Literature DB >> 18633833

Action co-representation: the joint SNARC effect.

Silke Atmaca1, Natalie Sebanz, Wolfgang Prinz, Günther Knoblich.   

Abstract

Traditionally, communication has been defined as the intentional exchange of symbolic information between individuals. In contrast, the mirror system provides a basis for nonsymbolic and nonintentional information exchange between individuals. We believe that understanding the role of the mirror system in joint action has the potential to serve as a bridge between these two domains. The present study investigates one crucial component of joint action: the ability to represent others' potential actions in the same way as one's own in the absence of perceptual evidence. In two experiments a joint spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect is demonstrated, providing further evidence that individuals form functionally equivalent representations of their own and others' potential actions. It is shown that numerical (symbolic) stimuli that are mapped onto a spatially arranged internal representation (a mental number line) can activate a co-represented action in the same way as spatial stimuli. This generalizes previous results on co-representation.We discuss the role of the mirror system in co-representation as a basis for shared intentionality and communication.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18633833     DOI: 10.1080/17470910801900908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Neurosci        ISSN: 1747-0919            Impact factor:   2.083


  40 in total

1.  Interactional leader-follower sensorimotor communication strategies during repetitive joint actions.

Authors:  Matteo Candidi; Arianna Curioni; Francesco Donnarumma; Lucia Maria Sacheli; Giovanni Pezzulo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Action or attention in social inhibition of return?

Authors:  Silviya P Doneva; Mark A Atkinson; Paul A Skarratt; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-26

3.  Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.

Authors:  Marco Fabbri; Matteo Frisoni; Monica Martoni; Lorenzo Tonetti; Vincenzo Natale
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-11-28

4.  How two share two tasks: evidence of a social psychological refractory period effect.

Authors:  Roman Liepelt; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Antje Holländer; Christina Jung; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Sharing a bimanual task between two: evidence of temporal alignment in interpersonal coordination.

Authors:  Christina Jung; Antje Holländer; Karsten Müller; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.

Authors:  Bibiana Klempova; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-04-02

Review 8.  Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Andrew A Simpson; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

9.  Synchrony effect on joint attention.

Authors:  Marco Fabbri; Matteo Frisoni; Monica Martoni; Lorenzo Tonetti; Vincenzo Natale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Bimanual joint action: correlated timing or "bimanual" movements accomplished by two people.

Authors:  Melanie Y Lam; Jarrod Blinch; Elizabeth M Connors; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.