T J Mosher1, Y Liu, C M Torok. 1. Penn State Center for NMR Research, Department of Radiology, The Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. tmosher@psu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize effects of age and physical activity level on cartilage thickness and T2 response immediately after running. DESIGN: Institutional review board approval was obtained and all subjects provided informed consent prior to study participation. Cartilage thickness and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 values of 22 marathon runners and 15 sedentary controls were compared before and after 30 min of running. Runner and control groups were stratified by age<or=45 and >or=46 years. Multi-echo [(Time to Repetition (TR)/Time to Echo (TE) 1500 ms/9-109 ms)] MR images obtained using a 3.0 T scanner were used to calculate thickness and T2 values from the central femoral and tibial cartilage. Baseline cartilage T2 values, and change in cartilage thickness and T2 values after running were compared between the four groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: After running MRI T2 values decreased in superficial femoral (2 ms-4 ms) and tibial (1 ms-3 ms) cartilage along with a decrease in cartilage thickness: (femoral: 4%-8%, tibial: 0%-12%). Smaller decrease in cartilage T2 values were observed in the middle zone of cartilage, and no change was observed in the deepest layer. There was no difference cartilage deformation or T2 response to running as a function of age or level of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Running results in a measurable decrease in cartilage thickness and MRI T2 values of superficial cartilage consistent with greater compressibility of the superficial cartilage layer. Age and level of physical activity did not alter the T2 response to running. Copyright 2009 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize effects of age and physical activity level on cartilage thickness and T2 response immediately after running. DESIGN: Institutional review board approval was obtained and all subjects provided informed consent prior to study participation. Cartilage thickness and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 values of 22 marathon runners and 15 sedentary controls were compared before and after 30 min of running. Runner and control groups were stratified by age<or=45 and >or=46 years. Multi-echo [(Time to Repetition (TR)/Time to Echo (TE) 1500 ms/9-109 ms)] MR images obtained using a 3.0 T scanner were used to calculate thickness and T2 values from the central femoral and tibial cartilage. Baseline cartilage T2 values, and change in cartilage thickness and T2 values after running were compared between the four groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: After running MRI T2 values decreased in superficial femoral (2 ms-4 ms) and tibial (1 ms-3 ms) cartilage along with a decrease in cartilage thickness: (femoral: 4%-8%, tibial: 0%-12%). Smaller decrease in cartilage T2 values were observed in the middle zone of cartilage, and no change was observed in the deepest layer. There was no difference cartilage deformation or T2 response to running as a function of age or level of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Running results in a measurable decrease in cartilage thickness and MRI T2 values of superficial cartilage consistent with greater compressibility of the superficial cartilage layer. Age and level of physical activity did not alter the T2 response to running. Copyright 2009 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: F Eckstein; G Ateshian; R Burgkart; D Burstein; F Cicuttini; B Dardzinski; M Gray; T M Link; S Majumdar; T Mosher; C Peterfy; S Totterman; J Waterton; C S Winalski; D Felson Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2006-05-26 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: C Herberhold; S Faber; T Stammberger; M Steinlechner; R Putz; K H Englmeier; M Reiser; F Eckstein Journal: J Biomech Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Timothy J Mosher; Harvey E Smith; Christopher Collins; Yi Liu; Jason Hancy; Bernard J Dardzinski; Michael B Smith Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-11-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Markus A Kessler; Christian Glaser; Sylvia Tittel; Maximilian Reiser; Andreas B Imhoff Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Robert Stahl; Anthony Luke; Xiaojuan Li; Julio Carballido-Gamio; C Benjamin Ma; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-08-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: K Subburaj; R B Souza; C Stehling; B T Wyman; M-P Le Graverand-Gastineau; T M Link; X Li; S Majumdar Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Richard B Souza; Thomas Baum; Samuel Wu; Brian T Feeley; Nancy Kadel; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Thomas Baum; Christoph Stehling; Gabby B Joseph; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Christina Müller-Höcker; Michael C Nevitt; John Lynch; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Goetz H Welsch; Sebastian Apprich; Stefan Zbyn; Tallal C Mamisch; Vladimir Mlynarik; Klaus Scheffler; Oliver Bieri; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-12-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Karupppasamy Subburaj; Deepak Kumar; Richard B Souza; Hamza Alizai; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Gregory Chang; Ding Xia; Orrin Sherman; Eric Strauss; Laith Jazrawi; Michael P Recht; Ravinder R Regatte Journal: MAGMA Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 2.310