BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common nosocomial infection and the leading cause of readmission among surgical patients. Many SSIs develop in the postdischarge period and are inadequately recognized by patients. To address this, we developed a mobile health protocol of remote wound monitoring using smartphone technology. The current study aims to establish its feasibility among patients and providers. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled vascular surgery patients during their inpatient stay. They were trained to use our mobile health application, which allowed them to transmit digital images of their surgical wound and answer a survey about their recovery. After hospital discharge, participants completed the application daily for 2 weeks. Providers on the inpatient team reviewed submissions daily and contacted patients for concerning findings. RESULTS: Forty participants were enrolled. Forty-five percent of participants submitted data every day for 2 weeks, with an overall submission rate of 90.2%. Submissions were reviewed within an average of 9.7 hours of submission, with 91.9% of submissions reviewed within 24 hours. We detected 7 wound complications with 1 false negative. Participant and provider satisfaction was universally high. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and their caregivers are willing to participate in a mobile health program aimed at remote monitoring of postoperative recovery, and they are able to complete it with a high level of fidelity and satisfaction. Preliminary results indicate the ability to detect and intervene on wound complications.
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common nosocomial infection and the leading cause of readmission among surgical patients. Many SSIs develop in the postdischarge period and are inadequately recognized by patients. To address this, we developed a mobile health protocol of remote wound monitoring using smartphone technology. The current study aims to establish its feasibility among patients and providers. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled vascular surgery patients during their inpatient stay. They were trained to use our mobile health application, which allowed them to transmit digital images of their surgical wound and answer a survey about their recovery. After hospital discharge, participants completed the application daily for 2 weeks. Providers on the inpatient team reviewed submissions daily and contacted patients for concerning findings. RESULTS: Forty participants were enrolled. Forty-five percent of participants submitted data every day for 2 weeks, with an overall submission rate of 90.2%. Submissions were reviewed within an average of 9.7 hours of submission, with 91.9% of submissions reviewed within 24 hours. We detected 7 wound complications with 1 false negative. Participant and provider satisfaction was universally high. CONCLUSIONS:Patients and their caregivers are willing to participate in a mobile health program aimed at remote monitoring of postoperative recovery, and they are able to complete it with a high level of fidelity and satisfaction. Preliminary results indicate the ability to detect and intervene on wound complications.
Authors: Jason T Wiseman; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Maggie L Barnes; R Scott Saunders; Sandeep Saha; Jeffrey Havlena; Paul J Rathouz; K Craig Kent Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Jason T Wiseman; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Maggie L Barnes; Adela Tomsejova; R Scott Saunders; K Craig Kent Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Richard B Balaban; Alison A Galbraith; Marguerite E Burns; Catherine E Vialle-Valentin; Marc R Larochelle; Dennis Ross-Degnan Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brian W Jack; Veerappa K Chetty; David Anthony; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Gail M Sanchez; Anna E Johnson; Shaula R Forsythe; Julie K O'Donnell; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Christopher Manasseh; Stephen Martin; Larry Culpepper Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Katharine L Jackson; Robert E Glasgow; Britani R Hill; Mary C Mone; Bradford Sklow; Courtney L Scaife; Xiaoming Sheng; William J Peche Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Jennifer Q Zhang; Thomas Curran; John C McCallum; Li Wang; Mark C Wyers; Allen D Hamdan; Raul J Guzman; Marc L Schermerhorn Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Jason T Wiseman; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Rebecca Gunter; Maggie L Barnes; Richard Scott Saunders; Paul J Rathouz; Dai Yamanouchi; K Craig Kent Journal: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord Date: 2016-03-26
Authors: Kristy Kummerow Broman; Cameron E Gaskill; Adil Faqih; Michael Feng; Sharon E Phillips; William B Lober; Richard A Pierce; Michael D Holzman; Heather L Evans; Benjamin K Poulose Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Florence E Turrentine; Timothy L McMurry; Mark E Smolkin; R Scott Jones; Victor M Zaydfudim Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Thomas M Diehl; James R Barrett; Daniel E Abbott; Linda M Cherney Stafford; Bret M Hanlon; Qiuyu Yang; Rachel Van Doorn; Sharon M Weber; Corrine I Voils Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Shekhar K Gadkaree; Travis T Tollefson; Jennifer C Fuller; Faith C Muchemwa; Aleck Gonga; David A Shaye Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2019-06-28
Authors: Danielle C Lavallee; Jenney R Lee; John L Semple; William B Lober; Heather L Evans Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: Kenneth A McLean; Katie E Mountain; Catherine A Shaw; Thomas M Drake; Riinu Ots; Stephen R Knight; Cameron J Fairfield; Alessandro Sgrò; Richard J E Skipworth; Stephen J Wigmore; Mark A Potter; Ewen M Harrison Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 2.692