Literature DB >> 18097273

Systematic variation of off-resonance prepulses for clinical magnetization transfer contrast imaging at 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 tesla.

Petros Martirosian1, Andreas Boss, Michael Deimling, Berthold Kiefer, Christina Schraml, Nina F Schwenzer, Claus D Claussen, Fritz Schick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the presented study was to evaluate pulsed magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) effects using saturation pulses of variable off-resonance frequency and radio frequency (RF) amplitude for a variety of tissue types (white and gray matter, liver, kidney, spleen, muscle, and articular cartilage) in human subjects at field strengths of 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MTC imaging studies of the head, knee, and abdomen were performed using an adapted multiple MTC (mMTC) module in 3 healthy volunteers for all field strengths. This mMTC pulse module applies a variable Gaussian shaped magnetization transfer (MT) saturation pulse in a proton-density weighted RF-spoiled gradient echo sequence. It allows for both a flexible MT pulse design and performance of consecutive measurements with variation of amplitude and off-resonance frequency, whereas keeping other MT pulse parameters unchanged. Magnetization transfer signal ratio (MTR) maps were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Additional mMTC imaging measurements were performed using an agar-water phantom. For assessment of undesired direct saturation effects of the MT pulse on the water pool, numerical simulations based on Bloch's equations were performed and analyzed.
RESULTS: The results indicate that MTR values for given MT pulses (pulse shape, off-resonance frequency and flip angle) are larger at higher magnetic field strengths. For white matter, gray matter, cartilage, and muscle, an increase of 10% to 30% was found at 3.0 T when compared with 1.5 T. Low magnetic field strength of 0.2 T led to MTR values of one third to half the values at 1.5 T. MTR values for abdominal tissues were partly lower at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T, which might be related to reduced B1 field strengths at 3.0 T due to dielectric effects.
CONCLUSIONS: The increased MT effect at a higher field strength can partly compensate the specific absorption rate related problems in MTC applications. It is shown that for flip angles of 700 degrees to 900 degrees and offset frequencies of 1000 Hz to 1500 Hz, high quality MTR maps could be obtained at an acceptable level of direct saturation for all field strengths. Furthermore, if the better signal-to-noise ratio at higher magnetic fields is taken into account, quality of MTR maps of the head and the knee at 3.0 T was clearly improved compared with lower fields under optimized and comparable conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18097273     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181559949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  8 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Choi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Magnetization transfer imaging of cortical bone in vivo using a zero echo time sequence in mice at 4.7 T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Magda Marcon; Markus Weiger; Daniel Keller; Moritz C Wurnig; Christian Eberhardt; Daniel Eberli; Andreas Boss
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) imaging of cortical bone.

Authors:  Eric Y Chang; Won C Bae; Hongda Shao; Reni Biswas; Shihong Li; Jun Chen; Shantanu Patil; Robert Healey; Darryl D D'Lima; Christine B Chung; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Comprehensive brain analysis with automated high-resolution magnetization transfer measurements.

Authors:  Ying Wu; Hongyan Du; Pippa Storey; Christopher Glielmi; Fiona Malone; Shawn Sidharthan; Ann Ragin; Paul S Tofts; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Magnetisation transfer MR imaging of the kidney: evaluation at 3.0 T in association with renal function.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Ito; Minoru Hayashida; Shogo Izumitani; Tomoko Fujimine; Takeo Onishi; Katsuhiro Genba
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The application of T1 and T2 relaxation time and magnetization transfer ratios to the early diagnosis of patellar cartilage osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Weiwu Yao; Nan Qu; Zhihua Lu; Shixun Yang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Incidental magnetization transfer contrast by fat saturation preparation pulses in multislice Look-Locker echo planar imaging.

Authors:  Wanyong Shin; Hong Gu; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Magnetization transfer imaging reveals geniculocalcarine and striate area degeneration in primary glaucoma: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Wenwen Liang; Guijun Wu; Xuelin Zhang; Ge Wen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2016-09-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.