Literature DB >> 18171250

Influence of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Alex Soriano1, Francesc Marco, José A Martínez, Elena Pisos, Manel Almela, Veselka P Dimova, Dolores Alamo, Mar Ortega, Josefina Lopez, Josep Mensa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin treatment failure in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is not uncommon, even when MRSA is susceptible to vancomycin. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration has any influence on the mortality associated with MRSA bacteremia.
METHODS: A total of 414 episodes of MRSA bacteremia were prospectively followed-up from 1991 through 2005. MIC of vancomycin for the first isolate was determined by E-test. Clinical variables recorded were age, comorbidity, prior administration of vancomycin, use of corticosteroids, prognosis of underlying disease, source of bacteremia, the need for mechanical ventilation, shock, and mortality. A "treatment group" variable was created and defined as follows: (1) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 1 microg/mL (38 episodes), (2) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 1.5 microg/mL (90 episodes), (3) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL (40 episodes), and (4) receipt of inappropriate empirical therapy (246 episodes). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Episodes caused by strains with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL were independently associated with a lower risk of shock (odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.75). Multivariate analysis selected receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL (OR, 6.39; 95% CI, 1.68-24.3), receipt of inappropriate empirical therapy (OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.20-10.9), increasing age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04), use of corticosteroids (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.04-3.29), an ultimately (OR, 10.2; 95% CI, 2.85-36.8) or rapidly (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.06-3.10) fatal underlying disease, high-risk (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.89-6.88) and intermediate-risk (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.17-4.04) sources of bacteremia, and shock (OR, 7.38; 95% CI, 4.11-13.3) as the best predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Mortality associated with MRSA bacteremia was significantly higher when the empirical antibiotic was inappropriate and when vancomycin was empirically used for treatment of infection with strains with a high vancomycin MIC (>1 microg/mL).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18171250     DOI: 10.1086/524667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  224 in total

1.  Efficacy of usual and high doses of daptomycin in combination with rifampin versus alternative therapies in experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Garrigós; O Murillo; G Euba; R Verdaguer; F Tubau; C Cabellos; J Cabo; J Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  An association between bacterial genotype combined with a high-vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and risk of endocarditis in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Clare E Miller; Rahul Batra; Ben S Cooper; Amita K Patel; John Klein; Jonathan A Otter; Theodore Kypraios; Gary L French; Olga Tosas; Jonathan D Edgeworth
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Is vancomycin MIC "creep" method dependent? Analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility trends in blood isolates from North East Scotland from 2006 to 2010.

Authors:  B Edwards; K Milne; T Lawes; I Cook; A Robb; I M Gould
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of daptomycin, tigecycline, and linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA infections in four western European countries.

Authors:  A Canut; A Isla; C Betriu; A R Gascón
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Current trends in the management of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections.

Authors:  Emanuele Durante-Mangoni; Irene Mattucci; Federica Agrusta; Marie-Françoise Tripodi; Riccardo Utili
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for sepsis.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Vered Shani; Eli Muchtar; Galia Kariv; Eyal Robenshtok; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  USA600 (ST45) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections in urban Detroit.

Authors:  Carol L Moore; Paola Osaki-Kiyan; Marybeth Perri; Susan Donabedian; Nadia Z Haque; Anne Chen; Marcus J Zervos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the significance of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  Sebastiaan J van Hal; David L Paterson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Advances in the management of sepsis and the understanding of key immunologic defects.

Authors:  Lee P Skrupky; Paul W Kerby; Richard S Hotchkiss
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  Management of antimicrobial use in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Francisco Álvarez-Lerma; Santiago Grau
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.