Literature DB >> 25991601

Predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy.

G Hatiboglu1, D Teber2, D Tichy3, S Pahernik2, B Hadaschik2, J Nyarangi-Dix2, M Hohenfellner2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1553 patients underwent radical prostatectomy in a single institution (670 RRP, 883 RARP), had complete perioperative data and follow-up for urinary continence and were included in this prospective analysis. Immediate continence was defined as no pad usage after catheter removal. Evaluated parameters included age, body mass index, ECOG performance status, erectile function, prostate volume, PSA, Gleason score, tumor stage and D'Amico risk groups, as well as surgical approach (RRP, RARP), surgeon volume, nerve-sparing, lymphadenectomy, blood transfusions and duration of catheterization.
RESULTS: A total of 240 men (15.5 %) did not require any pads 1 day or later after removal of the transurethral catheter. Correlation of parameters with immediate continence revealed significance for age (p < 0.001), ECOG-score (p = 0.025), erectile function (p = 0.001), nerve-sparing (p = 0.022), Gleason score (p = 0.002) and surgeon volume (p ≤ 0.022). Multivariate analyses identified IIEF-score >21 (p = 0.031), ECOG (p < 0.05), bilateral nerve-sparing (p = 0.049), Gleason score <3 + 4 (p ≤ 0.028), less blood transfusion (p ≤ 0.044) and surgeon volume (p ≤ 0.042) as the remaining prognostic parameters for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy. The type of surgical approach (robotic vs. open radical prostatectomy) did not yield significant influence.
CONCLUSION: Evaluating continence in a contemporary prospective cohort revealed 15.5 % of patients never requiring a pad postoperatively. Predictive parameters for immediate continence were erectile function, ECOG, bilateral nerve-sparing, less blood transfusion and Gleason score. Furthermore, the surgeon's experience but not his operative technique had a significant impact on immediate postoperative continence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immediate continence; Prognostic factors; Prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25991601     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1594-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  27 in total

1.  Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method.

Authors:  Roland F Van Velthoven; Thomas E Ahlering; Alexandre Peltier; Douglas W Skarecky; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Intraoperative nerve stimulation with measurement of urethral sphincter pressure changes during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Caleb P Nelson; James E Montie; Edward J McGuire; Gary Wedemeyer; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence.

Authors:  Harveer S Dev; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Abhishek Srivastava; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Raymond C Rosen; Walter Artibani; Peter R Carroll; Anthony Costello; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul R Patel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Henk Van der Poel; Timothy G Wilson; Filiberto Zattoni; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Age is predictive of immediate postoperative urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Fabio Campodonico; Egi Edward Manuputty; Sara Campora; Matteo Puntoni; Massimo Maffezzini
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Predictors of immediate continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jesse D Sammon; Pranav Sharma; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Khurshid R Ghani; Shyam Sukumar; Mani Menon
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  N Weidner; P R Carroll; J Flax; W Blumenfeld; J Folkman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Comparison of continence recovery between robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Seung Jun Son; Sang Chul Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Seong Jin Jeong; Seok Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-09-10

10.  Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Judd Moul; Peter R Carroll; Leon Sun; Deborah Lubeck; Ming-Hui Chen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

1.  The impact of time to catheter removal on short-, intermediate- and long-term urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Derya Tilki; Felix Preisser; Pierre Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Felix K Chun; Raisa S Pompe
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Perioperative predictors for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence in prostate cancer patients following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Long-term results of a Canadian prospective cohort.

Authors:  Emad Rajih; Malek Meskawi; Abdullah M Alenizi; Kevin C Zorn; Mansour Alnazari; Marc Zanaty; Naif Alhathal; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  The increase of stage, grading, and metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy during the last decade.

Authors:  Vincent Beck; Boris Schlenker; Annika Herlemann; Maria Apfelbeck; Alexander Buchner; Christian Gratzke; Christian G Stief; Stefan Tritschler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) before and after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: does improvement of LUTS mitigate worsened incontinence after robotic prostatectomy?

Authors:  Lukas Dommer; Jan A Birzele; Khosrow Ahmadi; Mario Rampa; Daniel J Stekhoven; Räto T Strebel
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-08

5.  Effect of prostatic apex shape (Lee types) and urethral sphincter length in preoperative MRI on very early continence rates after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mike Wenzel; Felix Preisser; Matthias Mueller; Lena H Theissen; Maria N Welte; Benedikt Hoeh; Clara Humke; Simon Bernatz; Boris Bodelle; Christoph Würnschimmel; Derya Tilki; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Frederik C Roos; Andreas Becker; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Felix K H Chun; Luis A Kluth; Philipp Mandel
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.370

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.