Literature DB >> 26024307

Articular Cartilage of the Human Knee Joint: In Vivo Multicomponent T2 Analysis at 3.0 T.

Fang Liu1, Kwang Won Choi1, Alexey Samsonov1, Richard G Spencer1, John J Wilson1, Walter F Block1, Richard Kijowski1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare multicomponent T2 parameters of the articular cartilage of the knee joint measured by using multicomponent driven equilibrium single-shot observation of T1 and T2 (mcDESPOT) in asymptomatic volunteers and patients with osteoarthritis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was performed with institutional review board approval and with written informed consent from all subjects. The mcDESPOT sequence was performed in the knee joint of 13 asymptomatic volunteers and 14 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Single-component T2 (T2(Single)), T2 of the fast-relaxing water component (T2F) and of the slow-relaxing water component (T2S), and the fraction of the fast-relaxing water component (F(F)) of cartilage were measured. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and multivariate linear regression models were used to compare mcDESPOT parameters between volunteers and patients with osteoarthritis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess diagnostic performance with mcDESPOT parameters for distinguishing morphologically normal cartilage from morphologically degenerative cartilage identified at magnetic resonance imaging in eight cartilage subsections of the knee joint.
RESULTS: Higher cartilage T2(Single) (P < .001), lower cartilage F(F) (P < .001), and similar cartilage T2F (P = .079) and T2S (P = .124) values were seen in patients with osteoarthritis compared with those in asymptomatic volunteers. Differences in T2(Single) and F(F) remained significant (P < .05) after consideration of age differences between groups of subjects. Diagnostic performance was higher with F(F) than with T2(Single) for distinguishing between normal and degenerative cartilage (P < .05), with greater areas under the curve at receiver operating characteristic analysis.
CONCLUSION: Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee had significantly higher cartilage T2(Single) and significantly lower cartilage F(F) than did asymptomatic volunteers, and receiver operating characteristic analysis results suggested that F(F) may allow greater diagnostic performance than that with T2(Single) for distinguishing between normal and degenerative cartilage. © RSNA, 2015

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26024307      PMCID: PMC4627437          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  48 in total

1.  Mapping proteoglycan-bound water in cartilage: Improved specificity of matrix assessment using multiexponential transverse relaxation analysis.

Authors:  David A Reiter; Remigio A Roque; Ping-Chang Lin; Onyi Irrechukwu; Stephen Doty; Dan L Longo; Nancy Pleshko; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Multicomponent T2* mapping of knee cartilage: technical feasibility ex vivo.

Authors:  Yongxian Qian; Ashley A Williams; Constance R Chu; Fernando E Boada
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Correction of main and transmit magnetic field (B0 and B1) inhomogeneity effects in multicomponent-driven equilibrium single-pulse observation of T1 and T2.

Authors:  Sean C L Deoni
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Quantitative MRI using T1ρ and T2 in human osteoarthritic cartilage specimens: correlation with biochemical measurements and histology.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Li; Jonathan Cheng; Katrina Lin; Ehsan Saadat; Radu I Bolbos; Björn Jobke; Michael D Ries; Andrew Horvai; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Improved specificity of cartilage matrix evaluation using multiexponential transverse relaxation analysis applied to pathomimetically degraded cartilage.

Authors:  David A Reiter; Remigio A Roque; Ping-Chang Lin; Stephen B Doty; Nancy Pleshko; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Dependencies of multi-component T2 and T1ρ relaxation on the anisotropy of collagen fibrils in bovine nasal cartilage.

Authors:  Nian Wang; Yang Xia
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  T1ρ and T2 mapping reveal the in vivo extracellular matrix of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nishioka; Jun Hirose; Eiichi Nakamura; Yasunari Oniki; Koji Takada; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Hiroshi Mizuta
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Functional cartilage MRI T2 mapping: evaluating the effect of age and training on knee cartilage response to running.

Authors:  T J Mosher; Y Liu; C M Torok
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  On the measurement of multi-component T2 relaxation in cartilage by MR spectroscopy and imaging.

Authors:  ShaoKuan Zheng; Yang Xia
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Quantitative T2 mapping of the patella at 3.0T is sensitive to early cartilage degeneration, but also to loading of the knee.

Authors:  S Apprich; T C Mamisch; G H Welsch; D Stelzeneder; C Albers; U Totzke; S Trattnig
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  11 in total

1.  Fast multicomponent 3D-T relaxometry.

Authors:  Marcelo V W Zibetti; Elias S Helou; Azadeh Sharafi; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Clinical high-resolution mapping of the proteoglycan-bound water fraction in articular cartilage of the human knee joint.

Authors:  Mustapha Bouhrara; David A Reiter; Kyle W Sexton; Christopher M Bergeron; Linda M Zukley; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Biexponential T2 relaxation estimation of human knee cartilage in vivo at 3T.

Authors:  Azadeh Sharafi; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of knee joint anatomy.

Authors:  Zhaoye Zhou; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski; Fang Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Capturing fast relaxing spins with SWIFT adiabatic rotating frame spin-lattice relaxation (T1ρ) mapping.

Authors:  J Zhang; M J Nissi; D Idiyatullin; S Michaeli; M Garwood; J Ellermann
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Maturation-Related Changes in T2 Relaxation Times of Cartilage and Meniscus of the Pediatric Knee Joint at 3 T.

Authors:  Jie C Nguyen; Hailey Allen; Fang Liu; Kaitlin M Woo; Zhaoye Zhou; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Bi-component T2 mapping correlates with articular cartilage material properties.

Authors:  Matthew M Grondin; Fang Liu; Michael F Vignos; Alexey Samsonov; Wan-Ju Li; Richard Kijowski; Corinne R Henak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Rapid MR relaxometry using deep learning: An overview of current techniques and emerging trends.

Authors:  Li Feng; Dan Ma; Fang Liu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 9.  MR Parametric Mapping as a Biomarker of Early Joint Degeneration.

Authors:  Eric Y Chang; Yajun Ma; Jiang Du
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  A forgotten retained drain inside a knee for 10 years: A case report.

Authors:  Saeed Koaban; Raheef Alatassi; Nawaf Alogayyel
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.