Kari White1, Stephanie B Teal, Joseph E Potter. 1. Department of Health Care Organization & Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; and the Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate women's patterns of contraceptive use after delivery and the association between method use and risk of pregnancy within 18 months. METHODS: We used the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth to examine women's contraceptive use after delivery and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after giving birth. The sample included 3,005 births that occurred within 3 years of the survey date and for which information on contraceptive use was available. We estimated multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models to assess the association between women's method use and risk of pregnancy within 18 months after delivery. We also examined the percentage of pregnancies occurring 18 months or less after the index birth that were unintended. RESULTS: Between delivery and 3 months postpartum, contraceptive use increased from 21% to 72%. At 3 months, 13% of women used permanent contraception, 6% used long-acting reversible contraceptives, 28% used other hormonal methods, and 25% relied on less-effective methods; the distribution of method use was similar in subsequent months. Among women using hormonal methods, 12.6% became pregnant within 18 months of delivery or less compared with 0.5% using permanent and long-acting contraception (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 21.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.17-72.8). Additionally, 17.8% of women using less-effective methods (HR 34.8, 95% CI 9.26-131) and 23% using no method (HR 43.2, 95% CI 12.3-152) became pregnant 18 months or less. At least 70% of pregnancies within 1 year after delivery were unintended. CONCLUSION: Few women use long-acting reversible contraceptives after delivery, and those using less-effective methods have an increased risk of unintended pregnancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate women's patterns of contraceptive use after delivery and the association between method use and risk of pregnancy within 18 months. METHODS: We used the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth to examine women's contraceptive use after delivery and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after giving birth. The sample included 3,005 births that occurred within 3 years of the survey date and for which information on contraceptive use was available. We estimated multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models to assess the association between women's method use and risk of pregnancy within 18 months after delivery. We also examined the percentage of pregnancies occurring 18 months or less after the index birth that were unintended. RESULTS: Between delivery and 3 months postpartum, contraceptive use increased from 21% to 72%. At 3 months, 13% of women used permanent contraception, 6% used long-acting reversible contraceptives, 28% used other hormonal methods, and 25% relied on less-effective methods; the distribution of method use was similar in subsequent months. Among women using hormonal methods, 12.6% became pregnant within 18 months of delivery or less compared with 0.5% using permanent and long-acting contraception (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 21.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.17-72.8). Additionally, 17.8% of women using less-effective methods (HR 34.8, 95% CI 9.26-131) and 23% using no method (HR 43.2, 95% CI 12.3-152) became pregnant 18 months or less. At least 70% of pregnancies within 1 year after delivery were unintended. CONCLUSION: Few women use long-acting reversible contraceptives after delivery, and those using less-effective methods have an increased risk of unintended pregnancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: Kate Coleman-Minahan; Chloe H Dillaway; Caitlin Canfield; Daniela M Kuhn; Katherine S Strandberg; Joseph E Potter Journal: Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2018-12-03
Authors: Titilope Oduyebo; Lauren B Zapata; Maegan E Boutot; Naomi K Tepper; Kathryn M Curtis; Denise V D'Angelo; Polly A Marchbanks; Maura K Whiteman Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Mary Montague; Mustafa Ascha; Barbara Wilkinson; Emily Verbus; Jane Morris; Brian M Mercer; Kavita Shah Arora Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Abigail Liberty; Kimberly Yee; Blair G Darney; Ana Lopez-Defede; Maria I Rodriguez Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-12-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Joseph E Potter; Kate Coleman-Minahan; Kari White; Daniel A Powers; Chloe Dillaway; Amanda J Stevenson; Kristine Hopkins; Daniel Grossman Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Elizabeth E Krans; Joo Yeon Kim; Alton Everette James; David K Kelley; Marian Jarlenski Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 4.492