Jarrad H Van Stan1, Daryush D Mehta2, Steven M Zeitels3, James A Burns3, Anca M Barbu3, Robert E Hillman4. 1. Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Center for Laryngeal Surgery and Voice Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Hillman.Robert@MGH.HARVARD.EDU.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Clinical management of phonotraumatic vocal fold lesions (nodules, polyps) is based largely on assumptions that abnormalities in habitual levels of sound pressure level (SPL), fundamental frequency (f0), and/or amount of voice use play a major role in lesion development and chronic persistence. This study used ambulatory voice monitoring to evaluate if significant differences in voice use exist between patients with phonotraumatic lesions and normal matched controls. METHODS: Subjects were 70 adult females: 35 with vocal fold nodules or polyps and 35 age-, sex-, and occupation-matched normal individuals. Weeklong summary statistics of voice use were computed from anterior neck surface acceleration recorded using a smartphone-based ambulatory voice monitor. RESULTS: Paired t tests and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests resulted in no statistically significant differences between patients and matched controls regarding average measures of SPL, f0, vocal dose measures, and voicing/voice rest periods. Paired t tests comparing f0 variability between the groups resulted in statistically significant differences with moderate effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with phonotraumatic lesions did not exhibit differences in average ambulatory measures of vocal behavior when compared with matched controls. More refined characterizations of underlying phonatory mechanisms and other potentially contributing causes are warranted to better understand risk factors associated with phonotraumatic lesions.
OBJECTIVES: Clinical management of phonotraumatic vocal fold lesions (nodules, polyps) is based largely on assumptions that abnormalities in habitual levels of sound pressure level (SPL), fundamental frequency (f0), and/or amount of voice use play a major role in lesion development and chronic persistence. This study used ambulatory voice monitoring to evaluate if significant differences in voice use exist between patients with phonotraumatic lesions and normal matched controls. METHODS: Subjects were 70 adult females: 35 with vocal fold nodules or polyps and 35 age-, sex-, and occupation-matched normal individuals. Weeklong summary statistics of voice use were computed from anterior neck surface acceleration recorded using a smartphone-based ambulatory voice monitor. RESULTS: Paired t tests and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests resulted in no statistically significant differences between patients and matched controls regarding average measures of SPL, f0, vocal dose measures, and voicing/voice rest periods. Paired t tests comparing f0 variability between the groups resulted in statistically significant differences with moderate effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with phonotraumatic lesions did not exhibit differences in average ambulatory measures of vocal behavior when compared with matched controls. More refined characterizations of underlying phonatory mechanisms and other potentially contributing causes are warranted to better understand risk factors associated with phonotraumatic lesions.
Authors: Andrew J Ortiz; Laura E Toles; Katherine L Marks; Silvia Capobianco; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman; Jarrad H Van Stan Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Daryush D Mehta; Víctor M Espinoza; Jarrad H Van Stan; Matías Zañartu; Robert E Hillman Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Andrew J Ortiz; James A Burns; Laura E Toles; Katherine L Marks; Mark Vangel; Tiffiny Hron; Steven Zeitels; Robert E Hillman Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; Annie B Fox; Laura E Toles; Daryush D Mehta Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Dagmar Sternad; Robert Petit; Robert E Hillman Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Daryush D Mehta; Harold A Cheyne; Asa Wehner; James T Heaton; Robert E Hillman Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Jon Z Lin; Víctor M Espinoza; Katherine L Marks; Matías Zañartu; Daryush D Mehta Journal: IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 6.856
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert J Petit; Dagmar Sternad; Jason Muise; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 2.408