Literature DB >> 12521771

A matched controlled study of Kielland's forceps for transverse arrest of the fetal vertex.

E Schiff1, S A Friedman, M Zolti, A Avraham, Z Kayam, S Mashiach, H Carp.   

Abstract

This study attempted to determine whether delivery with Kielland's forceps for deep transverse arrest is less favourable than other instruments. One hundred and forty-six women who underwent rotation and delivery with Kielland's forceps between 1994 and 1997 were matched by parity and birth weight to one of two control groups: delivery by non-rotational forceps or the vacuum extractor. No significant differences were found in maternal or neonatal outcome (vaginal lacerations, 3rd- or 4th-degree perineal tears, postpartum haemorrhage, fever, blood transfusion, duration of hospitalisation, Apgar score, asphyxia, scalp trauma, admission to the intensive care unit or neonatal hospitalisation). The incidence of heart rate abnormalities prior to instrumental delivery was similar. The 'failure to deliver' rate (8.9% after Kielland's forceps) was not different to the 7.5% and 6.8% found in each control group. These data indicate that the outcome after Kielland's forceps delivery is similar to other instrumental deliveries if performed by experienced obstetricians.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 12521771     DOI: 10.1080/01443610120085500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  3 in total

1.  Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.

Authors:  Nivedita Gauthaman; Denise Henry; Irina Chis Ster; Azar Khunda; Stergios K Doumouchtsis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success.

Authors:  Catherine E Aiken; Abigail R Aiken; Jeremy C Brockelsby; James G Scott
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Abigail R Aiken; Catherine E Aiken; Medhat S Alberry; Jeremy C Brockelsby; James G Scott
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.661

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.