Jason T Wiseman1, Sara Fernandes-Taylor1, Maggie L Barnes1, Adela Tomsejova1, R Scott Saunders1, K Craig Kent2. 1. Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. 2. Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program (WiSOR), Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: Kent@surgery.wisc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Information technology is transforming health care communication. Using smartphones to remotely monitor incisional wounds via digital photos as well as collect postoperative symptom information has the potential to improve patient outcomes and transitional care. We surveyed a vulnerable patient population to evaluate smartphone capability and willingness to adopt this technology. METHODS: We surveyed 53 patients over a 9-mo period on the vascular surgery service at a tertiary care institution. Descriptive statistics were calculated to describe survey item response. RESULTS: A total of 94% of recruited patients (50 of 53) participated. The cohort was 50% female, and the mean age was age 70 y (range: 41-87). The majority of patients owned cell phones (80%) and 23% of these cell phones were smartphones. Ninety percent of patients had a friend or family member that could help take and send photos with a smartphone. Ninety-two percent of patients reported they would be willing to take a digital photo of their wound via a smartphone (68% daily, 22% every other day, 2% less than every other day, and 8% not at all). All patients reported they would be willing to answer questions related to their health via a smartphone. Patients identified several potential difficulties with regard to adopting a smartphone wound-monitoring protocol including logistics related to taking photos, health-related questions, and coordination with caretakers. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey demonstrates that an older patient cohort with significant comorbidity is able and willing to adopt a smartphone-based postoperative monitoring program. Patient training and caregiver participation will be essential to the success of this intervention.
BACKGROUND: Information technology is transforming health care communication. Using smartphones to remotely monitor incisional wounds via digital photos as well as collect postoperative symptom information has the potential to improve patient outcomes and transitional care. We surveyed a vulnerable patient population to evaluate smartphone capability and willingness to adopt this technology. METHODS: We surveyed 53 patients over a 9-mo period on the vascular surgery service at a tertiary care institution. Descriptive statistics were calculated to describe survey item response. RESULTS: A total of 94% of recruited patients (50 of 53) participated. The cohort was 50% female, and the mean age was age 70 y (range: 41-87). The majority of patients owned cell phones (80%) and 23% of these cell phones were smartphones. Ninety percent of patients had a friend or family member that could help take and send photos with a smartphone. Ninety-two percent of patients reported they would be willing to take a digital photo of their wound via a smartphone (68% daily, 22% every other day, 2% less than every other day, and 8% not at all). All patients reported they would be willing to answer questions related to their health via a smartphone. Patients identified several potential difficulties with regard to adopting a smartphone wound-monitoring protocol including logistics related to taking photos, health-related questions, and coordination with caretakers. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey demonstrates that an older patient cohort with significant comorbidity is able and willing to adopt a smartphone-based postoperative monitoring program. Patient training and caregiver participation will be essential to the success of this intervention.
Authors: Cleusa P Ferri; Martin Prince; Carol Brayne; Henry Brodaty; Laura Fratiglioni; Mary Ganguli; Kathleen Hall; Kazuo Hasegawa; Hugh Hendrie; Yueqin Huang; Anthony Jorm; Colin Mathers; Paulo R Menezes; Elizabeth Rimmer; Marcia Scazufca Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jason T Wiseman; Amanda M Guzman; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Travis L Engelbert; R Scott Saunders; K Craig Kent Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: D J Wirthlin; S Buradagunta; R A Edwards; D C Brewster; R P Cambria; J P Gertler; G M LaMuraglia; D E Jordan; J C Kvedar; W M Abbott Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Barbara Pieper; Mary Sieggreen; Cheryl K Nordstrom; Barbara Freeland; Pauline Kulwicki; Madelyn Frattaroli; Deborah Sidor; Maria Teresa Palleschi; Jerry Burns; Donna Bednarski Journal: J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.741
Authors: Andrea Hassol; James M Walker; David Kidder; Kim Rokita; David Young; Steven Pierdon; Deborah Deitz; Sarah Kuck; Eduardo Ortiz Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2004-08-06 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Rebecca L Gunter; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Shahrose Rahman; Lola Awoyinka; Kyla M Bennett; Sharon M Weber; Caprice C Greenberg; K Craig Kent Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Kristy Kummerow Broman; Cameron E Gaskill; Adil Faqih; Michael Feng; Sharon E Phillips; William B Lober; Richard A Pierce; Michael D Holzman; Heather L Evans; Benjamin K Poulose Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Rebecca L Gunter; Skyler Chouinard; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Jason T Wiseman; Sam Clarkson; Kyla Bennett; Caprice C Greenberg; K Craig Kent Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Matthew W Miller; Rachael K Ross; Christina Voight; Heather Brouwer; Dean J Karavite; Jeffrey S Gerber; Robert W Grundmeier; Susan E Coffin Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Chris A Anthony; John E Femino; Aaron C Miller; Linnea A Polgreen; Edward O Rojas; Shelby L Francis; Alberto M Segre; Philip M Polgreen Journal: Iowa Orthop J Date: 2020
Authors: Kristy Kummerow Broman; Omobolanle O Oyefule; Sharon E Phillips; Rebeccah B Baucom; Michael D Holzman; Kenneth W Sharp; Richard A Pierce; William H Nealon; Benjamin K Poulose Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jason T Wiseman; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Rebecca Gunter; Maggie L Barnes; Richard Scott Saunders; Paul J Rathouz; Dai Yamanouchi; K Craig Kent Journal: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord Date: 2016-03-26