Expanded genetic systems are most likely to work with natural enzymes if the added nucleotides pair with geometries that are similar to those displayed by standard duplex DNA. Here, we present crystal structures of 16-mer duplexes showing this to be the case with two nonstandard nucleobases (Z, 6-amino-5-nitro-2(1H)-pyridone and P, 2-amino-imidazo[1,2-a]-1,3,5-triazin-4(8H)one) that were designed to form a Z:P pair with a standard "edge on" Watson-Crick geometry, but joined by rearranged hydrogen bond donor and acceptor groups. One duplex, with four Z:P pairs, was crystallized with a reverse transcriptase host and adopts primarily a B-form. Another contained six consecutive Z:P pairs; it crystallized without a host in an A-form. In both structures, Z:P pairs fit canonical nucleobase hydrogen-bonding parameters and known DNA helical forms. Unique features include stacking of the nitro group on Z with the adjacent nucleobase ring in the A-form duplex. In both B- and A-duplexes, major groove widths for the Z:P pairs are approximately 1 Å wider than those of comparable G:C pairs, perhaps to accommodate the large nitro group on Z. Otherwise, ZP-rich DNA had many of the same properties as CG-rich DNA, a conclusion supported by circular dichroism studies in solution. The ability of standard duplexes to accommodate multiple and consecutive Z:P pairs is consistent with the ability of natural polymerases to biosynthesize those pairs. This, in turn, implies that the GACTZP synthetic genetic system can explore the entire expanded sequence space that additional nucleotides create, a major step forward in this area of synthetic biology.
Expanded genetic systems are most likely to work with natural enzymes if the added nucleotides pair with geometries that are similar to those dispn>layed by standard duplex DNA. Here, we present crystal structures of 16-mer duplexes showing this to be the case with two nonstandard n>an class="Chemical">nucleobases(Z, 6-amino-5-nitro-2(1H)-pyridone and P, 2-amino-imidazo[1,2-a]-1,3,5-triazin-4(8H)one) that were designed to form a Z:P pair with a standard "edge on" Watson-Crick geometry, but joined by rearranged hydrogen bond donor and acceptor groups. One duplex, with four Z:P pairs, was crystallized with a reverse transcriptase host and adopts primarily a B-form. Another contained six consecutive Z:P pairs; it crystallized without a host in an A-form. In both structures, Z:P pairs fit canonical nucleobasehydrogen-bonding parameters and known DNA helical forms. Unique features include stacking of the nitro group on Z with the adjacent nucleobase ring in the A-form duplex. In both B- and A-duplexes, major groove widths for the Z:P pairs are approximately 1 Å wider than those of comparable G:C pairs, perhaps to accommodate the large nitro group on Z. Otherwise, ZP-rich DNA had many of the same properties as CG-rich DNA, a conclusion supported by circular dichroism studies in solution. The ability of standard duplexes to accommodate multiple and consecutive Z:P pairs is consistent with the ability of natural polymerases to biosynthesize those pairs. This, in turn, implies that the GACTZPsynthetic genetic system can explore the entire expanded sequence space that additional nucleotides create, a major step forward in this area of synthetic biology.
Authors: Kwame Sefah; Zunyi Yang; Kevin M Bradley; Shuichi Hoshika; Elizabeth Jiménez; Liqin Zhang; Guizhi Zhu; Savita Shanker; Fahong Yu; Diane Turek; Weihong Tan; Steven A Benner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read Journal: J Appl Crystallogr Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 3.304
Authors: Isha Singh; Myong-Jung Kim; Robert W Molt; Shuichi Hoshika; Steven A Benner; Millie M Georgiadis Journal: ACS Synth Biol Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 5.110
Authors: Steven A Benner; Nilesh B Karalkar; Shuichi Hoshika; Roberto Laos; Ryan W Shaw; Mariko Matsuura; Diego Fajardo; Patricia Moussatche Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 10.005
Authors: Jie Tan; Mengmeng Zhao; Jie Wang; Zhihao Li; Ling Liang; Liqin Zhang; Quan Yuan; Weihong Tan Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Markus Probst; Walter Aeschimann; Thi T H Chau; Simon M Langenegger; Achim Stocker; Robert Häner Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 16.971