Literature DB >> 15611510

Randomized parallel study of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with breast cancer.

Véronique Diéras1, Pierre Fumoleau, Gilles Romieu, Michèle Tubiana-Hulin, Moïse Namer, Louis Mauriac, Jean-Paul Guastalla, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Pierre Kerbrat, Philippe Maillart, Frédérique Pénault-Llorca, Marc Buyse, Pierre Pouillart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This randomized, noncomparative, parallel-group study was designed to evaluate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of combined doxorubicin plus paclitaxel (AP) and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated breast cancer who were unsuitable for conservative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients with T2-3, N0-1, M0 disease were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive preoperative chemotherapy with either doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour infusion (AP) or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (AC) every 3 weeks for 4 courses followed by surgery.
RESULTS: A pCR (eradication of invasive carcinoma in tumor and in axillary lymph nodes) was found in 16% and 10% of patients in the AP and AC arms, respectively, by study center pathologists, and in 8% and 6% of patients, respectively, by independent pathologists. Patients with pCRs tended to have unifocal disease, tumors with negative hormonal receptor status, and less differentiation (Scarff, Bloom, and Richardson scale grade 3). Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 58% and 45% of patients in the AP and AC arms, respectively. An objective clinical response was achieved in 89% of patients in the AP arm and 70% in the AC arm. At a median follow-up of 31 months, disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in patients who reached pCR versus those without pCR (91% v 70%).
CONCLUSION: The encouraging pathologic and clinical responses of patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel warrant additional investigation of paclitaxel in the neoadjuvant setting of breast cancer management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15611510     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  37 in total

1.  Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and weekly paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III breast cancer.

Authors:  David Aguiar Bujanda; Uriel Bohn Sarmiento; Miguel Angel Cabrera Suárez; Marta Pavcovich Ruiz; Miguel Angel Limeres González; José Aguiar Morales
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  The ever-evolving role of pathologists in the management of breast cancer with neoadjuvant treatment: recommendations based on the Spanish clinical experience.

Authors:  O Burgués; Mª Á López-García; B Pérez-Míes; P Santiago; B Vieites; J F García; V Peg
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Standardization of pathologic evaluation and reporting of postneoadjuvant specimens in clinical trials of breast cancer: recommendations from an international working group.

Authors:  Elena Provenzano; Veerle Bossuyt; Giuseppe Viale; David Cameron; Sunil Badve; Carsten Denkert; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Judy Boughey; Giuseppe Curigliano; J Michael Dixon; Laura Esserman; Gerd Fastner; Thorsten Kuehn; Florentia Peintinger; Gunter von Minckwitz; Julia White; Wei Yang; W Fraser Symmans
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Claude Touzery; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Bruno Coudert; Laurent Arnould; Christophe Boichot; Alexandre Cochet; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for "triple negative" breast cancer: a review of current practice and future outlook.

Authors:  Zeina Nahleh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Primary medical therapy and breast conservation treatment: the medical oncology perspective.

Authors:  Nan Soon Wong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

7.  A Phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin administered every 2 weeks as preoperative therapy for stage II or III breast cancer: NCCTG study N0338.

Authors:  Vivek Roy; Barbara A Pockaj; Jacob B Allred; Heidi Apsey; Donald W Northfelt; Daniel Nikcevich; Bassam Mattar; Edith A Perez
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Impact on Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura M Spring; Geoffrey Fell; Andrea Arfe; Lorenzo Trippa; Aditya Bardia; Chandni Sharma; Rachel Greenup; Kerry L Reynolds; Barbara L Smith; Brian Alexander; Beverly Moy; Steven J Isakoff; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Predictors of complete pathological response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Marcus C Tan; Fatema Al Mushawah; Feng Gao; Rebecca L Aft; William E Gillanders; Timothy J Eberlein; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Genetic heterogeneity beyond CYP2C8*3 does not explain differential sensitivity to paclitaxel-induced neuropathy.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; Siddharth Roy; John Jack; Alison A Motsinger-Reif; Amy Drobish; L Scott Clark; Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.