Literature DB >> 23629712

Antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline tested against staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to linezolid, daptomycin, or vancomycin from U.S. hospitals, 2008 to 2011.

Helio S Sader1, Robert K Flamm, Ronald N Jones.   

Abstract

Vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin are very active against staphylococci, but isolates with decreased susceptibility to these antimicrobial agents are isolated sporadically. A total of 19,350 Staphylococcus aureus isolates (51% methicillin resistant [MRSA]) and 3,270 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were collected consecutively from 82 U.S. medical centers from January 2008 to December 2011 and tested for susceptibility against ceftaroline and comparator agents by the reference broth microdilution method. Among S. aureus strains, 14 isolates (0.07%) exhibited decreased susceptibility to linezolid (MIC, ≥ 8 μg/ml), 18 (0.09%) to daptomycin (MIC, ≥ 2 μg/ml), and 369 (1.9%) to vancomycin (MIC, ≥ 2 μg/ml; 368 isolates at 2 μg/ml and 1 at 4 μg/ml). Fifty-one (1.6%) CoNS were linezolid resistant (MIC, ≥ 8 μg/ml), and four (0.12%) were daptomycin nonsusceptible (MIC, ≥ 2 μg/ml). Ceftaroline was very active against S. aureus overall (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 98.5% susceptible), including MRSA (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 97.2% susceptible). All daptomycin-nonsusceptible and 85.7% of linezolid-resistant S. aureus isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. Against S. aureus isolates with a vancomycin MIC of ≥ 2 μg/ml, 91.9, 96.2, and 98.9% were susceptible to ceftaroline, daptomycin, and linezolid, respectively. CoNS strains were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml; 99.1% inhibited at ≤ 1 μg/ml), including methicillin-resistant (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml), linezolid-resistant (MIC50/90, 0.5/0.5 μg/ml), and daptomycin-nonsusceptible (4 isolates; MIC range, 0.03 to 0.12 μg/ml) strains. In conclusion, ceftaroline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to linezolid, daptomycin, or vancomycin, and it may represent a valuable treatment option for infections caused by these multidrug-resistant staphylococci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23629712      PMCID: PMC3697312          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00484-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  17 in total

Review 1.  Serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Helen Boucher; Loren G Miller; Raymund R Razonable
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Antimicrobial resistance: Not community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA)! A clinician's guide to community MRSA - its evolving antimicrobial resistance and implications for therapy.

Authors:  Kyra Chua; Frederic Laurent; Geoffrey Coombs; M Lindsay Grayson; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Comparative activity of linezolid against respiratory tract infection isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: an 11-year report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones; David J Farrell; Helio S Sader
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 4.  Revisiting "older" antimicrobials in the era of multidrug resistance.

Authors:  Jason M Pogue; Dror Marchaim; Donald Kaye; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  Clinical impact of antimicrobial resistance in European hospitals: excess mortality and length of hospital stay related to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Marlieke E A de Kraker; Martin Wolkewitz; Peter G Davey; Walter Koller; Jutta Berger; Jan Nagler; Claudine Icket; Smilja Kalenic; Jasminka Horvatic; Harald Seifert; Achim J Kaasch; Olga Paniara; Athina Argyropoulou; Maria Bompola; Edmond Smyth; Mairead Skally; Annibale Raglio; Uga Dumpis; Agita Melbarde Kelmere; Michael Borg; Deborah Xuereb; Mihaela C Ghita; Michelle Noble; Jana Kolman; Stanko Grabljevec; David Turner; Louise Lansbury; Hajo Grundmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Susceptibility patterns of coagulase-negative staphylococci to several newer antimicrobial agents in comparison with vancomycin and oxacillin.

Authors:  J Ian Stuart; Michael A John; Sue Milburn; Deb Diagre; Beverly Wilson; Zafar Hussain
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 5.283

7.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of daptomycin and comparator agents tested against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: trend analysis of a 6-year period in US medical centers (2005-2010).

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Gary J Moet; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Emergence of multidrug-resistant, community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone USA300 in men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Binh An Diep; Henry F Chambers; Christopher J Graber; John D Szumowski; Loren G Miller; Linda L Han; Jason H Chen; Felice Lin; Jessica Lin; Tiffany HaiVan Phan; Heather A Carleton; Linda K McDougal; Fred C Tenover; Daniel E Cohen; Kenneth H Mayer; George F Sensabaugh; Françoise Perdreau-Remington
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  β-Lactams increase the antibacterial activity of daptomycin against clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains and prevent selection of daptomycin-resistant derivatives.

Authors:  Shrenik Mehta; Christopher Singh; Konrad B Plata; Palas K Chanda; Arundhati Paul; Sarah Riosa; Roberto R Rosato; Adriana E Rosato
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Trends in US hospital admissions for skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  John Edelsberg; Charu Taneja; Marcus Zervos; Nadia Haque; Carol Moore; Katherine Reyes; James Spalding; Jenny Jiang; Gerry Oster
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  17 in total

1.  Antimicrobial Susceptibility Trends among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from U.S. Hospitals: Results from 7 Years of the Ceftaroline (AWARE) Surveillance Program, 2010 to 2016.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Rodrigo E Mendes; Jennifer M Streit; Robert K Flamm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Ceftaroline activity against bacterial pathogens frequently isolated in U.S. medical centers: results from five years of the AWARE surveillance program.

Authors:  Helio S Sader; Robert K Flamm; Jennifer M Streit; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Mouse models for infectious diseases caused by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Hwan Keun Kim; Dominique Missiakas; Olaf Schneewind
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Ceftaroline is active against heteroresistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains despite associated mutational mechanisms and intermediate levels of resistance.

Authors:  Regina Fernandez; Liliana I Paz; Roberto R Rosato; Adriana E Rosato
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Missense mutations in PBP2A Affecting ceftaroline susceptibility detected in epidemic hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clonotypes ST228 and ST247 in Western Switzerland archived since 1998.

Authors:  William L Kelley; Ambre Jousselin; Christine Barras; Emmanuelle Lelong; Adriana Renzoni
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Isolates of Human and Animal Origin.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Max T Wu; Lars F Westblade; Amy E Robertson; Carey-Ann D Burnham; Meghan A Wallace; Eileen M Burd; Sara Lawhon; Janet A Hindler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Multicenter Observational Study of Ceftaroline Fosamil for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Evan J Zasowski; Trang D Trinh; Kimberly C Claeys; Anthony M Casapao; Noor Sabagha; Abdalhamid M Lagnf; Kenneth P Klinker; Susan L Davis; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Reduced In Vitro Activity of Ceftaroline by Etest among Clonal Complex 239 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Strains from Australia.

Authors:  I J Abbott; A W J Jenney; C J Jeremiah; M Mirčeta; J P Kandiah; D C Holt; S Y C Tong; D W Spelman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  Karsten Becker; Christine Heilmann; Georg Peters
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 10.  Antimicrobial resistance in nephrology.

Authors:  Tina Z Wang; Rosy Priya L Kodiyanplakkal; David P Calfee
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 28.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.