Literature DB >> 17964874

Measurements of mobile and bound water by nuclear magnetic resonance correlate with mechanical properties of bone.

Jeffry S Nyman1, Qingwen Ni, Daniel P Nicolella, Xiaodu Wang.   

Abstract

Since clinical measures of bone mineral density do not necessarily predict whether a person will fracture a bone without an intervention, there is a need to find supplementary tools for assessing bone quality. Presently, we hypothesized that measures of mobile and bound water by a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) technique are correlated with bone strength and toughness, respectively. To test this, bending specimens from the mid-diaphysis of 18 human femurs were collected from 18 male donors and divided into middle aged and elderly groups. After NMR measurements of each hydrated specimen, an inversion technique was used to convert the free induction decay data into a distribution of spin-spin (T2) relaxation rates. Then, the distribution resolved into three distinct components that likely represent solid hydrogen, water bound to bone tissue, and mobile water that occupy microscopic pores within the bone specimen. The integrated signal intensities of the bound and mobile components were normalized by the wet mass of the specimen. Following NMR measurements, three point bending tests were conducted to determine the modulus of elasticity, flexure strength, and work to fracture of each specimen. Next, the porosity, mineral-to-collagen ratio, and pentosidine concentration were measured. In this sample of human cortical bone, there was no age-related difference in the amount of mobile water, but the decrease in the amount of bound water with increasing age was statistically significant. Moreover, bound water was associated with both strength and work to fracture of bone, while mobile water was correlated with modulus of elasticity and appeared to quantify the level of microscopic pores within bone. On the other hand, bound water was correlated with the concentration of non-enzymatic collagen cross-links. The results of this study indicate that quantifying mobile and bound water with magnetic resonance techniques could potentially serve as indicators of bone quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17964874      PMCID: PMC2275807          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.09.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  54 in total

1.  Understanding bone strength: size isn't everything.

Authors:  M C van der Meulen; K J Jepsen; B Mikić
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Diffusion of exchangeable water in cortical bone studied by nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Maria A Fernández-Seara; Suzanne L Wehrli; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Determination of cortical bone porosity and pore size distribution using a low field pulsed NMR approach.

Authors:  Xiaodu Wang; Qingwen Ni
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Bone tissue and porous media: common features and differences studied by NMR relaxation.

Authors:  Paola Fantazzini; Robert James Sidford Brown; Giulio Cesare Borgia
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; A Dawson; C De Laet; B Jonsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Prediction of fracture risk. I: Bone density.

Authors:  P D Miller; M McClung
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.378

7.  Distribution of intracortical porosity in human midfemoral cortex by age and gender.

Authors:  V Bousson; A Meunier; C Bergot; E Vicaut; M A Rocha; M H Morais; A M Laval-Jeantet; J D Laredo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Spectroscopic characterization of collagen cross-links in bone.

Authors:  E P Paschalis; K Verdelis; S B Doty; A L Boskey; R Mendelsohn; M Yamauchi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Nuclear magnetic resonance spin-spin relaxation of the crystals of bone, dental enamel, and synthetic hydroxyapatites.

Authors:  Yaotang Wu; Jerome L Ackerman; Hyun-Man Kim; Christian Rey; Allal Barroug; Melvin J Glimcher
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Age-related changes in the collagen network and toughness of bone.

Authors:  X Wang; X Shen; X Li; C Mauli Agrawal
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  81 in total

1.  Quantitative two-dimensional ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (2D UTE-MT) imaging of cortical bone.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Anthony Tadros; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Methods for assessing bone quality: a review.

Authors:  Eve Donnelly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Measurement of the mechanical properties of bone: a recent history.

Authors:  John Currey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Constitutive relationship of tissue behavior with damage accumulation of human cortical bone.

Authors:  Qing Luo; Huijie Leng; Rae Acuna; Xuanliang Neil Dong; Qiguo Rong; Xiaodu Wang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hard Tissues and Hard Tissue Engineered Bio-substitutes.

Authors:  Simone Mastrogiacomo; Weiqiang Dou; John A Jansen; X Frank Walboomers
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Interfibril hydrogen bonding improves the strain-rate response of natural armour.

Authors:  D Arola; S Ghods; C Son; S Murcia; E A Ossa
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Fractal-like hierarchical organization of bone begins at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Natalie Reznikov; Matthew Bilton; Leonardo Lari; Molly M Stevens; Roland Kröger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Cortical bone water concentration: dependence of MR imaging measures on age and pore volume fraction.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Alan C Seifert; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Yusuf A Bhagat; Chamith S Rajapakse; Wenli Sun; Shing Chun Benny Lam; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Bone cell-independent benefits of raloxifene on the skeleton: a novel mechanism for improving bone material properties.

Authors:  Maxime A Gallant; Drew M Brown; Max Hammond; Joseph M Wallace; Jiang Du; Alix C Deymier-Black; Jonathan D Almer; Stuart R Stock; Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The Behavior of Water in Collagen and Hydroxyapatite Sites of Cortical Bone: Fracture, Mechanical Wear, and Load Bearing Studies.

Authors:  Farhana Gul-E-Noor; Chandan Singh; Antonios Papaioannou; Neeraj Sinha; Gregory S Boutis
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.