Literature DB >> 17785706

Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

W Fraser Symmans1, Florentia Peintinger, Christos Hatzis, Radhika Rajan, Henry Kuerer, Vicente Valero, Lina Assad, Anna Poniecka, Bryan Hennessy, Marjorie Green, Aman U Buzdar, S Eva Singletary, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Lajos Pusztai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in order to improve the prognostic information that can be obtained from evaluating pathologic response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pathologic slides and reports were reviewed from 382 patients in two different treatment cohorts: sequential paclitaxel (T) then fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) in 241 patients; and a single regimen of FAC in 141 patients. Residual cancer burden (RCB) was calculated as a continuous index combining pathologic measurements of primary tumor (size and cellularity) and nodal metastases (number and size) for prediction of distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in multivariate Cox regression analyses.
RESULTS: RCB was independently prognostic in a multivariate model that included age, pretreatment clinical stage, hormone receptor status, hormone therapy, and pathologic response (pathologic complete response [pCR] v residual disease [RD]; hazard ratio = 2.50; 95% CI 1.70 to 3.69; P < .001). Minimal RD (RCB-I) in 17% of patients carried the same prognosis as pCR (RCB-0). Extensive RD (RCB-III) in 13% of patients was associated with poor prognosis, regardless of hormone receptor status, adjuvant hormone therapy, or pathologic American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of residual disease. The generalizability of RCB for prognosis of distant relapse was confirmed in the FAC-treated validation cohort.
CONCLUSION: RCB determined from routine pathologic materials represented the distribution of RD, was a significant predictor of DRFS, and can be used to define categories of near-complete response and chemotherapy resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17785706     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  438 in total

1.  Early monitoring of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT: defining a clinical aim.

Authors:  David Groheux; Sylvie Giacchetti; Marc Espié; Domenico Rubello; Jean-luc Moretti; Elif Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Breast cancer spatial heterogeneity in near-infrared spectra and the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Ylenia Santoro; Anaïs Leproux; Albert Cerussi; Bruce Tromberg; Enrico Gratton
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Targeted androgen pathway suppression in localized prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elahe A Mostaghel; Peter S Nelson; Paul Lange; Daniel W Lin; Mary Ellen Taplin; Steven Balk; William Ellis; Philip Kantoff; Brett Marck; Daniel Tamae; Alvin M Matsumoto; Lawrence D True; Robert Vessella; Trevor Penning; Rachel Hunter Merrill; Roman Gulati; Bruce Montgomery
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  [Therapy monitoring of neoadjuvant therapy with MRI. RECIST and functional imaging].

Authors:  S Grandl; M Ingrisch; K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Population and target considerations for triple-negative breast cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Terry Hyslop; Yvonne Michael; Tiffany Avery; Hallgeir Rui
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.851

6.  Impact of the first tumor response at eight weeks on overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first-line combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chikako Suzuki; Lennart Blomqvist; Thomas Hatschek; Lena Carlsson; Zakaria Einbeigi; Barbro Linderholm; Birgitta Lindh; Niklas Loman; Martin Malmberg; Samuel Rotstein; Martin Söderberg; Marie Sundqvist; Thomas M Walz; Gunnar Aström; Hirofumi Fujii; Hans Jacobsson; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Comparison of strain and shear-wave ultrasounic elastography in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Shuo Zhang; Jing Li; Jianyi Li; Ye Kang; Weidong Ren
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Phase II Randomized Study of Ixabepilone Versus Observation in Patients With Significant Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Xiudong Lei; Richardo H Alvarez; Majorie C Green; James L Murray; Vicente Valero; Kimberly B Koenig; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Jennifer K Litton; Lakshmy Nair; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Quantitative evaluation of redox ratio and collagen characteristics during breast cancer chemotherapy using two-photon intrinsic imaging.

Authors:  Shulian Wu; Yudian Huang; Qinggong Tang; Zhifang Li; Hannah Horng; Jiatian Li; Zaihua Wu; Yu Chen; Hui Li
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Inhibition of CDK-mediated phosphorylation of Smad3 results in decreased oncogenesis in triple negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tarasewicz; Lisbi Rivas; Randala Hamdan; Danijela Dokic; Vamsi Parimi; Beatriz Penalver Bernabe; Alexandra Thomas; Lonnie D Shea; Jacqueline S Jeruss
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.