B Going; Lorena Garcia; Matthew A Allison; Stacy T Sims; Michael J LaMonte; Karen C Johnson; Charles B Eaton Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 24.094