Literature DB >> 20359861

Comparison of voice-use profiles between elementary classroom and music teachers.

Sharon L Morrow1, Nadine P Connor.   

Abstract

Among teachers, music teachers are roughly four times more likely than classroom teachers to develop voice-related problems. Although it has been established that music teachers use their voices at high intensities and durations in the course of their workday, voice-use profiles concerning the amount and intensity of vocal use and vocal load have neither been quantified nor has vocal load for music teachers been compared with classroom teachers using these same voice-use parameters. In this study, total phonation time, fundamental frequency (F₀), and vocal intensity (dB SPL [sound pressure level]) were measured or estimated directly using a KayPENTAX Ambulatory Phonation Monitor (KayPENTAX, Lincoln Park, NJ). Vocal load was calculated as cycle and distance dose, as defined by Švec et al (2003), which integrates total phonation time, F₀, and vocal intensity. Twelve participants (n = 7 elementary music teachers and n = 5 elementary classroom teachers) were monitored during five full teaching days of one workweek to determine average vocal load for these two groups of teachers. Statistically significant differences in all measures were found between the two groups (P < 0.05) with large effect sizes for all parameters. These results suggest that typical vocal loads for music teachers are substantially higher than those experienced by classroom teachers (P < 0.01). This study suggests that reducing vocal load may have immediate clinical and educational benefits in vocal health in music teachers.
Copyright © 2011 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20359861     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of vocal fatigue and vocal tract discomfort between teachers of normal pupils and teachers of mentally disabled pupils.

Authors:  Hassan Khoramshahi; Ali Dehqan; Ronald Callaway Scherer; Zahra Sharifi; Shayan Ahmadi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Learning to detect vocal hyperfunction from ambulatory neck-surface acceleration features: initial results for vocal fold nodules.

Authors:  Marzyeh Ghassemi; Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Matías Zañartu; Harold A Cheyne; Robert E Hillman; John V Guttag
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Assessments of Voice Use and Voice Quality Among College/University Singing Students Ages 18-24 Through Ambulatory Monitoring With a Full Accelerometer Signal.

Authors:  Matthew J Schloneger; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Differences in Weeklong Ambulatory Vocal Behavior Between Female Patients With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Controls.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Andrew J Ortiz; James A Burns; Laura E Toles; Katherine L Marks; Mark Vangel; Tiffiny Hron; Steven Zeitels; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Average Ambulatory Measures of Sound Pressure Level, Fundamental Frequency, and Vocal Dose Do Not Differ Between Adult Females With Phonotraumatic Lesions and Matched Control Subjects.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Steven M Zeitels; James A Burns; Anca M Barbu; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Results of a Voice-Related Survey of Physical Education Student Teachers.

Authors:  Elizabeth U Grillo; Jenna N Brosious
Journal:  Commun Disord Q       Date:  2018-05-22

7.  The use and role of the Ambulatory Phonation Monitor (APM) in voice assessment.

Authors:  A Nacci; B Fattori; V Mancini; E Panicucci; F Ursino; F M Cartaino; S Berrettini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Exercise Science and the Vocalist.

Authors:  Aaron M Johnson; Mary J Sandage
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Exercise Science and the Vocalist.

Authors:  Aaron M Johnson; Mary J Sandage
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Voice symptoms in teachers during distance teaching: a survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland.

Authors:  M Patjas; H Vertanen-Greis; P Pietarinen; A Geneid
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 2.503

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.