Literature DB >> 12498380

Phonomicrosurgery in singers and performing artists: treatment outcomes, management theories, and future directions.

Steven M Zeitels1, Robert E Hillman, Rosemary Desloge, Marcello Mauri, Patricia B Doyle.   

Abstract

Phonomicrosurgery in performing artists has historically been approached with great trepidation, and vocal outcome data are sparse. The vocal liability of surgically disturbing the superficial lamina propria (SLP) and epithelium must be balanced with the inherent detrimental vocal effect of the lesion(s). A prospective investigation was performed on 185 performing artists who underwent phonomicrosurgical resection of 365 lesions: 201 nodules, 71 polyps, 66 varices and ectasias, 13 cysts, 8 keratotic lesions, 2 granulomas, 2 Reinke's edema, and 2 papillomas. Nearly all patients with SLP lesions reported improvement in their postsurgical vocal function. This subjective result was supported by objective acoustic and aerodynamic measures. All postsurgical objective vocal function measures fell within normal limits, including a few that displayed presurgical abnormalities. However, given the relative insensitivity of standard objective measures to assess higher-level vocal performance-related factors, it is even more noteworthy that 8 of 24 objective measures displayed statistically significant postsurgical improvements in vocal function. Such changes in objective measures mostly reflect overall enhancement in the efficiency of voice production. Phonomicrosurgical resection of vocal fold lesions in performing artists is enjoying an expanding role because of a variety of improvements in diagnostic assessment, surgical instrumentation and techniques, and specialized rehabilitation. Most of these lesions are the result of phonotrauma and arise within the SLP. Successful management depends on prudent patient selection and counseling, ultraprecise technique, and vigorqus vocal rehabilitation. Furthermore, an understanding of the vocal function and dysfunction of this high-performance population provides all otolaryngologists who manage laryngeal problems with valuable information that they can extrapolate for use in their practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12498380     DOI: 10.1177/0003489402111s1203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  25 in total

1.  High-speed videoendoscopic analysis of relationships between cepstral-based acoustic measures and voice production mechanisms in patients undergoing phonomicrosurgery.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns; Aaron D Friedman; Dimitar D Deliyski; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Differences in Weeklong Ambulatory Vocal Behavior Between Female Patients With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Controls.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Andrew J Ortiz; James A Burns; Laura E Toles; Katherine L Marks; Mark Vangel; Tiffiny Hron; Steven Zeitels; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Dynamic imaging of vocal fold oscillation with four-dimensional optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  James B Kobler; Ernest W Chang; Steven M Zeitels; Seok-Hyun Yun
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Tunable mechanical stability and deformation response of a resilin-based elastomer.

Authors:  Linqing Li; Sean Teller; Rodney J Clifton; Xinqiao Jia; Kristi L Kiick
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 6.988

5.  Impact of Nonmodal Phonation on Estimates of Subglottal Pressure From Neck-Surface Acceleration in Healthy Speakers.

Authors:  Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; Annie B Fox; Laura E Toles; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Average Ambulatory Measures of Sound Pressure Level, Fundamental Frequency, and Vocal Dose Do Not Differ Between Adult Females With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Control Subjects.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns; Anca M Barbu; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Viscoelastic measurements of vocal folds using the linear skin rheometer.

Authors:  Seth H Dailey; Ichiro Tateya; Douglas Montequin; Nathan V Welham; Eric Goodyer
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Advances in biomimetic regeneration of elastic matrix structures.

Authors:  Balakrishnan Sivaraman; Chris A Bashur; Anand Ramamurthi
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.617

9.  Objective acoustic analysis of pathological voices from patients with vocal nodules and polyps.

Authors:  Jack J Jiang; Yu Zhang; Julia MacCallum; Alicia Sprecher; Liang Zhou
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 0.849

Review 10.  Tissue engineering-based therapeutic strategies for vocal fold repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Linqing Li; Jeanna M Stiadle; Hang K Lau; Aidan B Zerdoum; Xinqiao Jia; Susan L Thibeault; Kristi L Kiick
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.