Literature DB >> 28135148

Long-Term Prognostic Risk After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Associated With Residual Cancer Burden and Breast Cancer Subtype.

W Fraser Symmans1, Caimiao Wei1, Rebekah Gould1, Xian Yu1, Ya Zhang1, Mei Liu1, Andrew Walls1, Alex Bousamra1, Maheshwari Ramineni1, Bruno Sinn1, Kelly Hunt1, Thomas A Buchholz1, Vicente Valero1, Aman U Buzdar1, Wei Yang1, Abenaa M Brewster1, Stacy Moulder1, Lajos Pusztai1, Christos Hatzis1, Gabriel N Hortobagyi1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the long-term prognosis in each phenotypic subset of breast cancer related to residual cancer burden (RCB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, or with concurrent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted treatment. Methods We conducted a pathologic review to measure the continuous RCB index (wherein pathologic complete response has RCB = 0; residual disease is categorized into three predefined classes of RCB index [RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III]), and yp-stage of residual disease. Patients were prospectively observed for survival. Three patient cohorts received paclitaxel (T) followed by fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (T/FAC): original development cohort (T/FAC-1), validation cohort (T/FAC-2), and independent validation cohort (T/FAC-3). Another validation cohort received FAC chemotherapy only, and a fifth cohort received concurrent trastuzumab (H) with sequential paclitaxel and fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC; H+T/FEC). Phenotypic subsets were defined by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status at diagnosis, classified as HR-positive/HER2-negative, HER2-positive (HR-negative/HER2-positive or HR-positive/HER2-positive), or triple receptor-negative. Relapse-free survival estimates were determined from Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Results Five cohorts (T/FAC-1 [n = 219], T/FAC-2 [n = 262], T/FAC-3 [n = 342], FAC [n = 132], and H+T/FEC [n = 203]) had median event-free follow-up of 13.5, 9.1, 6.8, 16.4, and 7.1 years, respectively. Continuous RCB index was prognostic within each phenotypic subset, independent of other clinical-pathologic variables. RCB classes stratified prognostic risk overall, within each phenotypic subset, and within yp-stage categories. Estimates of 10-year relapse-free survival rates in the four RCB classes (pathologic complete response, RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III) were 86%, 81%, 55%, and 23% for triple receptor-negative; 83%, 97%, 74%, and 52% for HR-positive/HER2-negative in the combined T/FAC cohorts; and 95%, 77%, 47%, and 21% in the H+T/FEC cohort. Conclusion RCB was prognostic for long-term survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in all three phenotypic subsets of breast cancer. Our institutional findings should be externally validated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28135148      PMCID: PMC5455352          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  28 in total

1.  Residual proliferative cancer burden to predict long-term outcome following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  A Sheri; I E Smith; S R Johnston; R A'Hern; A Nerurkar; R L Jones; M Hills; S Detre; S E Pinder; W F Symmans; M Dowsett
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Impact of treatment characteristics on response of different breast cancer phenotypes: pooled analysis of the German neo-adjuvant chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Michael Untch; Eveline Nüesch; Sibylle Loibl; Manfred Kaufmann; Sherko Kümmel; Peter A Fasching; Wolfgang Eiermann; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Serban Dan Costa; Keyur Mehta; Jörn Hilfrich; Christian Jackisch; Bernd Gerber; Andreas du Bois; Jens Huober; Claus Hanusch; Gottfried Konecny; Werner Fett; Elmar Stickeler; Nadia Harbeck; Volkmar Müller; Peter Jüni
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Getting more out of survival data by using the hazard function.

Authors:  Kenneth R Hess; Victor A Levin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Validation of a novel staging system for disease-specific survival in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Jacqueline S Jeruss; Susan L Tucker; Aparna Kolli; Lisa A Newman; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Thomas A Buchholz; Aysegul A Sahin; Janice N Cormier; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Utility of the CPS+EG staging system in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Frederik Marmé; Bianca Lederer; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Serban Dan Costa; Carsten Denkert; Holger Eidtmann; Bernd Gerber; Claus Hanusch; Jörn Hilfrich; Jens Huober; Christian Jackisch; Sherko Kümmel; Sibylle Loibl; Stefan Paepke; Michael Untch; Gunter von Minckwitz; Andreas Schneeweiss
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Standardization of pathologic evaluation and reporting of postneoadjuvant specimens in clinical trials of breast cancer: recommendations from an international working group.

Authors:  Elena Provenzano; Veerle Bossuyt; Giuseppe Viale; David Cameron; Sunil Badve; Carsten Denkert; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Judy Boughey; Giuseppe Curigliano; J Michael Dixon; Laura Esserman; Gerd Fastner; Thorsten Kuehn; Florentia Peintinger; Gunter von Minckwitz; Julia White; Wei Yang; W Fraser Symmans
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Hormone receptor status and pathologic response of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab.

Authors:  F Peintinger; A U Buzdar; H M Kuerer; J A Mejia; C Hatzis; A M Gonzalez-Angulo; L Pusztai; F J Esteva; S S Dawood; M C Green; G N Hortobagyi; W F Symmans
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Relationship between Complete Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Christos Hatzis; W Fraser Symmans; Ya Zhang; Rebekah E Gould; Stacy L Moulder; Kelly K Hunt; Maysa Abu-Khalaf; Erin W Hofstatter; Donald Lannin; Anees B Chagpar; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Vera J Suman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Henry M Kuerer; Monet Bowling; Teresa S Flippo-Morton; David R Byrd; David W Ollila; Thomas B Julian; Sarah A McLaughlin; Linda McCall; W Fraser Symmans; Huong T Le-Petross; Bruce G Haffty; Thomas A Buchholz; Heidi Nelson; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  154 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Established Concepts and Emerging Strategies.

Authors:  Tessa G Steenbruggen; Mette S van Ramshorst; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Carolien H Smorenburg; Gabe S Sonke
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Clinicopathological predictors of long-term benefit in breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marco Galvez; Carlos A Castaneda; Joselyn Sanchez; Miluska Castillo; Lia Pamela Rebaza; Gabriela Calderon; Miguel De La Cruz; Jose Manuel Cotrina; Julio Abugattas; Jorge Dunstan; Henry Guerra; Omar Mejia; Henry L Gomez
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-10

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer-background for the indication of locoregional treatment.

Authors:  David Krug; René Baumann; Wilfried Budach; Jürgen Dunst; Petra Feyer; Rainer Fietkau; Wulf Haase; Wolfgang Harms; Thomas Hehr; Marc D Piroth; Felix Sedlmayer; Rainer Souchon; Frederik Wenz; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Neoadjuvant Talazoparib for Patients With Operable Breast Cancer With a Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variant.

Authors:  Jennifer K Litton; Marion E Scoggins; Kenneth R Hess; Beatriz E Adrada; Rashmi K Murthy; Senthil Damodaran; Sarah M DeSnyder; Abenaa M Brewster; Carlos H Barcenas; Vicente Valero; Gary J Whitman; Jill Schwartz-Gomez; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Alastair M Thompson; Thorunn Helgason; Nuhad Ibrahim; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Stacy L Moulder; Banu K Arun
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Insights into Molecular Classifications of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Improving Patient Selection for Treatment.

Authors:  Ana C Garrido-Castro; Nancy U Lin; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 39.397

6.  Magee Equations™ and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2-negative breast cancer: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Rohit Bhargava; Nicole N Esposito; Siobhan M OʹConnor; Zaibo Li; Bradley M Turner; Ioana Moisini; Aditi Ranade; Ronald P Harris; Dylan V Miller; Xiaoxian Li; Harrison Moosavi; Beth Z Clark; Adam M Brufsky; David J Dabbs
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Can we avoid axillary lymph node dissection in N2 breast cancer patients with chemo-sensitive tumours such as HER2 and TNBC?

Authors:  Amparo Garcia-Tejedor; Sergi Fernandez-Gonzalez; Raul Ortega; Miguel Gil-Gil; Hector Perez-Montero; Eulalia Fernandez-Montolí; Agostina Stradella; Sabela Recalde; Teresa Soler; Anna Petit; Maria Teresa Bajen; Ana Benitez; Anna Guma; Miriam Campos; Maria J Pla; Evelyn Martinez; Maria Laplana; Sonia Pernas; Diana Perez-Sildekova; Isabel Catala; Jordi Ponce; Catalina Falo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Pathological Response and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Carboplatin plus Docetaxel.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma; Sara López-Tarruella; José Angel García-Saenz; Qamar J Khan; Henry L Gómez; Aleix Prat; Fernando Moreno; Yolanda Jerez-Gilarranz; Agustí Barnadas; Antoni C Picornell; María Del Monte-Millán; Milagros González-Rivera; Tatiana Massarrah; Beatriz Pelaez-Lorenzo; María Isabel Palomero; Ricardo González Del Val; Javier Cortés; Hugo Fuentes-Rivera; Denisse Bretel Morales; Iván Márquez-Rodas; Charles M Perou; Carolyn Lehn; Yen Y Wang; Jennifer R Klemp; Joshua V Mammen; Jamie L Wagner; Amanda L Amin; Anne P O'Dea; Jaimie Heldstab; Roy A Jensen; Bruce F Kimler; Andrew K Godwin; Miguel Martín
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Pathological assessment of resection specimens after neoadjuvant therapy for metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  M T Tetzlaff; J L Messina; J E Stein; X Xu; R N Amaria; C U Blank; B A van de Wiel; P M Ferguson; R V Rawson; M I Ross; A J Spillane; J E Gershenwald; R P M Saw; A C J van Akkooi; W J van Houdt; T C Mitchell; A M Menzies; G V Long; J A Wargo; M A Davies; V G Prieto; J M Taube; R A Scolyer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Stress-inducible gene Atf3 in the noncancer host cells contributes to chemotherapy-exacerbated breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Yi Seok Chang; Swati P Jalgaonkar; Justin D Middleton; Tsonwin Hai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.