Literature DB >> 28486357

Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.

Michelle H Moniz1, Tammy Chang, Michele Heisler, Lindsay Admon, Acham Gebremariam, Vanessa K Dalton, Matthew M Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure rates of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants, and tubal sterilization during delivery hospitalizations and correlates of their use.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the 2008-2013 National Inpatient Sample, a publicly available all-payer database. We identified delivery hospitalizations with the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes for intrauterine device insertion, contraceptive implant insertion, and tubal sterilization. We used weighted multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between predictors (age, delivery mode, medical comorbidity, payer, hospital type, geographic region, and year) and likelihood of LARC and sterilization and to compare characteristics of LARC and sterilization users.
RESULTS: Our sample included 4,691,683 discharges, representing 22,667,204 delivery hospitalizations. Long-acting reversible contraception insertion increased from 1.86 per 10,000 deliveries (2008-2009) to 13.5 per 10,000 deliveries (2012-2013; P<.001); tubal sterilization remained stable (711-683 per 10,000 deliveries; P=.24). In multivariable analysis adjusting for all predictors, compared with neither LARC nor sterilization, LARC use was highest among women with medical comorbidities (count per 10,000 deliveries: 15.04, standard error 2.11, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72-2.13), nonprivate payer (13.50, standard error 2.14, adjusted OR 5.23, 95% CI 3.82-7.16), and at urban teaching hospitals (14.92, standard error 2.25, adjusted OR 20.85, 95% CI 12.73-34.15). Sterilization was least likely among women aged 24 years or younger (251.04, standard error 4.88, adjusted OR 0.12 95% CI 0.12-0.13, compared with 35 years or older) and most likely with cesarean delivery (1,568.74, standard error 20.81, adjusted OR 6.25, 95% CI 5.88-6.63). Comparing only LARC and sterilization users, LARC users tended to have nonprivate insurance (84.95% compared with 57.17%, adjusted OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.38-2.63) and deliver at urban teaching hospitals (94.65% compared with 45.47%, adjusted OR 38.39, 23.52-62.64) in later study years (2012-2013; 55.72% compared with 32.18%, adjusted OR 8.26, 95% CI 4.42-15.44, compared with 2008-2009).
CONCLUSION: Long-acting reversible contraception insertion increased from 1.86 to 13.5 per 10,000 deliveries but remained less than 2% of the sterilization rate. Inpatient postpartum LARC insertion is more likely among sicker, poorer women delivering at urban teaching hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28486357      PMCID: PMC5508209          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  24 in total

1.  Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Anyeli Rosas-Bermúdez; Ana Cecilia Kafury-Goeta
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A qualitative study of barriers to postpartum sterilization and women's attitudes toward unfulfilled sterilization requests.

Authors:  Melissa Gilliam; Shawna D Davis; Amy Berlin; Nikki B Zite
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Implementing Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Programs.

Authors:  Lisa G Hofler; Sarah Cordes; Carrie A Cwiak; Peggy Goedken; Denise J Jamieson; Melissa Kottke
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Medicaid Administrator Experiences with the Implementation of Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Tammy Chang; Matthew M Davis; Jane Forman; Jessica Landgraf; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2016-02-28

5.  Interpregnancy intervals: impact of postpartum contraceptive effectiveness and coverage.

Authors:  Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Richard Chang; Mike Howell; Philip Darney
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Eleanor B Schwarz; Matthew F Reeves; James E Bost; Mitchell D Creinin; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests.

Authors:  Andrea Ries Thurman; Torri Janecek
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United States, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Stephen W Patrick; Robert E Schumacher; Brian D Benneyworth; Elizabeth E Krans; Jennifer M McAllister; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: the time is now.

Authors:  Michelle Moniz; Tammy Chang; Michele Heisler; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Reconsidering racial/ethnic differences in sterilization in the United States.

Authors:  Kari White; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  14 in total

1.  Medicaid and receipt of interval postpartum long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Barbara Wilkinson; Mustafa Ascha; Emily Verbus; Mary Montague; Jane Morris; Brian Mercer; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Medicaid and fulfillment of desired postpartum sterilization.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Barbara Wilkinson; Emily Verbus; Mary Montague; Jane Morris; Mustafa Ascha; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-02-25       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Attitudes and beliefs of obstetricians-gynecologists regarding Medicaid postpartum sterilization - A qualitative study.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Roselle Ponsaran; Laura Morello; Leila Katabi; Rosemary T Behmer Hansen; Nikki Zite; Kari White
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Care That Promotes Reproductive Justice.

Authors:  Michelle H Moniz; Kayte Spector-Bagdady; Michele Heisler; Lisa Hope Harris
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kristiana Lehn; Linda Gu; Mitchell D Creinin; Melissa J Chen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Patient perceptions of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Katharine Sznajder; Diana N Carvajal; Carolyn Sufrin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Analysis of Postpartum Uptake of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Before and After Implementation of Medicaid Reimbursement Policy.

Authors:  Madeline Smith; Megan McCool-Myers; Melissa J Kottke
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-06-09

8.  Changes in Rates of Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the USA, 2012-2016.

Authors:  David Sheyn; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-05-10

9.  Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Practices in Postpartum Sterilization Without a Valid Medicaid Consent Form.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Roselle Ponsaran; Laura Morello; Leila Katabi; Rosemary T Behmer Hansen; Nikki Zite; Kari White
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  Champions in context: which attributes matter for change efforts in healthcare?

Authors:  Kirsten Bonawitz; Marisa Wetmore; Michele Heisler; Vanessa K Dalton; Laura J Damschroder; Jane Forman; Katie R Allan; Michelle H Moniz
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.