Literature DB >> 24061570

Assessment of effectiveness of acoustic analysis of voice for monitoring the evolution of vocal nodules after vocal treatment.

Wasim Elhendi Halawa1, Antonio Rodríguez Fernández Freire, Irene Vázquez Muñoz, Sofía Santos Pérez.   

Abstract

In the present study, we report the results of acoustic analysis of voice in 97 patients diagnosed with vocal nodules before and after the vocal logopedic treatment, to evaluate its effectiveness in monitoring the evolution. We analyzed five parameters: the mean fundamental frequency (F0) and its standard deviation, jitter, shimmer, and normalized noise energy (NNE). Our results indicate that most patients showed a reduction of fundamental frequency, an increase of perturbation (jitter and shimmer), and an increase of NNE before the treatment. We did not find any statistically significant relationship between previous values of the five parameters analyzed and the clinical course. We did not find significant differences between the two groups (with and without clinical improvement) in the evolution of any of the five parameters, although these differences were greater in the case of jitter. We conclude that the acoustic analysis of voice can be useful as a complementary tool in the diagnosis of vocal nodules, but the parameter values analyzed before treatment did not correlate with the clinical course and we believe that its usefulness in the evaluation of results after the vocal treatment is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24061570     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2685-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  21 in total

1.  Re: Evaluation of voice quality.

Authors:  P Carding; E Carlson; R Epstein; L Mathieson; C Shewell
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.

Authors:  P Yu; M Ouaknine; J Revis; A Giovanni
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Efficacy of a behaviorally based voice therapy protocol for vocal nodules.

Authors:  E B Holmberg; R E Hillman; B Hammarberg; M Södersten; P Doyle
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Self-organizing map for the classification of normal and disordered female voices.

Authors:  D E Callan; R D Kent; N Roy; S M Tasko
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  [Computer use in voice analysis: clinical applications].

Authors:  A Nieto; A J del Palacio; F J Lorenzo; A Vegas; I Cobeta
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

6.  Acoustic prediction of severity in commonly occurring voice problems.

Authors:  V Wolfe; J Fitch; R Cornell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-04

7.  Acoustic measures of dysphonic severity across and within voice types.

Authors:  V Wolfe; J Fitch; D Martin
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 0.849

8.  Normalized noise energy as an acoustic measure to evaluate pathologic voice.

Authors:  H Kasuya; S Ogawa; K Mashima; S Ebihara
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pathologic voice type and the acoustic prediction of severity.

Authors:  D Martin; J Fitch; V Wolfe
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-08

10.  [Objective study of the voice in a normal population and in dysphonia caused by nodules and vocal polyps].

Authors:  J C Casado Morente; J A Adrián Torres; M Conde Jiménez; D Piédrola Maroto; V Povedano Rodríguez; E Muñoz Gomariz; E Cantillo Baños; A Jurado Ramos
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2001 Aug-Sep
View more
  2 in total

1.  Average Ambulatory Measures of Sound Pressure Level, Fundamental Frequency, and Vocal Dose Do Not Differ Between Adult Females With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Control Subjects.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns; Anca M Barbu; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Parameters and Scales Used to Assess and Report Findings From Stroboscopy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Heather Shaw Bonilha; Maude Desjardins; Kendrea L Garand; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.009

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.