Literature DB >> 23635740

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland's rotational forceps delivery.

Sarah J Stock1, Katherine Josephs, Sarah Farquharson, Corinne Love, Sarah E Cooper, Chris Kissack, Ranjit Akolekar, Jane E Norman, Fiona C Denison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the rates of early neonatal and maternal complications in a consecutive series of successful Kielland's rotational forceps deliveries.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases of successful rotational forceps deliveries performed in singleton pregnancies at 36 weeks of gestation or more in a tertiary referral center in Scotland, UK, from 2001 to 2008 (n=873). We also compared outcomes associated with successful rotational forceps deliveries in 2008 (n=150) with those of nonrotational forceps delivery (n=873), ventouse delivery (n=159), spontaneous vertex delivery (n=3,494), and emergency cesarean delivery (n=947).
RESULTS: There was one stillbirth associated with a rotational forceps delivery. This was diagnosed before application of forceps. After rotational forceps deliveries, 58 of 872 (6.7%) of live-born neonates were admitted to the neonatal unit. Twenty-seven of 872 (3.1%) neonates had one or more complications that could be attributable to traumatic delivery and seven neonates (0.8%) had a diagnosis of neonatal encephalopathy. When compared with alternative methods of delivery over a single year, neonatal admission rates after delivery by rotational forceps deliveries (5 of 150 [3.3%]) were not significantly different from spontaneous vertex delivery (128 of 3,494 [3.7%; P=1.00]) or ventouse delivery (6 of 159 [3.8%; P=1.00]) and lower than emergency cesarean delivery (106 of 947 [11.2%; P=.002). Postpartum hemorrhage rates after rotational forceps deliveries (8 of 150 [5.3%; P=.008]) were lower than those associated with emergency cesarean delivery (142 of 947 [15.0%; P=.008]).
CONCLUSION: Rates of short-term neonatal and maternal complications after successful rotational forceps deliveries are low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23635740     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828b72cb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.

Authors:  Nivedita Gauthaman; Denise Henry; Irina Chis Ster; Azar Khunda; Stergios K Doumouchtsis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Severe perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery: the impact of occiput posterior position.

Authors:  E Hirsch; R Elue; A Wagner; K Nelson; R K Silver; Y Zhou; M G Adams
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Abigail R Aiken; Catherine E Aiken; Medhat S Alberry; Jeremy C Brockelsby; James G Scott
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Frey's syndrome: A review of the physiology and possible role of neurotrophic factors.

Authors:  Sarah M Hignett; Owen Judd
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-08

5.  Naegele Forceps Delivery and Association between Morbidity and the Number of Forceps Traction Applications: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Naoki Matsumoto; Toshifumi Takenaka; Nobuyuki Ikeda; Satoshi Yazaki; Yuichi Sato
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2015-09-03

6.  Neonatal and maternal outcomes of successful manual rotation to correct malposition of the fetal head; A retrospective and prospective observational study.

Authors:  Nicola Tempest; Naomi McGuinness; Steven Lane; Dharani K Hapangama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Babies in occiput posterior position are significantly more likely to require an emergency cesarean birth compared with babies in occiput transverse position in the second stage of labor: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Nicola Tempest; Steven Lane; Dharani Hapangama
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.636

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.