BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The pituitary gland is located outside of the blood-brain barrier. Dynamic T1 weighted contrast enhanced sequence is considered to be the gold standard to evaluate this region. However, it does not allow assessment of intrinsic permeability properties of the gland. Our aim was to demonstrate the utility of radial volumetric interpolated brain examination with the golden-angle radial sparse parallel technique to evaluate permeability characteristics of the individual components (anterior and posterior gland and the median eminence) of the pituitary gland and areas of differential enhancement and to optimize the study acquisition time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 52 patients (group 1, 25 patients with normal pituitary glands; and group 2, 27 patients with a known diagnosis of microadenoma). Radial volumetric interpolated brain examination sequences with golden-angle radial sparse parallel technique were evaluated with an ROI-based method to obtain signal-time curves and permeability measures of individual normal structures within the pituitary gland and areas of differential enhancement. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences in the permeability parameters of these individual regions and optimize the study acquisition time. RESULTS: Signal-time curves from the posterior pituitary gland and median eminence demonstrated a faster wash-in and time of maximum enhancement with a lower peak of enhancement compared with the anterior pituitary gland (P < .005). Time-optimization analysis demonstrated that 120 seconds is ideal for dynamic pituitary gland evaluation. In the absence of a clinical history, differences in the signal-time curves allow easy distinction between a simple cyst and a microadenoma. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study confirms the ability of the golden-angle radial sparse parallel technique to evaluate the permeability characteristics of the pituitary gland and establishes 120 seconds as the ideal acquisition time for dynamic pituitary gland imaging.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The pituitary gland is located outside of the blood-brain barrier. Dynamic T1 weighted contrast enhanced sequence is considered to be the gold standard to evaluate this region. However, it does not allow assessment of intrinsic permeability properties of the gland. Our aim was to demonstrate the utility of radial volumetric interpolated brain examination with the golden-angle radial sparse parallel technique to evaluate permeability characteristics of the individual components (anterior and posterior gland and the median eminence) of the pituitary gland and areas of differential enhancement and to optimize the study acquisition time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 52 patients (group 1, 25 patients with normal pituitary glands; and group 2, 27 patients with a known diagnosis of microadenoma). Radial volumetric interpolated brain examination sequences with golden-angle radial sparse parallel technique were evaluated with an ROI-based method to obtain signal-time curves and permeability measures of individual normal structures within the pituitary gland and areas of differential enhancement. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences in the permeability parameters of these individual regions and optimize the study acquisition time. RESULTS: Signal-time curves from the posterior pituitary gland and median eminence demonstrated a faster wash-in and time of maximum enhancement with a lower peak of enhancement compared with the anterior pituitary gland (P < .005). Time-optimization analysis demonstrated that 120 seconds is ideal for dynamic pituitary gland evaluation. In the absence of a clinical history, differences in the signal-time curves allow easy distinction between a simple cyst and a microadenoma. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study confirms the ability of the golden-angle radial sparse parallel technique to evaluate the permeability characteristics of the pituitary gland and establishes 120 seconds as the ideal acquisition time for dynamic pituitary gland imaging.
Authors: Hersh Chandarana; Tobias K Block; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ruth P Lim; Danny Kim; David J Mossa; James S Babb; Berthold Kiefer; Vivian S Lee Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Shereen Ezzat; Sylvia L Asa; William T Couldwell; Charles E Barr; William E Dodge; Mary Lee Vance; Ian E McCutcheon Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Hersh Chandarana; Li Feng; Tobias K Block; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ruth P Lim; James S Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Laura Heacock; Yiming Gao; Samantha L Heller; Amy N Melsaether; James S Babb; Tobias K Block; Ricardo Otazo; Sungheon G Kim; Linda Moy Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: R Sen; C Sen; J Pack; K T Block; J G Golfinos; V Prabhu; F Boada; O Gonen; D Kondziolka; G Fatterpekar Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Thomas Benkert; Ye Tian; Chenchan Huang; Edward V R DiBella; Hersh Chandarana; Li Feng Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: T Demerath; K Blackham; C Anastasopoulos; K T Block; B Stieltjes; T Schubert Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 2.546