Literature DB >> 21774608

Response selection during a joint action task.

Matthew Ray1, Timothy N Welsh.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that a shared task representation is used to predict a coactors' needs and that these predictions influence each coactor's response selection in a joint action task. The authors tested this idea using a joint action task in which participants passed a jug to a confederate under different conditions. They hypothesized that if participants predicted the needs of their coactor and planned their movement according to these predictions, the jug would be passed with the handle available to the confederate. Consistent with this hypothesis, the jug was passed with the handle available on 86% of the trials. This strategy may be adopted to improve the efficiency of the whole task as opposed to each individual's portion of the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21774608     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2011.592871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  19 in total

Review 1.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Social categorization and cooperation in motor joint action: evidence for a joint end-state comfort.

Authors:  Dominik Dötsch; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different.

Authors:  Joseph Manzone; Geoff G Cole; Paul A Skarratt; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-08-16

4.  Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention.

Authors:  Dovin Kiernan; Matthew Ray; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

5.  Planning my actions to accommodate yours: joint action development during early childhood.

Authors:  Marlene Meyer; Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Sabine Hunnius
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Higher-order action planning for individual and joint object manipulations.

Authors:  Marlene Meyer; Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Sabine Hunnius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of object size on second-order planning in an overturned cup task.

Authors:  Sara M Scharoun Benson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-04

8.  Spatiotemporal movement planning and rapid adaptation for manual interaction.

Authors:  Markus Huber; Aleksandra Kupferberg; Claus Lenz; Alois Knoll; Thomas Brandt; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Motor interactions with another person: do individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder plan ahead?

Authors:  David A Gonzalez; Cheryl M Glazebrook; Breanna E Studenka; Jim Lyons
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-17

10.  Action and perception in social contexts: intentional binding for social action effects.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Sukhvinder S Obhi; Martina Rieger; Dorit Wenke
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.