Literature DB >> 7652027

Influence of auditory stimulation and visual attention on otoacoustic emissions.

C Ferber-Viart1, R Duclaux, L Collet, F Guyonnard.   

Abstract

Transient Evoked otoacoustical Emissions (TEOAEs) express the micromechanical activity of the cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs). The inhibitory effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation and of visual attention tasks on TEOAE amplitude is well-established. Contralateral auditory stimulation and attention affect cochlear micromechanics via the medial olivocochlear efferent system. The present study is a quantitative comparison of the individual and combined effects of these two inhibitory phenomena in the same subjects. TEOAEs were recorded in seven normal-hearing subjects in absence of inhibitory stimulus (S1), under contralateral 95 dB SPL white-noise stimulation (S2), during a visual attention task (S3) and with simultaneous presentation of both forms of stimulus (S4). Significant reductions in TEOAE amplitude were found with contralateral stimulation (S2) and visual attention (S3) (p = 0.01 and 0.05 respectively, in confirmation of previous studies. The inhibitory effect of combined stimulation (S4) was found to be yet more significant (p = 0.004) than the inhibition obtained with each stimulation presented alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7652027     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)00012-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  8 in total

1.  Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Examining replicability of an otoacoustic measure of cochlear function during selective attention.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. I: auditory attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. II: visual attention.

Authors:  Kyle P Walsh; Edward G Pasanen; Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effect of eye lateralization on contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D Soi; D Brambilla; E Comiotto; F Di Berardino; E Filipponi; M Socci; E Spreafico; S Forti; A Cesarani
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Heightened visual attention does not affect inner ear function as measured by otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Rafal Milner; Lukasz Olszewski; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Effect of Auditory Predictability on the Human Peripheral Auditory System.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Irina-Andreea Marianu; Federico De Martino
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Auditory Attention Reduced Ear-Canal Noise in Humans by Reducing Subject Motion, Not by Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Inhibition: Implications for Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions During a Behavioral Task.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; Wei Zhao; John J Guinan
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.