Ya-Jun Ma1, Anthony Tadros1, Jiang Du1, Eric Y Chang1,2. 1. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA. 2. Radiology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate quantitative 2D ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) imaging in ex vivo bovine cortical bone and in vivo human tibial cortical bone. METHODS: Data were acquired from five fresh bovine cortical bone samples and five healthy volunteer tibial cortical bones using a 2D UTE-MT sequence on a clinical 3T scanner. The 2D UTE-MT sequence used four or five MT powers with five frequency offsets. Results were analyzed with a two-pool quantitative MT model, providing measurements of macromolecular fraction (f), macromolecular proton transverse relaxation times (T2m ), proton exchange rates from water/macromolecular to the macromolecular/water pool (RM0m /RM0w ), and spin-lattice relaxation rate of water pool (R1w ). A sequential air-drying study for a small bovine cortical bone chip was used to investigate whether above MT modeling parameters were sensitive to the water loss. RESULTS: Mean fresh bovine cortical bone values for f, T2m , R1w , RM0m , and RM0w were 59.9 ± 7.3%, 14.6 ± 0.3 μs, 9.9 ± 2.4 s-1 , 17.9 ± 3.6 s-1 , and 11.8 ± 2.0 s-1 , respectively. Mean in vivo human cortical bone values for f, T2m , R1w , RM0m and RM0w were 54.5 ± 4.9%, 15.4 ± 0.6 μs, 8.9 ± 1.1 s-1 , 11.5 ± 3.5 s-1 , and 9.5 ± 1.9 s-1 , respectively. The sequential air-drying study shows that f, RM0m , and R1w were increased with longer drying time. CONCLUSION: UTE-MT two-pool modeling provides novel and useful quantitative information for cortical bone. Magn Reson Med 79:1941-1949, 2018.
PURPOSE: To investigate quantitative 2D ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) imaging in ex vivo bovine cortical bone and in vivo human tibial cortical bone. METHODS: Data were acquired from five fresh bovine cortical bone samples and five healthy volunteer tibial cortical bones using a 2D UTE-MT sequence on a clinical 3T scanner. The 2D UTE-MT sequence used four or five MT powers with five frequency offsets. Results were analyzed with a two-pool quantitative MT model, providing measurements of macromolecular fraction (f), macromolecular proton transverse relaxation times (T2m ), proton exchange rates from water/macromolecular to the macromolecular/water pool (RM0m /RM0w ), and spin-lattice relaxation rate of water pool (R1w ). A sequential air-drying study for a small bovine cortical bone chip was used to investigate whether above MT modeling parameters were sensitive to the water loss. RESULTS: Mean fresh bovine cortical bone values for f, T2m , R1w , RM0m , and RM0w were 59.9 ± 7.3%, 14.6 ± 0.3 μs, 9.9 ± 2.4 s-1 , 17.9 ± 3.6 s-1 , and 11.8 ± 2.0 s-1 , respectively. Mean in vivo human cortical bone values for f, T2m , R1w , RM0m and RM0w were 54.5 ± 4.9%, 15.4 ± 0.6 μs, 8.9 ± 1.1 s-1 , 11.5 ± 3.5 s-1 , and 9.5 ± 1.9 s-1 , respectively. The sequential air-drying study shows that f, RM0m , and R1w were increased with longer drying time. CONCLUSION: UTE-MT two-pool modeling provides novel and useful quantitative information for cortical bone. Magn Reson Med 79:1941-1949, 2018.
Authors: Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Shing Chun Benny Lam; Jeremy F Magland; Henry Ong; Cheng Li; Hee Kwon Song; James Love; Felix W Wehrli Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Jiang Du; Michael Carl; Mark Bydder; Atsushi Takahashi; Christine B Chung; Graeme M Bydder Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2010-09-25 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Richard J Hodgson; Robert Evans; Peter Wright; Andrew J Grainger; Philip J O'Connor; Philip Helliwell; Dennis McGonagle; Paul Emery; Matthew D Robson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Basil H Ridha; Daniel J Tozer; Mark R Symms; Katherine C Stockton; Emma B Lewis; Musib M Siddique; David G MacManus; Martin N Rossor; Nick C Fox; Paul S Tofts Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Behnam Namiranian; Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Erik W Dorthe; Amir Masoud-Afsahi; Jonathan Wong; Zhao Wei; Yanjun Chen; Darryl D'Lima; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: J Biomech Date: 2020-10-24 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Lidi Wan; Adam C Searleman; Hyungseok Jang; Robert L Sah; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Jonathan H Wong; Amin Nazaran; Adam Searleman; Lidi Wan; Judith Williams; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang Journal: Bone Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Liang Li; Hyungseok Jang; Lidi Wan; Tan Guo; Adam Searleman; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Bone Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: X Zhang; Y-J Ma; Z Wei; M Wu; A Ashir; S Jerban; S Li; E Y Chang; J Du Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2021-04-18 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Mohsen Afarideh; Kai Jiang; Christopher M Ferguson; John R Woollard; James F Glockner; Lilach O Lerman Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 10.065
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Erik W Dorthe; Lena Kakos; Nicole Le; Salem Alenezi; Robert L Sah; Eric Y Chang; Darryl D'Lima; Jiang Du Journal: Bone Rep Date: 2019-08-02