Literature DB >> 23812670

Ki67 measured after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

Gunter von Minckwitz1, Wolfgang D Schmitt, Sibylle Loibl, Berit M Müller, Jens U Blohmer, Bruno V Sinn, Holger Eidtmann, Wolfgang Eiermann, Bernd Gerber, Hans Tesch, Jörn Hilfrich, Jens Huober, Tanja Fehm, Jana Barinoff, Thomas Rüdiger, Erhard Erbstoesser, Peter A Fasching, Thomas Karn, Volkmar Müller, Christian Jackisch, Carsten Denkert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The value of Ki67 measured on residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not sufficiently described. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Participants of the GeparTrio study with primary breast cancer randomly received neoadjuvant response-guided [8 cycles TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) in responding and TAC-NX (vinorelbine/capecitabine) in nonresponding patients] or conventional (6 cycles TAC) chemotherapy according to interim response assessment. Ki-67 levels were centrally measured immunohistochemically after neoadjuvant treatment if tumor tissue was available. Here, we analyze 1,151 patients having a pathologic complete response (pCR; n, 484), or residual disease with low (0-15%), intermediate (15.1-35%), or high (35.1-100%) posttreatment Ki67 levels in 488, 77, and 102 patients, respectively.
RESULTS: Patients with high posttreatment Ki67 levels showed higher risk for disease relapse (P < 0.0001) and death (P < 0.0001) compared with patients with low or intermediate Ki67 levels. Patients with low Ki67 levels showed a comparable outcome to patients with a pCR (P = 0.211 for disease-free and P = 0.779 for overall survival). Posttreatment Ki67 levels provided more prognostic information than pretreatment Ki67 levels or changes of Ki67 from pre- to posttreatment. Information on pCR plus posttreatment Ki67 levels surmount the prognostic information of pCR alone in hormone-receptor-positive disease [hazard ratios (HR), 1.82-5.88] but not in hormone-receptor-negative disease (HR: 0.61-1.73). Patients with conventional and response-guided treatment did not show a different distribution of posttreatment Ki67 (P = 0.965).
CONCLUSIONS: Posttreatment Ki67 levels provide prognostic information for patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Levels were not prognostic for outcome after response-guided chemotherapy. High posttreatment Ki67 indicates the need for innovative postneoadjuvant treatments. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23812670     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  50 in total

1.  Usefulness of positron emission mammography in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Irma Soldevilla-Gallardo; Sevastian S Medina-Ornelas; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Enrique Bargalló-Rocha; Claudia Hs Caro-Sánchez; Rodrigo Hernández-Ramírez; Enrique Estrada-Lobato
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 2.  Landscape of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tufia C Haddad; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline.

Authors:  S Gandhi; G G Fletcher; A Eisen; M Mates; O C Freedman; S F Dent; M E Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Pragmatic issues in biomarker evaluation for targeted therapies in cancer.

Authors:  Armand de Gramont; Sarah Watson; Lee M Ellis; Jordi Rodón; Josep Tabernero; Aimery de Gramont; Stanley R Hamilton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Quality assurance trials for Ki67 assessment in pathology.

Authors:  M Raap; S Ließem; J Rüschoff; A Fisseler-Eckhoff; A Reiner; S Dirnhofer; R von Wasielewski; H Kreipe
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer - Advances and Limitations.

Authors:  Peter A Fasching; Paul Gaß; Alexander Hein
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Molecular profiling of the residual disease of triple-negative breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy identifies actionable therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Justin M Balko; Jennifer M Giltnane; Kai Wang; Luis J Schwarz; Christian D Young; Rebecca S Cook; Phillip Owens; Melinda E Sanders; Maria G Kuba; Violeta Sánchez; Richard Kurupi; Preston D Moore; Joseph A Pinto; Franco D Doimi; Henry Gómez; Dai Horiuchi; Andrei Goga; Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Jeffrey S Ross; Gary A Palmer; Roman Yelensky; Maureen Cronin; Vincent A Miller; Phillip J Stephens; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Concerning Dediu M, Zielinski A: A Proposal to Redefine Pathologic Complete Remission as Endpoint following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer. Breast Care 2019; Doi 10.1159/000500620.

Authors:  Michael Untch; Sibylle Loibl; Peter A Fasching
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Strong cytoplasmic expression of NF-κB/p65 correlates with a good prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Motoi Baba; Masato Takahashi; Katsushige Yamashiro; Hideki Yokoo; Moto Fukai; Masanori Sato; Mitsuchika Hosoda; Toshiya Kamiyama; Akinobu Taketomi; Hiroko Yamashita
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Impact of biomarker changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical response in patients with residual breast cancers.

Authors:  Yukie Enomoto; Takashi Morimoto; Arisa Nishimukai; Tomoko Higuchi; Ayako Yanai; Yoshimasa Miyagawa; Keiko Murase; Michiko Imamura; Yuichi Takatsuka; Takashi Nomura; Masashi Takeda; Takahiro Watanabe; Seiichi Hirota; Yasuo Miyoshi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.