PURPOSE: To investigate changes in clinical data and pathological features of prostatectomy specimens of prostate cancer (PCa) patients in a large tertiary care center over the last 12 years as potential consequence of reduced acceptance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening and implementation of active surveillance as a therapeutic option in PCa. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients with PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between 2004 and 2016 from our clinical database. We reviewed clinical and pathological data including patient age, PSA level, number of positive cores and Gleason score in prostate biopsy, and pathologic N- and T-stage, and Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen. RESULTS: Data of 5497 consecutive patients were analyzed. Median PSA increased from 7 (IQR 4.8-10.5) to 9 ng/ml (IQR 5.8-16.1; p < 0.001), and median number of positive biopsy cores increased from 3 (IQR 2-5) to 5 (IQR 3-7; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with Gleason score ≥ 7 in biopsy and prostatectomy specimens increased from 40 to 78% and 49 to 89% (p < 0.001), respectively. The rate of locally advanced (≥ pT3a) and lymph node-positive tumors increased from 28 to 43% and 5 to 16% (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a significant change in clinical and pathological findings in our prostatectomy series with a significantly higher proportion of aggressive and locally advanced PCa in recent years. These findings may be related to a reduced acceptance of PSA-based screening and the use of active surveillance as management strategy and have significant impact on daily patient care.
PURPOSE: To investigate changes in clinical data and pathological features of prostatectomy specimens of prostate cancer (PCa) patients in a large tertiary care center over the last 12 years as potential consequence of reduced acceptance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening and implementation of active surveillance as a therapeutic option in PCa. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients with PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between 2004 and 2016 from our clinical database. We reviewed clinical and pathological data including patient age, PSA level, number of positive cores and Gleason score in prostate biopsy, and pathologic N- and T-stage, and Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimen. RESULTS: Data of 5497 consecutive patients were analyzed. Median PSA increased from 7 (IQR 4.8-10.5) to 9 ng/ml (IQR 5.8-16.1; p < 0.001), and median number of positive biopsy cores increased from 3 (IQR 2-5) to 5 (IQR 3-7; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with Gleason score ≥ 7 in biopsy and prostatectomy specimens increased from 40 to 78% and 49 to 89% (p < 0.001), respectively. The rate of locally advanced (≥ pT3a) and lymph node-positive tumors increased from 28 to 43% and 5 to 16% (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a significant change in clinical and pathological findings in our prostatectomy series with a significantly higher proportion of aggressive and locally advanced PCa in recent years. These findings may be related to a reduced acceptance of PSA-based screening and the use of active surveillance as management strategy and have significant impact on daily patient care.
Authors: B Hager; K Kraywinkel; B Keck; A Katalinic; M Meyer; S R Zeissig; R Scheufele; M P Wirth; J Huber Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Annika Herlemann; Alexander Buchner; Alexander Kretschmer; Maria Apfelbeck; Christian G Stief; Christian Gratzke; Stefan Tritschler Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Claudine Isaacs; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Lawrence R Ragard; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Ann W Hsing; Grant Izmirlian; Paul F Pinsky; Barnett S Kramer; Anthony B Miller; John K Gohagan; Philip C Prorok Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Lars Budäus; Jan Spethmann; Hendrik Isbarn; Jan Schmitges; Laura Beesch; Alexander Haese; Georg Salomon; Thorsten Schlomm; Margit Fisch; Hans Heinzer; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Thomas Steuber Journal: BJU Int Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Jean-Pierre Droz; Matti Aapro; Lodovico Balducci; Helen Boyle; Thomas Van den Broeck; Paul Cathcart; Louise Dickinson; Eleni Efstathiou; Mark Emberton; John M Fitzpatrick; Axel Heidenreich; Simon Hughes; Steven Joniau; Michael Kattan; Nicolas Mottet; Stéphane Oudard; Heather Payne; Fred Saad; Toru Sugihara Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Fernand Labrie; Bernard Candas; Lionel Cusan; Jose Luis Gomez; Alain Bélanger; G Brousseau; Eric Chevrette; Jacques Lévesque Journal: Prostate Date: 2004-05-15 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann; Christian Stief; Tak-Hyun Kim; Chukwuka Eze; Simon Kirste; Iosif Strouthos; Minglun Li; Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann; Harun Ilhan; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Peter Bartenstein; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Ute Ganswindt; Claus Belka; Philipp T Meyer; Constantinos Zamboglou Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 10.057