OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of digital images captured by parents or guardians and sent to clinicians for assessment of wounds after pediatric ambulatory surgery. METHODS: Subjects with digital images of post-operative wounds were identified as part of an on-going cohort study of infections after ambulatory surgery within a large pediatric healthcare system. We performed a structured review of the electronic health record (EHR) to determine how digital images were documented in the EHR and used in clinical care. RESULTS: We identified 166 patients whose parent or guardian reported sending a digital image of the wound to the clinician after surgery. A corresponding digital image was located in the EHR in only 121 of these encounters. A change in clinical management was documented in 20% of these encounters, including referral for in-person evaluation of the wound and antibiotic prescription. CONCLUSION: Clinical teams have developed ad hoc workflows to use digital images to evaluate post-operative pediatric surgical patients. Because the use of digital images to support follow-up care after ambulatory surgery is likely to increase, it is important that high-quality images are captured and documented appropriately in the EHR to ensure privacy, security, and a high-level of care.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of digital images captured by parents or guardians and sent to clinicians for assessment of wounds after pediatric ambulatory surgery. METHODS: Subjects with digital images of post-operative wounds were identified as part of an on-going cohort study of infections after ambulatory surgery within a large pediatric healthcare system. We performed a structured review of the electronic health record (EHR) to determine how digital images were documented in the EHR and used in clinical care. RESULTS: We identified 166 patients whose parent or guardian reported sending a digital image of the wound to the clinician after surgery. A corresponding digital image was located in the EHR in only 121 of these encounters. A change in clinical management was documented in 20% of these encounters, including referral for in-person evaluation of the wound and antibiotic prescription. CONCLUSION: Clinical teams have developed ad hoc workflows to use digital images to evaluate post-operative pediatric surgical patients. Because the use of digital images to support follow-up care after ambulatory surgery is likely to increase, it is important that high-quality images are captured and documented appropriately in the EHR to ensure privacy, security, and a high-level of care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ambulatory care information systems; clinical images; patient records; surgery; workflow
Authors: Ralph Peter Braun; Jean L Vecchietti; Luc Thomas; Christa Prins; Lars E French; Aron J Gewirtzman; Jean-Hilaire Saurat; Denis Salomon Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2005-02
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Jason T Wiseman; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Maggie L Barnes; Adela Tomsejova; R Scott Saunders; K Craig Kent Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Marcene R McVay; Karen R Kelley; Donna L Mathews; Richard J Jackson; Evan R Kokoska; Samuel D Smith Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: D J Wirthlin; S Buradagunta; R A Edwards; D C Brewster; R P Cambria; J P Gertler; G M LaMuraglia; D E Jordan; J C Kvedar; W M Abbott Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Adam Landman; Srinivas Emani; Narath Carlile; David I Rosenthal; Simon Semakov; Daniel J Pallin; Eric G Poon Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2015-01-02 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Richmond M Castillo; Grace Y Kim; Kirk D Wyatt; Christine M Lohse; Thomas R Hellmich Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Kirk D Wyatt; Brian N Willaert; Christine M Lohse; Peter J Pallagi; James A Yiannias; Thomas R Hellmich Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 2.342