Literature DB >> 7806471

Differential effects of visual attention on spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.

C Meric1, L Collet.   

Abstract

A visual task decreases evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) to an interindividually variable degree. The aim of these two studies was to assess whether the presence or absence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) is involved in this variability. The first experiment investigated spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE) frequency shifts during a visual attention task with a Fast Fourier Transform analysis, and found no attention effect on SOAEs. Using a larger subject pool, the second experiment concerned the attention effect on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and SOAE amplitude, using different measurement methods with the same visual task. The sample was composed of two groups of subjects: group A comprising subjects presenting SOAEs and group B subjects without SOAEs. A decrease in EOAE amplitude for group B during attention was observed and seems to confirm a possible influence of attention on the cochlea via the medial olivocochlear efferent system (MOES). The TEOAE amplitude of group A did not vary during attention, showing the peculiarity of this population of subjects and suggesting a different cochlear functioning.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7806471     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(94)90070-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  10 in total

1.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Synchronized Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Provide a Signal-to-Noise Ratio Advantage in Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Assays.

Authors:  James D Lewis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-13

3.  Effects of cross-modal selective attention on the sensory periphery: cochlear sensitivity is altered by selective attention.

Authors:  S Srinivasan; A Keil; K Stratis; K L Woodruff Carr; D W Smith
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Frequency tuning of medial-olivocochlear-efferent acoustic reflexes in humans as functions of probe frequency.

Authors:  Watjana Lilaonitkul; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. I: auditory attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. II: visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Interaural attention modulates outer hair cell function.

Authors:  Sridhar Srinivasan; Andreas Keil; Kyle Stratis; Aaron F Osborne; Colin Cerwonka; Jennifer Wong; Brenda L Rieger; Valerie Polcz; David W Smith
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Cognitive task demands modulate the sensitivity of the human cochlea.

Authors:  David W Smith; Rony K Aouad; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-13

9.  The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation.

Authors:  David W Smith; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25

10.  Auditory Attention Reduced Ear-Canal Noise in Humans by Reducing Subject Motion, Not by Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Inhibition: Implications for Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions During a Behavioral Task.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; Wei Zhao; John J Guinan
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.