Literature DB >> 12775742

Cancer-specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the prostate-specific antigen era.

Anthony V D'Amico1, Judd Moul, Peter R Carroll, Leon Sun, Deborah Lubeck, Ming-Hui Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether pretreatment risk groups shown to predict time to prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) after treatment at a single institution retained that ability in a multi-institutional setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1988 to 2002, 7,316 patients treated in the United States at 44 institutions with either surgery (n = 4,946) or radiation (n = 2,370) for clinical stage T1c-2, N0 or NX, M0 prostate cancer made up the study cohort. A Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the ability of pretreatment risk groups to predict time to PCSM after treatment. The relative risk (RR) of PCSM and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the intermediate- and high-risk groups relative to the low-risk group.
RESULTS: Estimates of non-PCSM 8 years after prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure were 4% v 15% (surgery versus radiation; Plog rank =.002) compared with 13% v 18% (surgery versus radiation; Plog rank =.35) for patients whose age at the time of PSA failure was less than 70 as compared with >or= 70 years, respectively. The RR of PCSM after treatment for surgery-managed patients with high- or intermediate-risk disease was 14.2 (95% CI, 5.0 to 23.4; PCox <.0001) and 4.9 (95% CI, 1.7 to 8.1; PCox =.0037), respectively. These values were 14.3 (95% CI, 5.2 to 24.0; PCox <.0001) and 5.6 (95% CI, 2.0 to 9.3; PCox =.0012) for radiation-managed patients.
CONCLUSION: This study provided evidence to support the prediction of time to PCSM after surgery or radiation on the basis of pretreatment risk groups for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer managed during the PSA era.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12775742     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  115 in total

1.  Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Oguz Akin; Jonathan A Coleman; Sarah Crane; Mark Emberton; Larry Goldenberg; Hedvig Hricak; Mike W Kattan; John Kurhanewicz; Caroline M Moore; Chris Parker; Thomas J Polascik; Peter Scardino; Nicholas van As; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Radical prostatectomy as primary treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexandre Ingels; Alexandre de la Taille; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Prostate cancer: No evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk disease.

Authors:  Peter Albers
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Phase 2 study of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer: a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium trial.

Authors:  Robert W Ross; Matthew D Galsky; Phil Febbo; Marc Barry; Jerome P Richie; Wanling Xie; Fiona M Fennessy; Rupal S Bhatt; Julia Hayes; Toni K Choueiri; Clare M Tempany; Philip W Kantoff; Mary E Taplin; William K Oh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  An arranged marriage for precision medicine: hypoxia and genomic assays in localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  R G Bristow; A Berlin; A Dal Pra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 8.  [Adjuvant and neoadjuvant drug therapy for prostate cancer].

Authors:  K Miller; M Lein; M Schostak; M Schrader
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  [Status of care for prostate cancer in 2008].

Authors:  B Arndt; M Kwiatkowski; F Recker
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Prostate cancer risk assessment: choosing the sharpest tool in the shed.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.