Literature DB >> 19873687

Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adults summary of consensus recommendations from the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.

Michael J Rybak1, Ben M Lomaestro, John C Rotschafer, Robert C Moellering, William A Craig, Marianne Billeter, Joseph R Dalovisio, Donald P Levine.   

Abstract

Vancomycin is a commonly used antibiotic due to its effectiveness in treating serious gram-positive infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. As commercial drug assays and a multitude of pharmacokinetic data from a variety of patient populations are widely available, therapeutic monitoring of serum vancomycin concentrations is frequently performed by clinicians, with the expectation that targeting the concentrations within a relatively narrow range can minimize toxicity yet still achieve therapeutic success. Much debate exists, however, over the value of routine therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin levels because of conflicting evidence regarding the ability of serum concentrations to predict effectiveness or prevent toxicity. In addition, studies have suggested that the potential for nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity with vancomycin monotherapy is minimal at conventional dosages of 1 g (15 mg/kg) every 12 hours. However, increased rates of nephrotoxicity have recently been reported with doses of 4 g/day or higher. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists published a consensus statement on therapeutic monitoring of serum vancomycin levels in adults. These organizations established an expert panel to review the scientific data and controversies associated with vancomycin monitoring and to make recommendations based on the available evidence. As the members of this panel, we summarize the conclusions and highlight the recommendations from the consensus statement. We determined that the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC): minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio is the most useful pharmacodynamic parameter to predict vancomycin effectiveness and suggested a target ratio of 400 or greater to eradicate S. aureus. In addition, trough serum concentration monitoring is the most accurate and practical method to monitor vancomycin serum levels. Increasing trough concentrations to 15-20 mg/L to attain the target AUC:MIC ratio may be desirable but is currently not supported by clinical trials. Alternative therapies should be considered in patients with S. aureus infections that demonstrate a vancomycin MIC of 2 mg/L or greater because the target AUC:MIC ratio ( 400) is unlikely to be achieved in this setting. Increasing the dosage to result in higher trough concentrations may increase the potential for toxicity; however additional clinical experience is required to determine the extent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19873687     DOI: 10.1592/phco.29.11.1275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  81 in total

1.  Antimicrobial stewardship.

Authors:  Shira Doron; Lisa E Davidson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Management of antimicrobial use in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Francisco Álvarez-Lerma; Santiago Grau
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Ross Norris; David L Paterson; Jennifer H Martin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Clinical efficacy and safety of arbekacin for high-risk infections in patients with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Miura; Masaru Nakagawa; Hiromichi Takahashi; Yoshihito Uchino; Hitomi Kodaira; Noriyoshi Iriyama; Masashi Sakagami; Shimon Ohtake; Sumiko Kobayashi; Atsuko Hojo; Daisuke Kurita; Yujin Kobayashi; Machiko Kusuda; Yukio Hirabayashi; Yoshihiro Hatta; Masami Takei
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  Generic vancomycin enriches resistant subpopulations of Staphylococcus aureus after exposure in a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model.

Authors:  Carlos A Rodriguez; Maria Agudelo; Andres F Zuluaga; Omar Vesga
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  A Guide to Understanding Antimicrobial Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Valentina Pistolesi; Santo Morabito; Francesca Di Mario; Giuseppe Regolisti; Chiara Cantarelli; Enrico Fiaccadori
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Vancomycin monitoring in children using bayesian estimation.

Authors:  Jennifer Le; Becky Ngu; John S Bradley; William Murray; Austin Nguyen; Lyn Nguyen; Gale L Romanowski; Tiana Vo; Edmund V Capparelli
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  Alternative calibration strategies for the clinical laboratory: application to nortriptyline therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Matthew T Olson; Autumn Breaud; Robert Harlan; Nkechinyere Emezienna; Sabitha Schools; Alfred L Yergey; William Clarke
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Vancomycin 24-Hour Area under the Curve/Minimum Bactericidal Concentration Ratio as a Novel Predictor of Mortality in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Nicholas S Britt; Nimish Patel; Rebecca T Horvat; Molly E Steed
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Adverse drug events during AKI and its recovery.

Authors:  Zachary L Cox; Allison B McCoy; Michael E Matheny; Gautam Bhave; Neeraja B Peterson; Edward D Siew; Julia Lewis; Ioana Danciu; Aihua Bian; Ayumi Shintani; T Alp Ikizler; Erin B Neal; Josh F Peterson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.