BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis has a high mortality rate. Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has been shown to affect the outcome of methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremia, and recent data point to a similar effect on methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia. We aimed to evaluate the effect of vancomycin MIC on left-sided S. aureus infective endocarditis (IE) treated with cloxacillin. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively collected cohort of patients with IE in a single tertiary-care hospital. Vancomycin, daptomycin, and cloxacillin MIC was determined by E-test. S. aureus strains were categorized as low vancomycin MIC (<1.5 µg/mL) and high vancomycin MIC (≥1.5 µg/mL). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed 93 patients with left-sided IE treated with cloxacillin, of whom 53 (57%) had a vancomycin MIC < 1.5 µg/mL and 40 (43%) a vancomycin MIC ≥ 1.5 µg/mL. In-hospital mortality was 30% (n = 16/53) in patients with a low vancomycin MIC and 53% (n = 21/40) in those with a high vancomycin MIC (P = .03). No correlation was found between oxacillin MIC and vancomycin or daptomycin MIC. Logistic regression analysis showed that higher vancomycin MIC increased in-hospital mortality 3-fold (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-8.2) after adjustment for age, year of diagnosis, septic complications, and nonseptic complicated endocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that vancomycin MIC could be used to identify a subgroup of patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus IE at risk of higher mortality. The worse outcome of staphylococcal infections with a higher vancomycin MIC cannot be explained solely by suboptimal pharmacokinetics of antibiotics.
BACKGROUND:Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis has a high mortality rate. Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has been shown to affect the outcome of methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremia, and recent data point to a similar effect on methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia. We aimed to evaluate the effect of vancomycin MIC on left-sided S. aureus infective endocarditis (IE) treated with cloxacillin. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively collected cohort of patients with IE in a single tertiary-care hospital. Vancomycin, daptomycin, and cloxacillin MIC was determined by E-test. S. aureus strains were categorized as low vancomycin MIC (<1.5 µg/mL) and high vancomycin MIC (≥1.5 µg/mL). The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed 93 patients with left-sided IE treated with cloxacillin, of whom 53 (57%) had a vancomycin MIC < 1.5 µg/mL and 40 (43%) a vancomycin MIC ≥ 1.5 µg/mL. In-hospital mortality was 30% (n = 16/53) in patients with a low vancomycin MIC and 53% (n = 21/40) in those with a high vancomycin MIC (P = .03). No correlation was found between oxacillin MIC and vancomycin or daptomycin MIC. Logistic regression analysis showed that higher vancomycin MIC increased in-hospital mortality 3-fold (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-8.2) after adjustment for age, year of diagnosis, septic complications, and nonseptic complicated endocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that vancomycin MIC could be used to identify a subgroup of patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus IE at risk of higher mortality. The worse outcome of staphylococcal infections with a higher vancomycin MIC cannot be explained solely by suboptimal pharmacokinetics of antibiotics.
Authors: J M Pericàs; J A Messina; C Garcia-de-la-Mària; L Park; B K Sharma-Kuinkel; F Marco; D Wray; Z A Kanafani; M Carugati; E Durante-Mangoni; P Tattevin; V H Chu; A Moreno; V G Fowler; J M Miró Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: D M Martirosov; M R Bidell; M P Pai; M H Scheetz; S L Rosenkranz; T P Lodise Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2017-04-02 Impact factor: 2.803
Authors: Thomas L Holland; Larry M Baddour; Arnold S Bayer; Bruno Hoen; Jose M Miro; Vance G Fowler Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: J Ruiz-Ramos; P Vidal-Cortés; A Díaz-Lamas; R Reig-Valero; F Roche-Campo; M Del Valle-Ortiz; X Nuvials-Casals; M Ortiz-Piquer; D Andaluz-Ojeda; L Tamayo-Lomas; M A Blasco-Navalpotro; M Rodriguez-Aguirregabiria; J Aguado; P Ramirez Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Ruchi Bhandari; Shabnam Tiwari; Talia Alexander; Frank H Annie; Umar Kaleem; Affan Irfan; Sudarshan Balla; R Constance Wiener; Chris Cook; Aravinda Nanjundappa; Mark Bates; Ellen Thompson; Gordon S Smith; Judith Feinberg; Melanie A Fisher Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-18 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: M M Gallardo-García; G Sánchez-Espín; R Ivanova-Georgieva; J Ruíz-Morales; I Rodríguez-Bailón; V Viñuela González; M V García-López Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Juan M Pericàs; Carlos Cervera; Cristina Garcia-de-la-Mària; Batu K Sharma-Kuinkel; Rachelle Gonzales; Asunción Moreno; Manel Almela; Carlos Falces; Eduard Quintana; David Fuster; Francesc Marco; Arnold S Bayer; Vance G Fowler; José M Miró Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: F Scasso; G Ferrari; G C DE Vincentiis; A Arosio; S Bottero; M Carretti; A Ciardo; S Cocuzza; A Colombo; B Conti; A Cordone; M DE Ciccio; E Delehaye; L Della Vecchia; I DE Macina; C Dentone; P DI Mauro; R Dorati; R Fazio; A Ferrari; G Ferrea; S Giannantonio; I Genta; M Giuliani; D Lucidi; L Maiolino; G Marini; P Marsella; D Meucci; T Modena; B Montemurri; A Odone; S Palma; M L Panatta; M Piemonte; P Pisani; S Pisani; L Prioglio; A Scorpecci; L Scotto DI Santillo; A Serra; C Signorelli; E Sitzia; M L Tropiano; M Trozzi; F M Tucci; L Vezzosi; B Viaggi Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.124