Literature DB >> 25986934

Protein structure prediction guided by crosslinking restraints--A systematic evaluation of the impact of the crosslinking spacer length.

Tommy Hofmann1, Axel W Fischer2, Jens Meiler3, Stefan Kalkhof4.   

Abstract

Recent development of high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) instruments enables chemical crosslinking (XL) to become a high-throughput method for obtaining structural information about proteins. Restraints derived from XL-MS experiments have been used successfully for structure refinement and protein-protein docking. However, one formidable question is under which circumstances XL-MS data might be sufficient to determine a protein's tertiary structure de novo? Answering this question will not only include understanding the impact of XL-MS data on sampling and scoring within a de novo protein structure prediction algorithm, it must also determine an optimal crosslinker type and length for protein structure determination. While a longer crosslinker will yield more restraints, the value of each restraint for protein structure prediction decreases as the restraint is consistent with a larger conformational space. In this study, the number of crosslinks and their discriminative power was systematically analyzed in silico on a set of 2055 non-redundant protein folds considering Lys-Lys, Lys-Asp, Lys-Glu, Cys-Cys, and Arg-Arg reactive crosslinkers between 1 and 60Å. Depending on the protein size a heuristic was developed that determines the optimal crosslinker length. Next, simulated restraints of variable length were used to de novo predict the tertiary structure of fifteen proteins using the BCL::Fold algorithm. The results demonstrate that a distinct crosslinker length exists for which information content for de novo protein structure prediction is maximized. The sampling accuracy improves on average by 1.0 Å and up to 2.2 Å in the most prominent example. XL-MS restraints enable consistently an improved selection of native-like models with an average enrichment of 2.1.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crosslinking; De novo folding; Mass spectrometry; Protein modeling; Protein structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25986934      PMCID: PMC4803439          DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods        ISSN: 1046-2023            Impact factor:   3.608


  40 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure.

Authors:  Adrian A Canutescu; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Charlie E M Strauss; Carol A Rohl; Dylan Chivian; Phillip Bradley; Lars Malmström; Tim Robertson; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Ingo Ruczinski; Jerry Tsai; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  De novo high-resolution protein structure determination from sparse spin-labeling EPR data.

Authors:  Nathan Alexander; Marco Bortolus; Ahmad Al-Mestarihi; Hassane Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Trends in structural coverage of the protein universe and the impact of the Protein Structure Initiative.

Authors:  Kamil Khafizov; Carlos Madrid-Aliste; Steven C Almo; Andras Fiser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Probing native protein structures by chemical cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatics.

Authors:  Alexander Leitner; Thomas Walzthoeni; Abdullah Kahraman; Franz Herzog; Oliver Rinner; Martin Beck; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Marco Punta; Penny C Coggill; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Chris Boursnell; Ningze Pang; Kristoffer Forslund; Goran Ceric; Jody Clements; Andreas Heger; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  25 in total

1.  XLmap: an R package to visualize and score protein structure models based on sites of protein cross-linking.

Authors:  Devin K Schweppe; Juan D Chavez; James E Bruce
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  A Novel MS-Cleavable Azo Cross-Linker for Peptide Structure Analysis by Free Radical Initiated Peptide Sequencing (FRIPS).

Authors:  Claudio Iacobucci; Christoph Hage; Mathias Schäfer; Andrea Sinz
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 3.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Novel Concepts of MS-Cleavable Cross-linkers for Improved Peptide Structure Analysis.

Authors:  Christoph Hage; Francesco Falvo; Mathias Schäfer; Andrea Sinz
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Dissociation Behavior of a TEMPO-Active Ester Cross-Linker for Peptide Structure Analysis by Free Radical Initiated Peptide Sequencing (FRIPS) in Negative ESI-MS.

Authors:  Christoph Hage; Christian H Ihling; Michael Götze; Mathias Schäfer; Andrea Sinz
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Iterative Molecular Dynamics-Rosetta Membrane Protein Structure Refinement Guided by Cryo-EM Densities.

Authors:  Sumudu P Leelananda; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 7.  Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: An Emerging Technology for Interactomics and Structural Biology.

Authors:  Clinton Yu; Lan Huang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Integrated Structural Biology for α-Helical Membrane Protein Structure Determination.

Authors:  Yan Xia; Axel W Fischer; Pedro Teixeira; Brian Weiner; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Bifunctional cross-linking approaches for mass spectrometry-based investigation of nucleic acids and protein-nucleic acid assemblies.

Authors:  M Scalabrin; S M Dixit; M M Makshood; C E Krzemien; Daniele Fabris
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  High-Density Lipoprotein Biogenesis: Defining the Domains Involved in Human Apolipoprotein A-I Lipidation.

Authors:  Ricquita D Pollard; Brian Fulp; Mary G Sorci-Thomas; Michael J Thomas
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.