Literature DB >> 25999683

Is SPECT or CT Based Attenuation Correction More Quantitatively Accurate for Dedicated Breast SPECT Acquired with Non-Traditional Trajectories?

Kristy L Perez1, Steve D Mann1, Jan H Pachon2, Priti Madhav3, Martin P Tornai2.   

Abstract

Attenuation correction is necessary for SPECT quantification. There are a variety of methods to create attenuation maps. For dedicated breast SPECT imaging, it is unclear if either SPECT- or CT-based attenuation map would provide the most accurate quantification and whether or not segmenting the different tissue types will have an effect on the qunatification. For these experiments, 99mTc diluted in methanol and water was filled into geometric and anthropomorphic breast phantoms and was imaged with a dedicated dual-modality SPECT-CT scanner. SPECT images were collected using a compact CZT camera with various 3D acquisitions including vertical and 30° tilted parallel beam, and complex sinusoidal trajectories. CT images were acquired using a quasi-monochromatic x-ray source and CsI(T1) flat panel digital detector in a half-cone beam geometry. Measured scatter correction for SPECT and CT were implemented. To compare photon attenuation correction in the reconstructed SPECT images, various volumetric attenuation matrices were derived from 1) uniform SPECT, 2) uniform CT, and 3) segmented CT, populated with different attenuation coefficient values. Comparisons between attenuation masks using phantoms consisting of materials with different attenuation values show that at 140 keV the differences in the attenuation between materials do not affect the quantification as much as the size and alignment of the attenuation map. The CT-based attenuation maps give quantitative values 30% below the actual value, but are consistent. While the SPECT-based attenuation maps can provide within 10% accurate quantitative values, but are less consistent.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 25999683      PMCID: PMC4437574          DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2010.5874198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)        ISSN: 1095-7863


  5 in total

1.  Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT images with X-ray CT: effects of registration errors between X-ray CT and SPECT.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Takahashi; Kenya Murase; Hiroshi Higashino; Teruhito Mochizuki; Nobutoku Motomura
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT: effects of misregistration and value of reregistration.

Authors:  Sibyll Goetze; Tracy L Brown; William C Lavely; Zhe Zhang; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Evaluation of fully 3-D emission mammotomography with a compact cadmium zinc telluride detector.

Authors:  Caryl N Brzymialkiewicz; Martin P Tornai; Randolph L McKinley; James E Bowsher
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Quantitative SPECT imaging: a review and recommendations by the Focus Committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine Computer and Instrumentation Council.

Authors:  M S Rosenthal; J Cullom; W Hawkins; S C Moore; B M Tsui; M Yester
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Effect of registration errors between transmission and emission scans on a SPECT system using sequential scanning.

Authors:  C D Stone; J W McCormick; D R Gilland; K L Greer; R E Coleman; R J Jaszczak
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.057

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.