Literature DB >> 25961578

Epidemiology and prognosis of coagulase-negative staphylococcal endocarditis: impact of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.

Cristina García de la Mària1, Carlos Cervera1, Juan M Pericàs1, Ximena Castañeda1, Yolanda Armero1, Dolors Soy2, Manel Almela3, Salvador Ninot4, Carlos Falces5, Carlos A Mestres4, Jose M Gatell1, Asuncion Moreno1, Francesc Marco3, José M Miró1.   

Abstract

This study describes coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) infective endocarditis (IE) epidemiology at our institution, the antibiotic susceptibility profile, and the influence of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) on patient outcomes. One hundred and three adults with definite IE admitted to an 850-bed tertiary care hospital in Barcelona from 1995-2008 were prospectively included in the cohort. We observed that CoNS IE was an important cause of community-acquired and healthcare-associated IE; one-third of patients involved native valves. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most frequent species, methicillin-resistant in 52% of patients. CoNS frozen isolates were available in 88 patients. Vancomycin MICs of 2.0 μg/mL were common; almost all cases were found among S. epidermidis isolates and did not increase over time. Eighty-five patients were treated either with cloxacillin or vancomycin: 38 patients (Group 1) were treated with cloxacillin, and 47 received vancomycin; of these 47, 27 had CoNS isolates with a vancomycin MIC <2.0 μg/mL (Group 2), 20 had isolates with a vancomycin MIC ≥ 2.0 μg/mL (Group 3). One-year mortality was 21%, 48%, and 65% in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.003). After adjusting for confounders and taking Group 2 as a reference, methicillin-susceptibility was associated with lower 1-year mortality (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.55), and vancomycin MIC ≥ 2.0 μg/mL showed a trend to higher 1-year mortality (OR 3.7, 95% CI 0.9-15.2; P=0.069). Other independent variables associated with 1-year mortality were heart failure (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.5-25.2) and pacemaker lead IE (OR 0.1, 95%CI 0.02-0.51). In conclusion, methicillin-resistant S.epidermidis was the leading cause of CoNS IE, and patients receiving vancomycin had higher mortality rates than those receiving cloxacillin; mortality was higher among patients having isolates with vancomycin MICs ≥ 2.0 μg/mL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25961578      PMCID: PMC4427314          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) have come to be recognized as important, commonly isolated pathogens [1,2]. Infections are usually associated with healthcare settings and occur in patients harbouring indwelling polymer or metallic devices [3]. CoNS cause >10% of all infective endocarditis (IE) cases [4] and are among the most frequent etiological agents of intracardiac prosthetic device infections, such as prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and intracardiac device (ICD) endocarditis [5-7]. In addition, these microorganisms are becoming an important cause of native valve endocarditis (NVE) [8]. Among CoNS species, Staphylococcus lugdunensis is notable for its particular virulence [9]. Resistance to methicillin and other antibiotics is becoming more frequent among CoNS. A glycopeptide, such as vancomycin, is the recommended treatment for methicillin-resistant CoNS (MR-CoNS) NVE, while gentamicin and rifampin are typically added in PVE [10]. The emergence of CoNS with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin [3], together with the increasing prevalence of glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus epidermidis (GISE) [11] and resistance to rifampin and gentamicin among methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE), limits therapeutic options and warrants investigation of alternative bactericidal agents. Among patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, increased vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) have been associated with clinical failures [12], while vancomycin MICs >1 μg/mL have been associated with higher mortality [13]. There currently are no data regarding the influence of vancomycin MIC on the outcome of CoNS IE. This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of CoNS IE, and the influence of methicillin susceptibility and vancomycin MIC on outcomes.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was performed in an urban tertiary care hospital with 850 beds in Barcelona, Spain. All consecutive CoNS IE patients seen from 1995 to 2008 were recorded in a database using a standardized case report form. Only patients with a definite diagnosis of IE [14] were included. All survivors were followed ≥1 year. The Ethics Committee of our institution gave its approval to perform the current study. The variables analyzed, including age, gender, history of chronic disease, calendar year, right- vs. left-sided IE, type of endocarditis (NVE, PVE, or ICD-associated), place of acquisition (community-acquired, nosocomial, or non-nosocomial healthcare-associated) [15], clinical complications (heart failure, renal failure, or systemic emboli, including stroke), need for surgery, and in-hospital and 1-year mortality, have been previously defined [16]. Due to the duration of the study period, antimicrobial treatment for CoNS IE was given according to the 1995 (originally) and 2005 (later) American Heart Association (AHA) recommendations [10,17], both of which recommend the same agents for CoNS IE. Methicillin-susceptible CoNS (MS-CoNS) IE was treated with cloxacillin, and MR-CoNS IE was treated with either vancomycin alone (NVE) or combined with other antibiotics (PVE or ICD IE). The decision of using monotherapy or combination was at the discretion of the treating physician and influenced by factors related to patient’ clinical status (ie, renal function, drug allergy, potential drug interactions, comorbidity, age). Per guidelines of the time [10,17], a vancomycin trough concentration of 10–15 μg/mL was targeted. In order to analyze the impact of methicillin resistance and vancomycin MIC on outcomes, we divided patients into 3 groups: patients treated with cloxacillin for MS-CoNS IE (Group 1), vancomycin for CoNS with vancomycin MIC <2 μg/mL (Group 2), or vancomycin for CoNS with vancomycin MIC ≥2 μg/mL (Group 3). In the event of polyclonal or polymicrobial CoNS IE, we categorized patients per the higher vancomycin MIC.

Identification of CoNS Isolates

Isolates were stored at -80°C in skim milk. Isolates were identified using the API ID 32 Staph (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Species were divided into 4 groups: S. epidermidis, S. lugdunensis, other CoNS, and polymicrobial IE. Polymicrobial infections were caused by different CoNS isolates. Polyclonal CoNS infections were caused by ≥2 isolates of the same species with different antibiotic susceptibilities and each isolate was counted separately.

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Susceptibility was determined by Etest according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (AB Biodisk-bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Etest strips were purchased from bioMérieux (Madrid, Spain). The following antimicrobials were evaluated: penicillin, oxacillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, rifampin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and daptomycin. The latter 2 agents were tested retrospectively after they became available and with emerging data about the impact of elevated vancomycin MICs. S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used as the test control strain. For vancomycin, isolates were divided according to MIC (<2 μg/mL or ≥2 μg/mL).

Statistical Analyses

Categorical variables were summarized as percentages and compared using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were summarized as mean and SD. The Mantel-Haenszel test for trend was used if there were significant differences in vancomycin MIC over time among the isolates. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for survival analysis, and curves were compared using the log-rank test. For logistic regression analysis, predictors with a P<0.30 were included, and it was performed by a likelihood ratio-based backward exclusion method. A 2-sided P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All statistics were calculated with SPSS statistical package version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Clinical Characteristics of CoNS IE

There were 103 patients with CoNS IE during the study, representing 16% of the 620 IE cases diagnosed at our institution (Fig 1). Regarding the type of IE, 36 (35%) were ICD-associated, 31 (30%) were PVE, and 36 (35%) were NVE. Stored CoNS isolates were available for 88 patients, in whom 98 isolates were identified. Isolates could not be obtained in the others due to transfer from another institution.
Fig 1

Patient disposition.

Abbreviations: IE, infective endocarditis; NV, native valve; PV, prosthetic valve; CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Patient disposition.

Abbreviations: IE, infective endocarditis; NV, native valve; PV, prosthetic valve; CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of these 103 patients are summarized by type of endocarditis in Table 1. The majority of infections were due to S. epidermidis, while the species was not identified in 15 (15%) patients. In 59 (57%) patients, isolates were susceptible to methicillin, with a lower rate in PVE (36%) compared with NVE (61%) or ICD IE (72%) (P = 0.009). The aortic valve was most commonly involved, but 13 (13%) patients had involvement of multiple valves. While vegetations were present in 82 (80%) patients, only 13 (13%) patients had evidence of systemic emboli. Median vegetation size was greatest in ICD IE (P = 0.007); perivalvular abscesses were most common among patients with PVE (P<0.001). Sixty-six patients (64%) required surgery, including almost all patients with ICD IE. Mortality rates were similar within the NVE and PVE groups and lowest among patients with ICD IE (P<0.001).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics and outcome of 103 consecutive patients with IE due to CoNS, according to the type of endocarditis (1995–2008).

NVE (N = 36)PVE (N = 31)ICD IE (N = 36) P value
Mean age (SD), y61.8 (16.7)60.7 (11.3)62.1 (19.4)0.506
Male gender27 (75)24 (77)30 (83)0.676
Year of diagnosis0.560
1995–199913 (36)9 (29)9 (25)
2000–200414 (39)9 (29)15 (42)
2005–20089 (25)13 (42)12 (33)
CoNS species a 0.400
S. epidermidis 17 (47)18 (58)25 (69)
S. lugdunensis 4 (11)2 (7)5 (14)
Other CoNS b 4 (11)4 (13)3 (8)
Polymicrobial4 (11)1 (3)1 (3)
Unknown7 (20)6 (19)2 (6)
Methicillin susceptibility22 (61)11 (36)26 (72)0.009
Predisposing conditions and underlying diseases
Diabetes mellitus1 (3)8 (26)4 (11)0.015
Chronic renal failure4 (11)2 (7)1 (3)0.386
Hemodialysis4 (11)000.034
History of cancer4 (11)5 (16)2 (6)0.239
HIV infection1 (3)001.000
Chronic liver disease9 (25)3 (10)2 (6)0.036
Chronic lung disease02 (7)3 (8)0.267
Transplantation1 (3)001.000
Presumed mode of acquisition0.004
Nosocomial11 (31)4 (13)6 (17)
Non-nosocomial health care associated11 (31)18 (58)7 (19)
Community acquired14 (39)9 (29)23 (64)
Valve involvement<0.001
Aortic14 (39)12 (39)1 (3) c
Mitral13 (36)11 (36)0
Tricuspid1 (3)1 (3)3 (8) c
PCM/ICD wire c 0034 (94)
Unknown1 (3)1 (3)0
Mitral + aortic4 (11)5 (16)0
Tricuspid + aortic2 (6)00
Tricuspid + aortic + mitral1 (3)1 (3)0
Echocardiographic findings
Presence of vegetations31 (86)25 (81)26 (72)0.338
Vegetation size in mm, median (IQR)10 (7–15)10 (6.5–15.5)20 (10–25)0.007
Perivalvular abscess4 (11)15 (48)0<0.001
Complications
Heart failure15 (42)11 (36)0<0.001
Renal failure20 (56)18 (58)4 (11)<0.001
Systemic emboli4 (11)9 (29)00.001
Antibiotic treatment0.098
Cloxacillin alone1 (3)1 (3)6 (17)
Cloxacillin in combination d 13 (36)8 (26)16 (44)
Vancomycin alone4 (11)5 (16)3 (8)
Vancomycin in combination c 15 (42)16 (52)11 (31)
Other antibiotics e 3 (8)1 (3)0
Outcome
Surgical treatment11 (31)22 (71)33 (92)<0.001
In-hospital mortality16 (44)14 (45)2 (6)<0.001
1-year mortality20 (56)16 (52)3 (8)<0.001

Unless otherwise noted, all values are shown as n (%). Abbreviations: CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ICD, intracardiac device; IE, infective endocarditis; IQR, interquartile range; NVE, native valve endocarditis; PCM/ICD, pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; PVE, prosthetic valve endocarditis; SD, standard deviation.

aOnly 88 patients had available isolates; these 88 patients served as the basis for the rest of the study (see Fig 1).

b S. hominis (7), S. capitis (2), S. schleiferi (2).

cPCM/ICD wire endocarditis was associated with tricuspid vegetations in 3 patients and aortic vegetations in 1 case.

dAdministration of a second antibiotic, with or without a third, together with cloxacillin or vancomycin for >2 days.

eTwo patients received teicoplanin, 1 received imipenem, and 1 received linezolid.

Unless otherwise noted, all values are shown as n (%). Abbreviations: CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; ICD, intracardiac device; IE, infective endocarditis; IQR, interquartile range; NVE, native valve endocarditis; PCM/ICD, pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; PVE, prosthetic valve endocarditis; SD, standard deviation. aOnly 88 patients had available isolates; these 88 patients served as the basis for the rest of the study (see Fig 1). b S. hominis (7), S. capitis (2), S. schleiferi (2). cPCM/ICD wire endocarditis was associated with tricuspid vegetations in 3 patients and aortic vegetations in 1 case. dAdministration of a second antibiotic, with or without a third, together with cloxacillin or vancomycin for >2 days. eTwo patients received teicoplanin, 1 received imipenem, and 1 received linezolid. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of the 88 patients with available isolates are summarized by CoNS species in S1 Table. In-hospital and 1-year mortality rates were similar among groups but were highest among patients infected with S. lugdunensis (55% for both).

CoNS Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns

Ninety-eight isolates were identified in 88 patients: 70 S. epidermidis (71%), 11 S. lugdunensis (11%), 10 S. hominis (10%), and 7 other species (S2 Table). There were 6 and 4 patients with polymicrobial and polyclonal IE, respectively. Susceptibility data are presented in S2 Table. Overall, 44% of the CoNS isolates were methicillin-resistant, including 51% of S. epidermidis. One-third of MRSE also were resistant to gentamicin, rifampin, and ciprofloxacin. All isolates of S. lugdunensis remained methicillin-susceptible. Forty-two isolates had a vancomycin MIC ≥2 μg/mL (35 isolates at 2 μg/mL, 5 isolates at 3 μg/mL, and 2 isolates at 4 μg/mL). By species, 47% of the S. epidermidis isolates and 7% of other species (P<0.001) had vancomycin MICs of 2 μg/mL. The clinical, microbiological and therapeutic characteristics, as well as the outcomes, of the 39 patients with strains with vancomycin MIC ≥2 μg/mL can be seen in S3 Table. Two S. epidermidis isolates (both with vancomycin MICs of 3 μg/mL) demonstrated intermediate resistance to teicoplanin (MIC 16 μg/mL). We did not find any isolates with intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin. Vancomycin MIC did not show a trend towards increase over time for overall CoNS isolates (P = 0.49) nor for S. epidermidis specifically (P = 0.25); this pattern did not change according to methicillin susceptibility. All isolates remained linezolid- and daptomycin-susceptible, but 1 strain each of S. epidermidis and S. capitis had daptomycin MICs of 1.5 μg/mL. Regarding other recommended antibiotics for PVE, we found that 14/31 (45%) of the CoNS isolates in patients with PVE were resistant to gentamicin, rifampin and/or ciprofloxacin.

Impact of Methicillin Susceptibility and Vancomycin MIC on Outcomes

Three of the 88 patients were excluded from the assessment of outcome because they were not treated with either cloxacillin or vancomycin, but instead were treated with teicoplanin (2) and linezolid (1). Cloxacillin was used in 38 (45%) patients (Group 1), and vancomycin was used in 47 (55%). Twelve of these 47 (26%) patients with MS-CoNS were treated with vancomycin because of penicillin allergy (3) or medical decision (9). Of these 12 patients, 2 died (17%). Among patients treated with vancomycin, 27 (32%) had CoNS isolates with vancomycin MICs <2 μg/mL (Group 2) and 20 (24%) had MICs ≥2 μg/mL (Group 3). The main clinical characteristics of the 3 groups are presented in Table 2.
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of 85 patients with CoNS IE according to treatment received (cloxacillin or vancomycin).

Treated with vancomycin
Treated with cloxacillin (N = 38)Vancomycin MIC <2 (N = 27)Vancomycin MIC ≥2 (N = 20) P value
Mean age, y68.5 (55–77)66.0 (59–73.5)60.5 (44.5–72.5)0.182
Male gender28 (74)20 (74)17 (85)0.645
CoNS species0.471
S. epidermidis 22 (58)19 (70)16 (80)
S. lugdunensis 7 (18)4 (15)0
Other6 (16)3 (11)2 (10)
Polymicrobial b 3 (8)1 (4)2 (10)
Predisposing conditions and underlying diseases
Diabetes mellitus3 (8)3 (11)4 (20)0.387
Chronic renal failure2 (5)2 (7)2 (10)0.865
Hemodialysis2 (5)1 (4)00.792
History of cancer4 (11)1 (4)4 (20)0.184
HIV infection01 (4)00.553
Chronic liver disease2 (5)3 (11)5 (25)0.090
Chronic lung disease1 (3)3 (11)00.168
Transplantation01 (4)1 (5)0.500
History of IE1 (3)01 (5)0.713
Presumed mode of acquisition0.080
Nosocomial5 (13)7 (26)6 (30)
Non-nosocomial healthcare associated11 (29)8 (30)10 (50)
Community acquired22 (58)12 (44)4 (20)
Type of endocarditis, n (%)0.109
NV11 (29)10 (37)7 (35)
PV7 (18)8 (30)9 (45)
Pacemaker lead20 (53)9 (33)4 (20)
Valve involvement0.301
Aortic6 (16)9 (33)7 (35)
Mitral8 (21)4 (15)4 (20)
Tricuspid001 (5)
PCM/ICD wire20 (53)94 (20)
Unknown01 (4)1 (5)
Mitral + aortic4 (11)2 (7)2 (10)
Tricuspid + aortic01 (4)0
Tricuspid + aortic + mitral01 (4)1 (5)
Echocardiogra-phic findings
Presence of vegetations28 (74)22 (82)18 (90)0.350
Vegetation size in mm, median (IQR)10 (0–19)10 (1–16)8 (2.5–10)0.881
Perivalvular abscess5 (13)5 (20)5 (26)0.436
Complications
Heart failure9 (24)9 (33)5 (25)0.670
Renal failure11 (29)14 (52)10 (50)0.129
Systemic emboli3 (8)1 (4)4 (20)0.178
Outcomes
Surgery28 (74)16 (59)12 (60)0.394
In-hospital mortality7 (18)12 (44)10 (50)0.021
1-year mortality8 (21)13 (48)13 (65)0.003

Unless otherwise noted, all values are shown as n (%). Abbreviations: CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IE, infective endocarditis; IQR, interquartile range; PCM/ICD, pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; NV, native valve; PV, prosthetic valve.

aThree out of the 88 patients did not receive either cloxacillin or vancomycin and were not included.

b S. hominis (7), S. capitis (2), S. schleiferi (2).

Unless otherwise noted, all values are shown as n (%). Abbreviations: CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IE, infective endocarditis; IQR, interquartile range; PCM/ICD, pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; NV, native valve; PV, prosthetic valve. aThree out of the 88 patients did not receive either cloxacillin or vancomycin and were not included. b S. hominis (7), S. capitis (2), S. schleiferi (2). In-hospital mortality was higher among those patients treated with vancomycin, regardless of vancomycin MIC, than in those treated with cloxacillin (47% vs 18%; P = 0.012). In-hospital mortality was 18%, 44%, and 50% for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.021), and 1-year mortality was 21%, 48%, and 65%, respectively (P = 0.003). Mortality was similar for patients treated with cloxacillin regardless of vancomycin MIC (Fig 2). Conversely, the highest mortality was among vancomycin-treated patients infected with CoNS isolates having vancomycin MICs ≥2 μg/mL (P = 0.007). One-year survival analysis according to the treatment received and vancomycin MIC is presented in Fig 3.
Fig 2

One-year mortality according to antibiotic treatment and vancomycin MIC.

One-year mortality among 85 patients with coagulase-negative staphylococci infective endocarditis, according to antibiotic therapy and vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

Fig 3

One-year survival analysis according to antibiotic therapy and vancomycin MIC.

One-year survival analysis of 85 patients with coagulase-negative staphylococci infective endocarditis according to the treatment received and vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

One-year mortality according to antibiotic treatment and vancomycin MIC.

One-year mortality among 85 patients with coagulase-negative staphylococci infective endocarditis, according to antibiotic therapy and vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

One-year survival analysis according to antibiotic therapy and vancomycin MIC.

One-year survival analysis of 85 patients with coagulase-negative staphylococci infective endocarditis according to the treatment received and vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Table 3 shows the univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors associated with one-year mortality. Using the group of patients with MR-CoNS IE with vancomycin MICs <2 μg/mL treated with vancomycin (Group 2) as the reference, Group 1 (MS-CoNS IE treated with cloxacillin) and Group 3 (MR-CoNS IE with vancomycin MICs ≥2 μg/mL) respectively had independently lower and higher mortality (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02–0.55 and OR 3.7, 95% CI 0.9–15.2, respectively). Other independent variables associated with in-hospital mortality were heart failure and pacemaker lead endocarditis as a protective factor for mortality.
Table 3

Prognostic factors associated with one-year mortality in the 85 patients of CoNS endocarditis treated with either cloxacillin or vancomycin.

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
One-year mortality (N = 34)Survived (N = 51) P valueOR95% CI P value
Mean age (SD), y63.5 (14.3)62.6 (16.1)0.795
Male gender25 (74)40 (78)0.602
Year of diagnosis0.929
199511 (32)16 (31)
200012 (35)20 (39)
200511 (32)15 (29)
CoNS species0.773
S. epidermidis 22 (65)35 (69)
S. lugdunensis 6 (18)5 (10)
Other species a 4 (12)7 (14)
Polymicrobial2 (6)4 (8)
Predisposing conditions and underlying diseases
Diabetes mellitus5 (15)5 (10)0.733
Chronic renal failure4 (12)2 (4)0.212
Hemodialysis1 (3)2 (4)1.000
History of cancer3 (9)6 (12)0.735
HIV infection1 (3)00.400
Chronic liver disease8 (24)3 (6)0.023
Chronic lung disease1 (3)3 (6)0.647
Transplantation01 (2)1.000
History of IE1 (3)1 (2)1.000
Presumed mode of acquisition0.619
Nosocomial8 (24)10 (20)
Non-nosocomial healthcare associated13 (38)16 (31)
Community acquired13 (38)25 (49)
Type of endocarditis
NV19 (56)9 (18)<0.0010.10.02–0.510.006
PV13 (38)11 (22)0.094
Pacemaker lead2 (6)31 (61)<0.001
Valve involvement
Aortic22 (65)12 (24)<0.001
Mitral15 (44)11 (22)0.027
≥2 valves8 (24)3 (6)0.023
Complications
Heart failure18 (53)5 (10)<0.0016.21.5–25.20.011
Renal failure21 (62)14 (28)0.002
Systemic emboli3 (9)5 (10)1.000
Perivalvular abscess10 (29)5 (10)0.020
Surgical treatment16 (47)40 (78)0.003
Treatment groups b 0.003
Cloxacillin8 (24)30 (59)0.120.02–0.550.008
Vancomycin (MIC <2 μg/mL)13 (38)14 (27)1.0
Vancomycin (MIC ≥2 μg/mL)13 (38)7 (14)3.70.9–15.20.069

Unless otherwise noted, all values are shown as n (%). Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IE, infective endocarditis; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; NV, native valve; OR, odds ratio; PV, prosthetic valve; SD, standard deviation.

a S. hominis (7), S. capitis (2), S. schleiferi (2).

bIn the multivariable regression analysis, cloxacillin treatment is the reference category. Vancomycin MIC <2 μg/mL effect on one-year mortality is compared to cloxacillin and Vancomycin MIC ≥2 μg/mL is compared to Vancomycin MIC <2 μg/mL.

Unless otherwise noted, all values are shown as n (%). Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IE, infective endocarditis; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; NV, native valve; OR, odds ratio; PV, prosthetic valve; SD, standard deviation. a S. hominis (7), S. capitis (2), S. schleiferi (2). bIn the multivariable regression analysis, cloxacillin treatment is the reference category. Vancomycin MIC <2 μg/mL effect on one-year mortality is compared to cloxacillin and Vancomycin MIC ≥2 μg/mL is compared to Vancomycin MIC <2 μg/mL.

Discussion

Incidence, Types of IE, and Clinical Characteristics

CoNS are increasingly identified as a cause of NVE [8, 21] and caused 9% of all NVE in our cohort. In one recent multicenter investigation, nearly 8% of all NVE not associated with intravenous drug use (IVDU) were caused by CoNS, predominantly S. epidermidis [8]. A recent multinational prospective cohort study found that 16% of PVE not due to IVDU was attributed to CoNS [6]. S. epidermidis was isolated in 82% of cases, and 67% of these were methicillin-resistant. These results are similar to those seen in our series. In recent data provided by the International Collaboration on Endocarditis (ICE), CoNS was shown to be the second global cause of ICD IE immediately after S. aureus, being more often nosocomially-acquired than S.aureus [18]. Overall, we noted 44% of CoNS isolates were methicillin-resistant, a lower rate than documented in other surveys [19-22], and we did not find an association between methicillin-resistance and healthcare acquisition as did previous studies [8, 21]. Reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (MIC >2 μg/mL) was found in 3% of CoNS isolates in our study, similar to a 2% rate in a recent review of bloodstream infections caused by CoNS [23]. As was the case with other recent summaries of susceptibility data from Spain [20-22], no CoNS isolates were resistant to vancomycin, linezolid, or daptomycin.

Impact of Oxacillin Susceptibility and Vancomycin MIC on Outcome

Vancomycin treatment was associated with higher mortality, especially among patients with IE due to isolates with vancomycin MICs ≥2 μg/mL. A number of studies have found a correlation between vancomycin MIC and poorer outcomes among patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremia [24]. The present study is, to our knowledge, the first to demonstrate the same correlation between poor outcomes and vancomycin MIC in CoNS IE. This finding could have important clinical implications In addition, it suggests an important role for alternative antibacterial agents. In our series, higher vancomycin MICs had no impact on outcomes in patients with MS-CoNS IE receiving cloxacillin. In contrast, a recent study showed that among patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bacteremia treated with flucloxacillin, outcomes were less favourable among those with higher vancomycin MICs [25]. Our group recently found the same association of high vancomycin MIC and left-sidedMSSA IE [26]. Higher vancomycin MICs could be a marker of bad prognosis in S. aureus bacteremia and IE regardless of the administered treatment, with the causative mechanism yet to be identified, but in light of our results, however, we cannot conclude that this hypothetical mechanism is common to all staphylococci.

Impact of Antibiotic Treatment on Outcome

Vancomycin monotherapy is the treatment of choice for MR-CoNS NVE [10,27]. However, we found very high mortality rates in vancomycin-treated patients. A vancomycin trough of 15–20 μg/mL is supposed to achieve the suggested target AUC/MIC ratios of ≥400 for organisms with MICs ≤1 μg/mL [28]. For patients infected with CoNS isolates having MICs ≥2 μg/mL, this ratio was likely not achieved in most cases; this may explain why patients with MR-CoNS IE with vancomycin MIC ≥2 μg/mL had the highest mortality rates. At the time the AHA guidelines were published, higher vancomycin troughs were not yet recommended and so were not targeted in our patients. Nonetheless, Holmes et al [29] did not clearly find better outcomes in patients with S. aureus bacteremia achieving an AUC/MIC ratio >400. Thus, given these recent data and a lack of evidence regarding a correlation between AUC/MIC and CoNS bacteremia/IE outcomes, our results suggest the use of alternative agents to vancomycin. For cases of MR-CoNS PVE, the recommended therapy is vancomycin in combination with rifampin and gentamicin [10,27]. Interestingly, we found that 45% of the CoNS causing PVE were resistant to at least one recommended drug associated to vancomycin (data not shown). Thus, in our setting, it may not be unusual that empirical treatment for CoNS-PVE is inappropriate. Therefore, better antibiotic options are needed for CoNS PVE since deciding the most suitable combination for CoNS PVE may result challenging in light of current evidence. Although clinical data supporting the use of ceftaroline for CoNS IE is lacking, some in vitro studies provide interesting results, showing a good susceptibility profile for ceftaroline against CoNS that includes methicillin-resistant, linezolid-resistant and daptomycin non-susceptible strains [30,31]. Besides, no emergence of ceftaroline-resistant strains has been described to date. Clinical evidence also lacks for telavancin, whose in vitro activity against CoNS is better than vancomycin due to its dual mechanism of action, which confers a rapid bactericidal activity [32, 33]. However, increased MICs for telavancin have been reported in some strains of S. epidermidis with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides [33]. As occurred with the former agent, no clinical experience with tigecycline for the treatment of CoNS IE is yet available and experimental evidence from the IE model has been neither published. Linezolid use is limited in monotherapy due to its bacteriostatic activity. Noteworthy, emergence of resistance to linezolid among CoNS is increasingly reported [34]. Results derived from both in vivo studies and clinical experience with daptomycin are encouraging [35-38]. We have previously shown in animal models that daptomycin was a better therapeutic option than vancomycin [35, 39], particularly for IE caused by MR-CoNS with vancomycin MICs >1 μg/mL. Consequently, we believe that daptomycin should be considered as the preferred alternative for patients with NVE or PVE caused by MR-CoNS.

Study Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, it is a non-randomized, observational study. Second, it was conducted at a single, tertiary referral center for IE, so referral bias limits external validity, as does the loss of some of the isolates of transferred patients. Third, while the total number of IE cases diagnosed in our center is large, the number of documented CoNS cases is relatively small and did not allow us to investigate the impact of vancomycin MIC in subpopulations of interest (eg, at the species level, according to IE type). As stated above, our study lacks pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, especially regarding the assessment of AUC/MIC ratios.

Conclusion

CoNS are well recognized as an important cause of IE, including infections of both native and prosthetic valves, as well as those involving pacemakers. Such infections are often acquired in healthcare settings, and are caused increasingly by pathogens less susceptible to agents like vancomycin that have long been standards of care. While several studies have documented poor outcomes among vancomycin-treated patients with serious S. aureus infections caused by isolates with higher vancomycin MICs, our report is the first to demonstrate a similar pattern among patients with MR-CoNS IE. Alternatives to currently recommended drugs should be considered in future studies. So, additional randomized, controlled studies are warranted.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of 88 patients with IE due to CoNS, according to the CoNS species.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.

Activity of 11 selected antibiotics as determined by Etest for 98 CoNS isolates from 88 patients with IE.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.

Basal characteristics, microbiological features and outcome of the 39 patients with CoNS strains with vancomycin ≥2 μg/mL.

(DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  39 in total

1.  Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.

Authors:  J S Li; D J Sexton; N Mick; R Nettles; V G Fowler; T Ryan; T Bashore; G R Corey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-04-03       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Staphylococcus lugdunensis infective endocarditis: description of 10 cases and analysis of native valve, prosthetic valve, and pacemaker lead endocarditis clinical profiles.

Authors:  I Anguera; A Del Río; J M Miró; X Matínez-Lacasa; F Marco; J R Gumá; G Quaglio; X Claramonte; A Moreno; C A Mestres; E Mauri; M Azqueta; N Benito; C García-de la María; M Almela; M-J Jiménez-Expósito; O Sued; E De Lazzari; J M Gatell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Daptomycin is effective for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant and glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  C García-de-la-Mària; F Marco; Y Armero; D Soy; A Moreno; A del Río; M Almela; C Cervera; S Ninot; C Falces; C A Mestres; J M Gatell; M T Jiménez de Anta; J M Miró
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity of telavancin and comparators against selected groups of Gram-positive cocci.

Authors:  Russell Hope; Aiysha Chaudhry; Rachael Adkin; David M Livermore
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Efficacy of daptomycin versus vancomycin in an experimental model of foreign-body and systemic infection caused by biofilm producers and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  J Domínguez-Herrera; F Docobo-Pérez; R López-Rojas; C Pichardo; R Ruiz-Valderas; J A Lepe; J Pachón
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Daptomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis native-valve endocarditis: a case report.

Authors:  Marylene Duah
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.944

7.  Characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from blood with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Silvia Natoli; Carla Fontana; Marco Favaro; Alberto Bergamini; Gian Piero Testore; Silvia Minelli; Maria Cristina Bossa; Mauro Casapulla; Giorgia Broglio; Angela Beltrame; Laura Cudillo; Raffaella Cerretti; Francesca Leonardis
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  David R Murdoch; G Ralph Corey; Bruno Hoen; José M Miró; Vance G Fowler; Arnold S Bayer; Adolf W Karchmer; Lars Olaison; Paul A Pappas; Philippe Moreillon; Stephen T Chambers; Vivian H Chu; Vicenç Falcó; David J Holland; Philip Jones; John L Klein; Nigel J Raymond; Kerry M Read; Marie Francoise Tripodi; Riccardo Utili; Andrew Wang; Christopher W Woods; Christopher H Cabell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-03-09

9.  Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  George Sakoulas; Pamela A Moise-Broder; Jerome Schentag; Alan Forrest; Robert C Moellering; George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  The emerging problem of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus.

Authors:  Bing Gu; Theodoros Kelesidis; Sotirios Tsiodras; Janet Hindler; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 5.758

View more
  5 in total

1.  Association between daptomycin susceptibility and teicoplanin resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Shinichi Watanabe; Yukinobu Kawakami; Hiroshi Kimura; Shinobu Murakami; Hitoshi Miyamoto; Shingo Takatori; Koichiro Suemori; Mamoru Tanaka; Akihiro Tanaka; Keiko Tanaka; Hisamichi Tauchi; Jun Maki; Hiroaki Araki; Takumi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Prevalence and phylogenetic relationship among methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococci isolated from hospital's dairy food, food handlers, and patients.

Authors:  Mona Ahmed El-Zamkan; Asmaa Gaber Mubarak; Alsagher Omran Ali
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2019-10-13

Review 3.  Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) as a significant etiological factor of laryngological infections: a review.

Authors:  Michał Michalik; Alfred Samet; Adrianna Podbielska-Kubera; Vincenzo Savini; Jacek Międzobrodzki; Maja Kosecka-Strojek
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  Clinical Features and Outcome of Infective Endocarditis in a University Hospital in Romania.

Authors:  Emilia Elena Babeș; Diana Anca Lucuța; Codruța Diana Petcheși; Andreea Atena Zaha; Cristian Ilyes; Alexandru Daniel Jurca; Cosmin Mihai Vesa; Dana Carmen Zaha; Vlad Victor Babeș
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Clinical and prognostic differences between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis.

Authors:  Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio; Juan Gálvez; Francisco Javier Martínez-Marcos; Antonio Plata-Ciezar; Javier De La Torre-Lima; Luis Eduardo López-Cortés; Mariam Noureddine; José M Reguera; David Vinuesa; Maria Victoria García; Guillermo Ojeda; Rafael Luque; José Manuel Lomas; Jose Antonio Lepe; Arístides de Alarcón
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.090

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.