Literature DB >> 30422236

Evaluation of Wound Photography for Remote Postoperative Assessment of Surgical Site Infections.

Kristy Kummerow Broman1,2, Cameron E Gaskill3, Adil Faqih1, Michael Feng1, Sharon E Phillips1, William B Lober4, Richard A Pierce1, Michael D Holzman1, Heather L Evans3, Benjamin K Poulose1.   

Abstract

Importance: Surgeons are increasingly interested in using mobile and online applications with wound photography to monitor patients after surgery. Early work using remote care to diagnose surgical site infections (SSIs) demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy using wound photographs to augment patients' electronic reports of symptoms, but it is unclear whether these findings are reproducible in real-world practice. Objective: To determine how wound photography affects surgeons' abilities to diagnose SSIs in a pragmatic setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective study compared surgeons' paired assessments of postabdominal surgery case vignettes with vs without wound photography for detection of SSIs. Data for case vignettes were collected prospectively from May 1, 2007, to January 31, 2009, at Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and from July 1, 2015, to February 29, 2016, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. The surgeons were members of the American Medical Association whose self-designated specialty is general, abdominal, colorectal, oncologic, or vascular surgery and who completed internet-based assessments from May 21 to June 10, 2016. Intervention: Surgeons reviewed online clinical vignettes with or without wound photography. Main Outcomes and Measures: Surgeons' diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, confidence, and proposed management with respect to SSIs.
Results: A total of 523 surgeons (113 women and 410 men; mean [SD] age, 53 [10] years) completed a mean of 2.9 clinical vignettes. For the diagnosis of SSIs, the addition of wound photography did not change accuracy (863 of 1512 [57.1%] without and 878 of 1512 [58.1%] with photographs). Photographs decreased sensitivity (from 0.58 to 0.50) but increased specificity (from 0.56 to 0.63). In 415 of 1512 cases (27.4%), the addition of wound photography changed the surgeons' assessment (215 of 1512 [14.2%] changed from incorrect to correct and 200 of 1512 [13.2%] changed from correct to incorrect). Surgeons reported greater confidence when vignettes included a wound photograph compared with vignettes without a wound photograph, regardless of whether they correctly identified an SSI (median, 8 [interquartile range, 6-9] vs median, 8 [interquartile range, 7-9]; P < .001) but they were more likely to undertriage patients when vignettes included a wound photograph, regardless of whether they correctly identified an SSI. Conclusions and Relevance: In a practical simulation, wound photography increased specificity and surgeon confidence, but worsened sensitivity for detection of SSIs. Remote evaluation of patient-generated wound photographs may not accurately reflect the clinical state of surgical incisions. Effective widespread implementation of remote postoperative assessment with photography may require additional development of tools, participant training, and mechanisms to verify image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30422236      PMCID: PMC6439665          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  16 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Validity of Diagnosis of Superficial Infection of Laparotomy Wounds Using Digital Photography: Inter- and Intra-observer Agreement Among Surgeons.

Authors:  Gabriëlle H van Ramshorst; Wietske Vrijland; Erwin van der Harst; Wim C J Hop; Dennis den Hartog; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Wounds       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.546

3.  Modified hernia grading scale to stratify surgical site occurrence after open ventral hernia repairs.

Authors:  Arielle E Kanters; David M Krpata; Jeffrey A Blatnik; Yuri M Novitsky; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Does McNemar's test compare the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic tests?

Authors:  Soeun Kim; Woojoo Lee
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Feasibility of an Image-Based Mobile Health Protocol for Postoperative Wound Monitoring.

Authors:  Rebecca L Gunter; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Shahrose Rahman; Lola Awoyinka; Kyla M Bennett; Sharon M Weber; Caprice C Greenberg; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Current Use of Telemedicine for Post-Discharge Surgical Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rebecca L Gunter; Skyler Chouinard; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Jason T Wiseman; Sam Clarkson; Kyla Bennett; Caprice C Greenberg; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  A Prognostic Model of Surgical Site Infection Using Daily Clinical Wound Assessment.

Authors:  Patrick C Sanger; Gabrielle H van Ramshorst; Ezgi Mercan; Shuai Huang; Andrea L Hartzler; Cheryl A L Armstrong; Ross J Lordon; William B Lober; Heather L Evans
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Inter-rater agreement and checklist validation for postoperative wound assessment using smartphone images in vascular surgery.

Authors:  Jason T Wiseman; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Rebecca Gunter; Maggie L Barnes; Richard Scott Saunders; Paul J Rathouz; Dai Yamanouchi; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2016-03-26

9.  Agreement among health care professionals in diagnosing case Vignette-based surgical site infections.

Authors:  Didier Lepelletier; Philippe Ravaud; Gabriel Baron; Jean-Christophe Lucet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Agreement among healthcare professionals in ten European countries in diagnosing case-vignettes of surgical-site infections.

Authors:  Gabriel Birgand; Didier Lepelletier; Gabriel Baron; Steve Barrett; Ann-Christin Breier; Cagri Buke; Ljiljana Markovic-Denic; Petra Gastmeier; Jan Kluytmans; Outi Lyytikainen; Elizabeth Sheridan; Emese Szilagyi; Evelina Tacconelli; Nicolas Troillet; Philippe Ravaud; Jean-Christophe Lucet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data.

Authors:  Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Patient and Provider Preferences for Monitoring Surgical Wounds Using an mHealth App: A Formative Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Shilpa Sreedharan; Lynne S Nemeth; Jason Hirsch; Heather L Evans
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.150

3.  The disproportionate burden of electronic health record messages with image attachments in dermatology.

Authors:  Ethan D Borre; Matilda W Nicholas
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 15.487

4.  Prospective observational study of abdominal wall reconstruction with THT technique in primary midline defects with diastasis recti: clinical and functional outcomes in 110 consecutive patients.

Authors:  A Carrara; M Catarci; L Fabris; M Zuolo; L Pellecchia; P Moscatelli; A Dorna; M Motter; R Pertile; G Tirone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Engaging Patients in Co-Design of Mobile Health Tools for Surgical Site Infection Surveillance: Implications for Research and Implementation.

Authors:  Danielle C Lavallee; Jenney R Lee; John L Semple; William B Lober; Heather L Evans
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.150

6.  Efficacy and satisfaction of asynchronous TeleHealth care compared to in-person visits following colorectal surgical resection.

Authors:  Catherine C Beauharnais; Susanna S Hill; Paul R Sturrock; Jennifer S Davids; Karim Alavi; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  mHealth-community health worker telemedicine intervention for surgical site infection diagnosis: a prospective study among women delivering via caesarean section in rural Rwanda.

Authors:  Theoneste Nkurunziza; Wendy Williams; Fredrick Kateera; Robert Riviello; Anne Niyigena; Elizabeth Miranda; Laban Bikorimana; Jonathan Nkurunziza; Lotta Velin; Andrea S Goodman; Alex Matousek; Stefanie J Klug; Erick Gaju; Bethany L Hedt-Gauthier
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-07

8.  European Hernia Society (EHS) guidance for the management of adult patients with a hernia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  C Stabilini; B East; R Fortelny; J-F Gillion; R Lorenz; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; F Muysoms; M Pawlak; W Reinpold; M Simons; A C de Beaux
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Can a smartphone-delivered tool facilitate the assessment of surgical site infection and result in earlier treatment? Tracking wound infection with smartphone technology (TWIST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial in emergency surgery patients.

Authors:  Kenneth A McLean; Katie E Mountain; Catherine A Shaw; Thomas M Drake; Riinu Ots; Stephen R Knight; Cameron J Fairfield; Alessandro Sgrò; Richard J E Skipworth; Stephen J Wigmore; Mark A Potter; Ewen M Harrison
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Expert commentary on the challenges and opportunities for surgical site infection prevention through implementation of evidence-based guidelines in the Asia-Pacific Region.

Authors:  K Morikane; P L Russo; K Y Lee; M Chakravarthy; M L Ling; E Saguil; M Spencer; W Danker; A Seno; E Edmiston Charles
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.887

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.