Literature DB >> 25972580

Sound frequency-invariant neural coding of a frequency-dependent cue to sound source location.

Heath G Jones1, Andrew D Brown2, Kanthaiah Koka2, Jennifer L Thornton1, Daniel J Tollin3.   

Abstract

The century-old duplex theory of sound localization posits that low- and high-frequency sounds are localized with two different acoustical cues, interaural time and level differences (ITDs and ILDs), respectively. While behavioral studies in humans and behavioral and neurophysiological studies in a variety of animal models have largely supported the duplex theory, behavioral sensitivity to ILD is curiously invariant across the audible spectrum. Here we demonstrate that auditory midbrain neurons in the chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) also encode ILDs in a frequency-invariant manner, efficiently representing the full range of acoustical ILDs experienced as a joint function of sound source frequency, azimuth, and distance. We further show, using Fisher information, that nominal "low-frequency" and "high-frequency" ILD-sensitive neural populations can discriminate ILD with similar acuity, yielding neural ILD discrimination thresholds for near-midline sources comparable to behavioral discrimination thresholds estimated for chinchillas. These findings thus suggest a revision to the duplex theory and reinforce ecological and efficiency principles that hold that neural systems have evolved to encode the spectrum of biologically relevant sensory signals to which they are naturally exposed.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inferior colliculus; interaural level difference; low-frequency neurons; sound localization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25972580      PMCID: PMC4509402          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00062.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  57 in total

1.  Effects of reverberation on the directional sensitivity of auditory neurons across the tonotopic axis: influences of interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Sasha Devore; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Varying overall sound intensity to the two ears impacts interaural level difference discrimination thresholds by single neurons in the lateral superior olive.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tsai; Kanthaiah Koka; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Electrocochleographic and mechanical assessment of round window stimulation with an active middle ear prosthesis.

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; N Julian Holland; J Eric Lupo; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Dichotic pitches as illusions of binaural unmasking. I. Huggins' pitch and the "binaural edge pitch".

Authors:  J F Culling; A Q Summerfield; D H Marshall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Simple models for reading neuronal population codes.

Authors:  H S Seung; H Sompolinsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Binaural response characteristics in isofrequency sheets of the gerbil inferior colliculus.

Authors:  S Brückner; R Rübsamen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Acoustic recordings in human ear canals to sounds at different locations.

Authors:  Clinton A Kuwada; Brian Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada; Duck O Kim
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Sound localization in chinchillas. I: Left/right discriminations.

Authors:  R S Heffner; H E Heffner; D Kearns; J Vogel; G Koay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Acoustic cues for sound source distance and azimuth in rabbits, a racquetball and a rigid spherical model.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Brian Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-05
View more
  12 in total

1.  Representation of Multidimensional Stimuli: Quantifying the Most Informative Stimulus Dimension from Neural Responses.

Authors:  Victor Benichoux; Andrew D Brown; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Multisensory activation of ventral cochlear nucleus D-stellate cells modulates dorsal cochlear nucleus principal cell spatial coding.

Authors:  Calvin Wu; Susan E Shore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Susan A McLaughlin; Teemu Rinne; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Establishing an Animal Model of Single-Sided Deafness in Chinchilla lanigera.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Nathaniel T Greene; Victor Benichoux; Anna Dondzillo; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Spatial variation in signal and sensory precision both constrain auditory acuity at high frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Victor Benichoux; Heath G Jones; Kelsey L Anbuhl; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Slow Temporal Integration Enables Robust Neural Coding and Perception of a Cue to Sound Source Location.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing.

Authors:  Kiki van der Heijden; Josef P Rauschecker; Beatrice de Gelder; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Effects of interaural decoherence on sensitivity to interaural level differences across frequency.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Processing of frequency and location in human subcortical auditory structures.

Authors:  Michelle Moerel; Federico De Martino; Kâmil Uğurbil; Essa Yacoub; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The chinchilla animal model for hearing science and noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Edward Lobarinas; Amanda C Maulden; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.