Literature DB >> 19780735

Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery.

Raya Al-Suhel1, Simmerjyot Gill, Stephen Robson, Bruce Shadbolt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of Kjelland's forceps is now uncommon, and published maternal and neonatal outcome data are from deliveries conducted more than a decade ago. The role of Kjelland's rotational delivery in the 'modern era' of high caesarean section rates is unclear. AIMS: To compare the results of attempted Kjelland's forceps rotational delivery with other methods of instrumental delivery in a tertiary hospital.
METHODS: Retrospective review of all instrumental deliveries for singleton pregnancies 34 or more weeks gestation in a four-year birth cohort, with reference to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: The outcomes of 1067 attempted instrumental deliveries were analysed. Kjelland's forceps were successful in 95% of attempts. Kjelland's forceps deliveries had a rate of adverse maternal outcomes indistinguishable from non-rotational ventouse, and lower than all other forms of instrumental delivery. Kjelland's forceps also had a lower rate of adverse neonatal outcomes than all other forms of instrumental delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Prudent use of Kjelland's forceps by experienced operators is associated with a very low rate of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Training in this important obstetric skill should be reconsidered urgently, before it is lost forever.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19780735     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01060.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  4 in total

1.  Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.

Authors:  Nivedita Gauthaman; Denise Henry; Irina Chis Ster; Azar Khunda; Stergios K Doumouchtsis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success.

Authors:  Catherine E Aiken; Abigail R Aiken; Jeremy C Brockelsby; James G Scott
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Abigail R Aiken; Catherine E Aiken; Medhat S Alberry; Jeremy C Brockelsby; James G Scott
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Instrumental rotation for persistent fetal occiput posterior position: a way to decrease maternal and neonatal injury?

Authors:  Fabien Vidal; Caroline Simon; Christelle Cristini; Catherine Arnaud; Olivier Parant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.