T Demerath1, K Blackham2, C Anastasopoulos2, K T Block3, B Stieltjes2, T Schubert4. 1. Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Breisacherstrasse 64, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address: Theo.demerath@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. 3. Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. 4. Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the value of DCE MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution (GRASP) for differentiating paragangliomas and schwannomas in the head and neck. METHODS: In a retrospective PACS search of in total 410 patients who had undergone head & neck GRASP-MRI, we identified 6 patients with biopsy proven cervical paragangliomas (n = 3) and schwannomas (n = 3). Conventional MRI features were evaluated, lesion size was determined. Postprocessing in 4D-GRASP datasets was performed (1) based on reconstructions with a temporal resolution (Tres) of 4.1 s, qualitative time-intensity curve classification and semiquantitative parameter (Tpeak, PH, ERmax and Slopemax) analysis, and (2) voxel-based mapping and qualitative and semiquantitative perfusion modeling based on reconstructions with a Tres of 1.6 s. Additionally, GRASP perfusion analysis was performed in another set of 5 patients with presumed cervical paragangliomas (n = 3) and schwannomas (n = 2) based on conventional imaging criteria and was correlated with conventional imaging findings. Due to the small sample size, both groups were compared qualitatively. RESULTS: In the time intensity curve classification of 4D GRASP reconstructions (Tres 4.1 s), biopsy proven paragangliomas were consistently characterized by a type-III rapid inflow wash-out pattern, compared to a type-I inflow pattern in the schwannoma group. In both temporal resolutions, semiquantitative analysis of time intensity curves demonstrated rapid wash-in, wash-out, and higher peak signal intensities in paragangliomas compared to schwannomas. In 5 presumed (non-biopsy-proven) paragangliomas and schwannomas, time intensity curves improved diagnostic certainty. CONCLUSIONS: Visual time intensity curve classification and semi-quantitative analysis of GRASP-MRI were, in this small retrospective series, sufficient to differentiate cervical paragangliomas from schwannomas. Utilization of this technique may further improve diagnostic confidence in lesions lacking conventional imaging features.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the value of DCE MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution (GRASP) for differentiating paragangliomas and schwannomas in the head and neck. METHODS: In a retrospective PACS search of in total 410 patients who had undergone head & neck GRASP-MRI, we identified 6 patients with biopsy proven cervical paragangliomas (n = 3) and schwannomas (n = 3). Conventional MRI features were evaluated, lesion size was determined. Postprocessing in 4D-GRASP datasets was performed (1) based on reconstructions with a temporal resolution (Tres) of 4.1 s, qualitative time-intensity curve classification and semiquantitative parameter (Tpeak, PH, ERmax and Slopemax) analysis, and (2) voxel-based mapping and qualitative and semiquantitative perfusion modeling based on reconstructions with a Tres of 1.6 s. Additionally, GRASP perfusion analysis was performed in another set of 5 patients with presumed cervical paragangliomas (n = 3) and schwannomas (n = 2) based on conventional imaging criteria and was correlated with conventional imaging findings. Due to the small sample size, both groups were compared qualitatively. RESULTS: In the time intensity curve classification of 4D GRASP reconstructions (Tres 4.1 s), biopsy proven paragangliomas were consistently characterized by a type-III rapid inflow wash-out pattern, compared to a type-I inflow pattern in the schwannoma group. In both temporal resolutions, semiquantitative analysis of time intensity curves demonstrated rapid wash-in, wash-out, and higher peak signal intensities in paragangliomas compared to schwannomas. In 5 presumed (non-biopsy-proven) paragangliomas and schwannomas, time intensity curves improved diagnostic certainty. CONCLUSIONS: Visual time intensity curve classification and semi-quantitative analysis of GRASP-MRI were, in this small retrospective series, sufficient to differentiate cervical paragangliomas from schwannomas. Utilization of this technique may further improve diagnostic confidence in lesions lacking conventional imaging features.
Authors: Frédéric Castinetti; Alexander Kroiss; Rakesh Kumar; Karel Pacak; David Taieb Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Nicolin Hainc; Christoph Stippich; Julia Reinhardt; Bram Stieltjes; Maria Blatow; Luigi Mariani; Andrea Bink Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Laura Heacock; Yiming Gao; Samantha L Heller; Amy N Melsaether; James S Babb; Tobias K Block; Ricardo Otazo; Sungheon G Kim; Linda Moy Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Gloria Y Kim; Peter F Lawrence; Rameen S Moridzadeh; Kate Zimmerman; Alberto Munoz; Kuauhyama Luna-Ortiz; Gustavo S Oderich; Juan de Francisco; Jorge Ospina; Santiago Huertas; Leonardo R de Souza; Thomas C Bower; Steven Farley; Hugh A Gelabert; Marcus R Kret; E John Harris; Giovanni De Caridi; Francesco Spinelli; Matthew R Smeds; Christos D Liapis; John Kakisis; Anastasios P Papapetrou; Eike S Debus; Christian-A Behrendt; Edgar Kleinspehn; Joshua D Horton; Firas F Mussa; Stephen W K Cheng; Mark D Morasch; Khurram Rasheed; Matthew E Bennett; Jean Bismuth; Alan B Lumsden; Christopher J Abularrage; Alik Farber Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Sebastian M Arnold; Ralph Strecker; Klaus Scheffler; Joachim Spreer; Jörg Schipper; Hartmut P H Neumann; Joachim Klisch Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A P van Gils; R van den Berg; T H Falke; J L Bloem; H J Prins; E H Dillon; A G van der Mey; E K Pauwels Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 3.959