Literature DB >> 25981914

Ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) imaging of cortical bone.

Eric Y Chang1,2, Won C Bae1, Hongda Shao2, Reni Biswas2, Shihong Li2, Jun Chen2,3, Shantanu Patil4, Robert Healey2, Darryl D D'Lima4, Christine B Chung1,2, Jiang Du2.   

Abstract

Magnetization transfer (MT) imaging is one way to indirectly assess pools of protons with fast transverse relaxation. However, conventional MT imaging sequences are not applicable to short T2 tissues such as cortical bone. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences with TE values as low as 8 µs can detect signals from different water components in cortical bone. In this study we aim to evaluate two-dimensional UTE-MT imaging of cortical bone and its application in assessing cortical bone porosity as measured by micro-computed tomography (μCT) and biomechanical properties. In total, 38 human cadaveric distal femur and proximal tibia bones were sectioned to produce 122 rectangular pieces of cortical bone for quantitative UTE-MT MR imaging, μCT, and biomechanical testing. Off-resonance saturation ratios (OSRs) with a series of MT pulse frequency offsets (Δf) were calculated and compared with porosity assessed with μCT, as well as elastic (modulus, yield stress, and strain) and failure (ultimate stress, failure strain, and energy) properties, using Pearson correlation and linear regression. A moderately strong negative correlation was observed between OSR and μCT porosity (R(2)  = 0.46-0.51), while a moderate positive correlation was observed between OSR and yield stress (R(2)  = 0.25-0.30) and failure stress (R(2)  = 0.31-0.35), and a weak positive correlation (R(2)  = 0.09-0.12) between OSR and Young's modulus at all off-resonance saturation frequencies. OSR determined with the UTE-MT sequence provides quantitative information on cortical bone and is sensitive to μCT porosity and biomechanical function.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  UTE; cortical bone; magnetization transfer; off-resonance saturation ratio; porosity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25981914      PMCID: PMC4652942          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  29 in total

1.  Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review.

Authors:  R M Henkelman; G J Stanisz; S J Graham
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Magnetization transfer contrast imaging in bovine and human cortical bone applying an ultrashort echo time sequence at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Fabian Springer; Petros Martirosian; Jürgen Machann; Nina F Schwenzer; Claus D Claussen; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Physical characteristics affecting the tensile failure properties of compact bone.

Authors:  J D Currey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Deuterium nuclear magnetic resonance unambiguously quantifies pore and collagen-bound water in cortical bone.

Authors:  Henry H Ong; Alexander C Wright; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Characterization of 1H NMR signal in human cortical bone for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Jeffry S Nyman; Daniel F Gochberg; Richard D Dortch; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Ultra-short echo-time MRI detects changes in bone mineralization and water content in OVX rat bone in response to alendronate treatment.

Authors:  S Anumula; S L Wehrli; J Magland; A C Wright; F W Wehrli
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Systematic variation of off-resonance prepulses for clinical magnetization transfer contrast imaging at 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 tesla.

Authors:  Petros Martirosian; Andreas Boss; Michael Deimling; Berthold Kiefer; Christina Schraml; Nina F Schwenzer; Claus D Claussen; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Measurements of mobile and bound water by nuclear magnetic resonance correlate with mechanical properties of bone.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Qingwen Ni; Daniel P Nicolella; Xiaodu Wang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Non-invasive predictors of human cortical bone mechanical properties: T(2)-discriminated H NMR compared with high resolution X-ray.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Precise estimate of fundamental in-vivo MT parameters in human brain in clinically feasible times.

Authors:  A Ramani; C Dalton; D H Miller; P S Tofts; G J Barker
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  23 in total

1.  Quantitative two-dimensional ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (2D UTE-MT) imaging of cortical bone.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Anthony Tadros; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hard Tissues and Hard Tissue Engineered Bio-substitutes.

Authors:  Simone Mastrogiacomo; Weiqiang Dou; John A Jansen; X Frank Walboomers
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Magnetization transfer imaging of cortical bone in vivo using a zero echo time sequence in mice at 4.7 T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Magda Marcon; Markus Weiger; Daniel Keller; Moritz C Wurnig; Christian Eberhardt; Daniel Eberli; Andreas Boss
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Fast volumetric imaging of bound and pore water in cortical bone using three-dimensional ultrashort-TE (UTE) and inversion recovery UTE sequences.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Michael Carl; Yajun Ma; Hongda Shao; Xing Lu; Bimin Chen; Eric Y Chang; Zhihong Wu; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 5.  Cortical Bone Porosity: What Is It, Why Is It Important, and How Can We Detect It?

Authors:  D M L Cooper; C E Kawalilak; K Harrison; B D Johnston; J D Johnston
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Three-dimensional ultrashort echo time imaging with tricomponent analysis for human cortical bone.

Authors:  Xing Lu; Saeed Jerban; Lidi Wan; Yajun Ma; Hyungseok Jang; Nicole Le; Wenhui Yang; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Collagen proton fraction from ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) MRI modelling correlates significantly with cortical bone porosity measured with micro-computed tomography (μCT).

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Lidi Wan; Adam C Searleman; Hyungseok Jang; Robert L Sah; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE-MRI) of cortical bone correlates well with histomorphometric assessment of bone microstructure.

Authors:  Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Jonathan H Wong; Amin Nazaran; Adam Searleman; Lidi Wan; Judith Williams; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Can ultrashort-TE (UTE) MRI sequences on a 3-T clinical scanner detect signal directly from collagen protons: freeze-dry and D2 O exchange studies of cortical bone and Achilles tendon specimens.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Graeme M Bydder; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Feasibility of quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE)-based methods for MRI of peripheral nerve.

Authors:  Shu-Juan Fan; Jonathan Wong; Xin Cheng; Ya-Jun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du; Sameer B Shah
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.