Literature DB >> 26024911

Average Ambulatory Measures of Sound Pressure Level, Fundamental Frequency, and Vocal Dose Do Not Differ Between Adult Females With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Control Subjects.

Jarrad H Van Stan1, Daryush D Mehta2, Steven M Zeitels3, James A Burns3, Anca M Barbu3, Robert E Hillman4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Clinical management of phonotraumatic vocal fold lesions (nodules, polyps) is based largely on assumptions that abnormalities in habitual levels of sound pressure level (SPL), fundamental frequency (f0), and/or amount of voice use play a major role in lesion development and chronic persistence. This study used ambulatory voice monitoring to evaluate if significant differences in voice use exist between patients with phonotraumatic lesions and normal matched controls.
METHODS: Subjects were 70 adult females: 35 with vocal fold nodules or polyps and 35 age-, sex-, and occupation-matched normal individuals. Weeklong summary statistics of voice use were computed from anterior neck surface acceleration recorded using a smartphone-based ambulatory voice monitor.
RESULTS: Paired t tests and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests resulted in no statistically significant differences between patients and matched controls regarding average measures of SPL, f0, vocal dose measures, and voicing/voice rest periods. Paired t tests comparing f0 variability between the groups resulted in statistically significant differences with moderate effect sizes.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with phonotraumatic lesions did not exhibit differences in average ambulatory measures of vocal behavior when compared with matched controls. More refined characterizations of underlying phonatory mechanisms and other potentially contributing causes are warranted to better understand risk factors associated with phonotraumatic lesions.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory voice monitoring; occupational voice use; vocal fold nodules; vocal fold polyps; vocal loading; voice disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26024911      PMCID: PMC4605885          DOI: 10.1177/0003489415589363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  59 in total

1.  Aerodynamic and acoustic voice measurements of patients with vocal nodules: variation in baseline and changes across voice therapy.

Authors:  Eva B Holmberg; Patricia Doyle; Joseph S Perkell; Britta Hammarberg; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Comparison of voice-use profiles between elementary classroom and music teachers.

Authors:  Sharon L Morrow; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Adaptation of a Pocket PC for use as a wearable voice dosimeter.

Authors:  Peter S Popolo; Jan G Svec; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Ambulatory phonation monitoring in a sample of 92 call center operators.

Authors:  Giovanna Cantarella; Elisabetta Iofrida; Paola Boria; Simone Giordano; Oriana Binatti; Lorenzo Pignataro; Claudia Manfredi; Stella Forti; Philippe Dejonckere
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Assessment of effectiveness of acoustic analysis of voice for monitoring the evolution of vocal nodules after vocal treatment.

Authors:  Wasim Elhendi Halawa; Antonio Rodríguez Fernández Freire; Irene Vázquez Muñoz; Sofía Santos Pérez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Voice therapy and vocal nodules in adults.

Authors:  Rebecca Leonard
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL).

Authors:  N D Hogikyan; G Sethuraman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Objective voice analysis for vocal polyps following microlaryngeal phonosurgery.

Authors:  K C Toran; B K Vaidhya
Journal:  Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun

9.  Quantifying vocal fatigue recovery: dynamic vocal recovery trajectories after a vocal loading exercise.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Phonomicrosurgery in singers and performing artists: treatment outcomes, management theories, and future directions.

Authors:  Steven M Zeitels; Robert E Hillman; Rosemary Desloge; Marcello Mauri; Patricia B Doyle
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2002-12
View more
  20 in total

1.  Automatic speech and singing classification in ambulatory recordings for normal and disordered voices.

Authors:  Andrew J Ortiz; Laura E Toles; Katherine L Marks; Silvia Capobianco; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman; Jarrad H Van Stan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The difference between first and second harmonic amplitudes correlates between glottal airflow and neck-surface accelerometer signals during phonation.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Víctor M Espinoza; Jarrad H Van Stan; Matías Zañartu; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Differences in Weeklong Ambulatory Vocal Behavior Between Female Patients With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Controls.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Andrew J Ortiz; James A Burns; Laura E Toles; Katherine L Marks; Mark Vangel; Tiffiny Hron; Steven Zeitels; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Prolonged phonation impairs the integrity and barrier function of porcine vocal fold epithelium: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Kieran Paddock; Adriana Chou; Austin Scholp; Ting Gong; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Impact of Nonmodal Phonation on Estimates of Subglottal Pressure From Neck-Surface Acceleration in Healthy Speakers.

Authors:  Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; Annie B Fox; Laura E Toles; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback: Relative Frequency and Summary Feedback Effects on Performance and Retention of Reduced Vocal Intensity in the Daily Lives of Participants With Normal Voices.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Dagmar Sternad; Robert Petit; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Accuracy of Self-Reported Estimates of Daily Voice Use in Adults With Normal and Disordered Voices.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Harold A Cheyne; Asa Wehner; James T Heaton; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Improved subglottal pressure estimation from neck-surface vibration in healthy speakers producing non-modal phonation.

Authors:  Jon Z Lin; Víctor M Espinoza; Katherine L Marks; Matías Zañartu; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 6.856

9.  Estimating Subglottal Pressure From Neck-Surface Acceleration During Normal Voice Production.

Authors:  Amanda S Fryd; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Integration of Motor Learning Principles Into Real-Time Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback and Example Implementation Via a Clinical Case Study With Vocal Fold Nodules.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert J Petit; Dagmar Sternad; Jason Muise; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.