Literature DB >> 29869013

Reconstructed the bone stock after femoral bone loss in Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures using cortical strut allograft and impacted cancellous allograft.

Donghai Li1, Qinsheng Hu1, Pengde Kang2, Jing Yang1, Zongke Zhou1, Bin Shen1, Fuxing Pei1.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of reconstructing bone stock in Vancouver B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) using an impacted cancellous allograft cortical or combined with cortical strut allograft. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 39 Vancouver-type B3 periprosthetic fractures in 39 patients. Having different bone defects in the femur, 20 patients were treated with intramedullary impacted cancellous allograft, and 19 patients were treated with impacted cancellous allograft combined with cortical strut allograft. The median follow-up time was 58 months.
RESULTS: Thirty-three patients completed the follow-up as scheduled, and three of them underwent re-operation (9.1%, 3/33). The last evaluated mean hip Harris score was 81.8; WOMAC pain, stiffness, and function scores were 82.3, 79.0, and 81.3, respectively. The satisfaction score was 86.6, and the SF-12 mental and physical scores were 40.4 and 51.1, respectively, for all patients. These outcomes were without significant difference between the two treatment groups (p > 0.05). The facture union was achieved in all the hips (100%). The stem was fixed with bone ingrowth in 24 patients and with fibrous fixation in eight, while stem fixation was not achieved for the remaining patient. The stem subsided less than 3 mm in 23 patients and 3-5 mm in nine patients. One patient had > 5 mm subsidence. The femoral bone stock was improved in 18 patients and remained unchanged in 14 patients; only one patient suffered a diminished bone stock. The radiographic assessment outcomes exhibited little difference between the two treatment groups (p > 0.05). Osseous union of the cortical strut to the host femur occurred in six patients with partial union and ten with complete union. There was moderate and mild graft resorption in three and 13 hips, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of impacted cancellous allograft and cortical strut allograft to reconstruct bone stock can provide reliable options and satisfactory results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone loss; Periprosthetic femoral fractures; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29869013     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3997-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  31 in total

1.  Patient factors predict periprosthetic fractures after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Matthew R Jensen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Revision arthroplasty using allograft bone.

Authors:  A E Gross; G Allen; G Lavoie
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1993

3.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures--stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures.

Authors:  George Pavlou; Pavlos Panteliadis; David Macdonald; John A Timperley; Graham Gie; Gordon Bancroft; Eleftherios Tsiridis
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Femoral revision surgery with impaction bone grafting: 31 hips followed prospectively for ten to 15 years.

Authors:  B L E F Ten Have; R W Brouwer; R W Brouwer Md; F C van Biezen; J A N Verhaar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-05

6.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Proximal femoral allograft treatment of Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anthony C Maury; Ari Pressman; Barry Cayen; Paul Zalzal; David Backstein; Allan Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Combined use of extensively porous coated femoral components with onlay cortical strut allografts in revision of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Hao-bo Wu; Shi-gui Yan; Li-dong Wu; Rong-xin He; Xiang-hua Wang; Xue-song Dai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Daniel J Berry; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis.

Authors:  R E Cook; P J Jenkins; P J Walmsley; J T Patton; C M Robinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  A new classification for proximal femur bone defects in conservative hip arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Filippo Casella; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Matteo Papalia; Francesco Falez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A new classification for proximal femur bone defects in conservative hip arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Filippo Casella; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Matteo Papalia; Francesco Falez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Incidence and pattern of periprosthetic hip fractures around the stem in different stem geometry.

Authors:  Umberto Cottino; Federico Dettoni; Giorgia Caputo; Davide E Bonasia; Paolo Rossi; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Induced membrane technique for the treatment of severe acute tibial bone loss: preliminary experience at medium-term follow-up.

Authors:  Mario Ronga; Mario Cherubino; Katia Corona; Alessandro Fagetti; Barbara Bertani; Luigi Valdatta; Redento Mora; Paolo Cherubino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Load Sharing in the Femur Using Strut Allografts: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Frances E Sharpe; Kipling P Sharpe; Colin P McCarty; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-04-12

6.  Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Reducing Perioperative Blood Loss During Revision Surgery for Vancouver Type B Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Qiu-Ru Wang; Releken Yeersheng; Dong-Hai Li; Zhou-Yuan Yang; Peng-de Kang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Hui Lv; Xing Guo; Yuan Hui Wang; Zhong Jie Zhang; Long Fei Zou; Hao Xue; Deng Hua Huang; Mei Yun Tan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Schopper; Matthias Luger; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.