Literature DB >> 12471314

Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity.

Catrine Tudor-Locke1, Barbara E Ainsworth, Raymond W Thompson, Charles E Matthews.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was 1) to evaluate agreement between dual-mode CSA accelerometer outputs and Yamax pedometer outputs assessed concurrently under free-living conditions; 2) to determine the relationship between pedometer-steps per day and CSA-time spent in inactivity and in light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity activities; and 3) to identify a value of pedometer-steps per day that corresponds with a minimum of 30 CSA-min x d(-1) of moderate ambulatory activity.
METHODS: Data were analyzed from 52 participants (27 men, 25 women; mean age = 38.2 +/- 12.0 yr; mean BMI = 26.4 +/- 4.5 kg x m(-2)) who were enrolled in the International Physical Activity Questionnaire study and wore both motion sensors during waking hours for 7 consecutive days.
RESULTS: Participants averaged 415.0+/-159.5 CSA-counts x min(-1) x d(-1), 357,601 +/- 138,425 CSA-counts x d(-1), 11,483 +/- 3,856 CSA-steps x d(-1), and 9,638 +/- 4,030 pedometer-steps x d(-1). There was a strong relationship between all CSA outputs and pedometer outputs (r = 0.74-0.86). The mean difference in steps detected between instruments was 1845+/-2116 steps x d(-1) (CSA > pedometer; t = 6.29, P < 0.0001). There were distinct differences (effect sizes >0.80) in mean CSA-time (min x d(-1)) in moderate and vigorous activity with increasing pedometer-determined activity quartiles; no differences were noted for inactivity or light activity. Approximately 33 CSA-min x d(-1) of moderate activity corresponded with 8000 pedometer-steps x d(-1).
CONCLUSION: Differences in mean steps per day detected may be due to differences in set instrument sensitivity thresholds and/or attachment. Additional studies with different populations are needed to confirm a recommended number of steps per day associated with the duration and intensity of public health recommendations for ambulatory activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12471314     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  100 in total

Review 1.  How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; David R Bassett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: construct validity.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Joel E Williams; Jared P Reis; Delores Pluto
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Comparison of two waist-mounted and two ankle-mounted electronic pedometers.

Authors:  Murat Karabulut; Scott E Crouter; David R Bassett
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Evaluation of quality of commercial pedometers.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Susan B Sisson; Sarah M Lee; Cora L Craig; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr

5.  Activity monitoring and energy expenditure in COPD patients: a validation study.

Authors:  Sanjay A Patel; Roberto P Benzo; William A Slivka; Frank C Sciurba
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.409

6.  Self-efficacy and environmental correlates of physical activity among older women and women with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Katherine S Morris; Edward McAuley; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2007-10-24

7.  A lifestyle physical activity intervention for caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Carol J Farran; Beth A Staffileno; David W Gilley; Judith J McCann; Cynthia M Castro; Abby C King
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.035

8.  Comparison of two objective monitors for assessing physical activity and sedentary behaviors in bariatric surgery patients.

Authors:  Jessica L Unick; Dale S Bond; John M Jakicic; Sivamainthan Vithiananthan; Beth A Ryder; G Dean Roye; Dieter Pohl; Jennifer Trautvetter; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Using three objective criteria to examine pedometer guidelines for free-living individuals.

Authors:  Duncan James Macfarlane; Dionise Chan; K L Chan; Edmond Y K Ho; Cherry C Y Lee
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Physical activity and fatigue in breast cancer survivors: a panel model examining the role of self-efficacy and depression.

Authors:  Siobhan M Phillips; Edward McAuley
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.