| Literature DB >> 26019189 |
V Bossuyt1, E Provenzano2, W F Symmans3, J C Boughey4, C Coles5, G Curigliano6, J M Dixon7, L J Esserman8, G Fastner9, T Kuehn10, F Peintinger11, G von Minckwitz12, J White13, W Yang14, S Badve15, C Denkert16, G MacGrogan17, F Penault-Llorca18, G Viale19, D Cameron20.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) provides the unique opportunity to assess response to treatment after months rather than years of follow-up. However, significant variability exists in methods of pathologic assessment of response to NAST, and thus its interpretation for subsequent clinical decisions. Our international multidisciplinary working group was convened by the Breast International Group-North American Breast Cancer Group (BIG-NABCG) collaboration and tasked to recommend practical methods for standardized evaluation of the post-NAST surgical breast cancer specimen for clinical trials that promote accurate and reliable designation of pathologic complete response (pCR) and meaningful characterization of residual disease. Recommendations include multidisciplinary communication; clinical marking of the tumor site (clips); and radiologic, photographic, or pictorial imaging of the sliced specimen, to map the tissue sections and reconcile macroscopic and microscopic findings. The information required to define pCR (ypT0/is ypN0 or ypT0 yp N0), residual ypT and ypN stage using the current AJCC/UICC system, and the Residual Cancer Burden system were recommended for quantification of residual disease in clinical trials.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; neoadjuvant systemic therapy; pathologic assessment; pathologic complete response; residual disease; response evaluation
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26019189 PMCID: PMC4804123 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Oncol ISSN: 0923-7534 Impact factor: 32.976