Literature DB >> 23030798

Predictors of immediate continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Jesse D Sammon1, Pranav Sharma, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Khurshid R Ghani, Shyam Sukumar, Mani Menon.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have examined the patient characteristics that lead to early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), and to date, there has been no investigation into the predictors of immediate continence. In the current study, we examine a large multisurgeon population of patients undergoing RARP to assess for predictors of this outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2010, 1270 patients who underwent RARP at our institution, with complete preoperative and follow-up data, were assessed for urinary function prospectively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess for predictors of zero pad usage after RARP. Patient and operative characteristics examined include age, body-mass index, prostate-specific antigen, adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), Gleason sum, international prostate symptom score, clinical stage, nerve sparing, bladder neck reconstruction, posterior anastomotic reconstruction, surgeon volume, and percutaneous suprapubic tube (PST) bladder drainage.
RESULTS: Overall, 17.3% of patients (n=219) never required a pad after catheter removal. Characteristics associated with never requiring a pad are age, preoperative Gleason sum, CCI, nerve sparing, prostate weight, surgeon volume, and PST bladder drainage. Independent predictors of never requiring a pad after catheter removal included nerve-sparing (B/L standard as referent) wide dissection [OR: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.49, 1.88)], unilateral inter-/intrafascial [OR: 1.20 (0.70, 2.06)], bilateral inter-/intrafascial [OR: 1.97 (1.36, 2.86)], and PST drainage [OR: 2.53 (1.56, 4.11)].
CONCLUSION: In a study reflective of broad RARP practice at our institution, 17.3% of patients were entirely pad free after RARP. The type of nerve sparing performed and placement of a PST for bladder drainage postoperatively were found to be independently predictive of never requiring a pad after RARP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23030798     DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  11 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive approach for post-prostatectomy incontinence in the era of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Haga; Ruriko Takinami; Ryo Tanji; Akifumi Onagi; Kanako Matsuoka; Tomoyuki Koguchi; Hidenori Akaihata; Junya Hata; Soichiro Ogawa; Masao Kataoka; Yuichi Sato; Kei Ishibashi; Ken Aikawa; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-26

2.  Predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  G Hatiboglu; D Teber; D Tichy; S Pahernik; B Hadaschik; J Nyarangi-Dix; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Evaluation of Incontinence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Using the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire Short Form and Noting the Number of Safety Pads Needed by Japanese Patients.

Authors:  Katsuya Hikita; Masashi Honda; Bunya Kawamoto; Panagiota Tsounapi; Kuniyasu Muraoka; Takehiro Sejima; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.641

4.  Predictors of early continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin; Alina Camacho Noriega; Roger Valdivieso; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Marc Bienz; Naif Alhathal; Mathieu Latour; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Newer concepts in neural anatomy and neurovascular preservation in robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sailaja Pisipati; Adnan Ali; Rao S Mandalapu; George K Haines Iii; Paras Singhal; Balaji N Reddy; Robert Leung; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10

Review 6.  Suprapubic tube versus urethral catheter drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongyu Jian; Shijian Feng; Yuntian Chen; Xin Wei; Deyi Luo; Hong Li; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Preoperative MRI Parameters Predict Urinary Continence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in Prostatic Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Shinji Fukui; Yoriaki Kagebayashi; Yusuke Iemura; Yoshiaki Matsumura; Shoji Samma
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-25

8.  Factors affecting urinary continence and sexual potency recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mark Fernando Neumaier; Carlos Henrique Segall; Marcelo Hisano; Flávio Eduardo Trigo Rocha; Sami Arap; Marco A Arap
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 9.  Surgical techniques to improve continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmet Urkmez; Weranja Ranasinghe; John W Davis
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

10.  Intravesical prostatic protrusion may affect early postoperative continence undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Katsuya Hikita; Masashi Honda; Shogo Teraoka; Ryoma Nishikawa; Yuske Kimura; Panagiota Tsounapi; Hideto Iwamoto; Shuichi Morizane; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.