Literature DB >> 28662935

Prevalence and Predictors of Prenatal and Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling in Two Texas Cities.

Kate Coleman-Minahan1, Abigail R A Aiken2, Joseph E Potter3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the prevalence of and sociodemographic associations with receiving prenatal and postpartum contraceptive counseling, including counseling on intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants.
METHODS: We used data from a prospective cohort study of 803 postpartum women in El Paso and Austin, Texas. We examined the prevalence of prenatal and postpartum counseling, provider discouragement of IUDs and implants, and associated sociodemographic characteristics using χ2 tests and logistic regression.
RESULTS: One-half of participants had received any prenatal contraceptive counseling, and 13% and 37% received counseling on both IUDs and implants prenatally and postpartum, respectively. Women with more children were more likely to receive any contraceptive counseling prenatally (odds ratio [OR], 1.99; p < .01). Privately insured women (OR, 0.53; p < .05) had a lower odds of receiving prenatal counseling on IUDs and implants than publicly insured women. Higher education (OR, 2.16; p < .05) and attending a private practice (OR, 2.16; p < .05) were associated with receiving any postpartum counseling. Older age (OR, 0.61; p < .05) was negatively associated with receiving postpartum counseling about IUDs and implants and a family income of $10,000 to $19,000 (OR, 2.21; p < .01) was positively associated. Approximately 20% of women receiving prenatal counseling and 10% receiving postpartum counseling on IUDs and implants were discouraged from using them. The most common reason providers restricted use of these methods was inaccurate medical advice.
CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal and postpartum counseling, particularly about IUDs and implants, was infrequent and varied by sociodemographics. Providers should implement evidence-based prenatal and postpartum contraceptive counseling to ensure women can make informed choices and access their preferred method of postpartum contraception.
Copyright © 2017 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28662935      PMCID: PMC5694359          DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  32 in total

1.  Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women.

Authors:  Joseph A Tony Ogburn; Eve Espey; Jody Stonehocker
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Onsite provision of specialized contraceptive services: does Title X funding enhance access?

Authors:  Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Julie Cross Riedel; Mary Menz; Philip D Darney; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Mia R Zolna
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Is effective contraceptive use conceived prenatally in Florida? The association between prenatal contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use.

Authors:  Leticia E Hernandez; William M Sappenfield; David Goodman; Jennifer Pooler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

5.  Cutting family planning in Texas.

Authors:  Kari White; Daniel Grossman; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Who gives advice about postpartum contraception?

Authors:  A F Glasier; J Logan; T J McGlew
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Corinne H Rocca; Kirsten M Thompson; Johanna Morfesis; Suzan Goodman; Philip D Darney; Carolyn L Westhoff; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Committee Opinion No. 670: Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The impact of reproductive health legislation on family planning clinic services in Texas.

Authors:  Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Abigail R A Aiken; Amanda Stevenson; Celia Hubert; Daniel Grossman; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 11.561

10.  Barriers to Postpartum Contraception in Texas and Pregnancy Within 2 Years of Delivery.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Celia Hubert; Amanda Jean Stevenson; Kristine Hopkins; Abigail R A Aiken; Kari White; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.623

View more
  3 in total

1.  Low-Income Texas Women's Experiences Accessing Their Desired Contraceptive Method at the First Postpartum Visit.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Chloe H Dillaway; Caitlin Canfield; Daniela M Kuhn; Katherine S Strandberg; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2018-12-03

2.  Quality of postpartum contraceptive counseling and changes in contraceptive method preferences.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Contraceptive Use and Its Associated Factors among Women Who Gave Birth within 12 Months in Dubti Town, Pastoral Community, of Afar Region Northeast, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abdu Yimam; Girmatsion Fisseha; Mebrahtu Kalayu; Etsay Woldu Anbesu
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2021-07-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.